Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1880/49667
Title: Whatever Happened to ... R. v. Sault Ste. Marie: the Due Diligence Defence
Authors: Bowal, Peter
Iss, Lindsey
Keywords: actions & defenses - law;strict liability - Canada
Issue Date: Jan-2013
Publisher: Legal Resource Centre of Alberta Ltd. (LRC)
Citation: Bowal, P. & Iss, L. (2013). Whatever Happened to . . . R. v. Sault Ste. Marie: the Due Diligence Defence. Lawnow, 37(3), 63-67.
Abstract: The article discusses the decision in the case of R. v. Sault Ste. Marie and its impact on Canadian law. The authors state that Brian Dickinson, Chief Justice of Canada, defined and inserted the category of strict liability offence which gives rise to the due diligence defence. They note that water pollution concerns in Sault Saint Marie, Michigan and Ontario has now been identified. They mention that the city has committed to keep its water through continuous surveillance and maintenance.
Description: Article deposited after permission was granted by LRC, June 11, 2013.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1880/49667
ISSN: 0841-2626
Appears in Collections:Bowal, Peter

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bowal_Whatever_SaultSteMarie2013_LawNow.pdf119.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.