Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50401
Title: Constitutional Rights to Supervised Drug Injection Facilities in Canada
Authors: Bowal, Peter
Horvat, Kelsey
Keywords: Injection facility;Insite;government health and criminal policy
Issue Date: Feb-2013
Publisher: International Review of Law
Citation: Peter Bowal and Kelsey Horvat, “Constitutional Rights to Supervised Drug Injection Facilities in Canada,” 2013:3 International Review of Law http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/irl.2013.3
Abstract: On September 30, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada ordered the government of Canada to continue to exempt Vancouver's supervised narcotic injection facility from Canada's criminal drug laws. The controversial clinic, known as Insite, had operated for eight years in one of the country's most socially troubled and economically challenged neighbourhoods struggling with addictions to illegal drugs. Insite was the first of its kind in North America, although supervised drug injection facilities continue in Europe and Australia. In this article we describe what the court accepted as the factual outcomes of this clinic and the constitutional basis for this judicial rejection of government health and criminal policy. We also consider the implications of this decision for similar facilities across Canada. Read More: http://www.qscience.com/doi/abs/10.5339/irl.2013.3
Description: Article deposited with permission by CPLEA 03/31/2015
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50401
Appears in Collections:Bowal, Peter

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bowal_Constitutional rights to be supervised drug unjection facilities in Canada_2013.pdfMain Article155.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.