Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing: Regulatory Recourse for Subsurface Communication
Date
2015-09
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Canadian Institute of Resources Law
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the legal framework for the regulation of hydraulic fracturing in Alberta and examines the potential regulatory options and liability for subsurface communication caused by hydraulic fracturing activities. Specifically, this paper examines the jurisdiction of the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to: (i) order that operations be shut-in or suspended due to communication, (ii) impose obligations on industry to provide notification of hydraulic fracturing activities, including subsurface communication, (iii) order mandatory commingling orders, (iv) encourage production sharing agreements, and (v) impose testing, monitoring, production controls and reporting obligations.
With the widespread use of multistage horizontal hydraulic fracturing, disputes related to subsurface communication will continue to be raised with the AER and in the courts. Thus far the AER has taken a risk management approach through monitoring and testing requirements. Generally, the AER has permitted development to occur by endorsing an approach which relies on the known and inevitable consequences of mining and recovering the minerals. This approach has been justified by the AER on the basis that any production of another’s minerals does not result in irreparable harm. The harm or damaged caused can be identified, quantified and compensation paid.
Description
Keywords
regulation of hydraulic fracturing in Alberta
Citation
Kimberly Howard, "Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing: Regulatory Recourse for Subsurface Communication", Occasional Paper #51 (Calgary: Canadian Institute of Resources Law, 2015)