Browsing by Author "Chirica, Mircea"

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A pandemic recap: lessons we have learned
    (2021-09-10) Coccolini, Federico; Cicuttin, Enrico; Cremonini, Camilla; Tartaglia, Dario; Viaggi, Bruno; Kuriyama, Akira; Picetti, Edoardo; Ball, Chad; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Ceresoli, Marco; Turri, Bruno; Jain, Sumita; Palombo, Carlo; Guirao, Xavier; Rodrigues, Gabriel; Gachabayov, Mahir; Machado, Fernando; Eftychios, Lostoridis; Kanj, Souha S.; Di Carlo, Isidoro; Di Saverio, Salomone; Khokha, Vladimir; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Massalou, Damien; Forfori, Francesco; Corradi, Francesco; Delibegovic, Samir; Machain Vega, Gustavo M.; Fantoni, Massimo; Demetriades, Demetrios; Kapoor, Garima; Kluger, Yoram; Ansari, Shamshul; Maier, Ron; Leppaniemi, Ari; Hardcastle, Timothy; Vereczkei, Andras; Karamagioli, Evika; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Pistello, Mauro; Sakakushev, Boris E.; Navsaria, Pradeep H.; Galeiras, Rita; Yahya, Ali I.; Osipov, Aleksei V.; Dimitrov, Evgeni; Doklestić, Krstina; Pisano, Michele; Malacarne, Paolo; Carcoforo, Paolo; Sibilla, Maria G.; Kryvoruchko, Igor A.; Bonavina, Luigi; Kim, Jae I.; Shelat, Vishal G.; Czepiel, Jacek; Maseda, Emilio; Marwah, Sanjay; Chirica, Mircea; Biancofiore, Giandomenico; Podda, Mauro; Cobianchi, Lorenzo; Ansaloni, Luca; Fugazzola, Paola; Seretis, Charalampos; Gomez, Carlos A.; Tumietto, Fabio; Malbrain, Manu; Reichert, Martin; Augustin, Goran; Amato, Bruno; Puzziello, Alessandro; Hecker, Andreas; Gemignani, Angelo; Isik, Arda; Cucchetti, Alessandro; Nacoti, Mirco; Kopelman, Doron; Mesina, Cristian; Ghannam, Wagih; Ben-Ishay, Offir; Dhingra, Sameer; Coimbra, Raul; Moore, Ernest E.; Cui, Yunfeng; Quiodettis, Martha A.; Bala, Miklosh; Testini, Mario; Diaz, Jose; Girardis, Massimo; Biffl, Walter L.; Hecker, Matthias; Sall, Ibrahima; Boggi, Ugo; Materazzi, Gabriele; Ghiadoni, Lorenzo; Matsumoto, Junichi; Zuidema, Wietse P.; Ivatury, Rao; Enani, Mushira A.; Litvin, Andrey; Al-Hasan, Majdi N.; Demetrashvili, Zaza; Baraket, Oussama; Ordoñez, Carlos A.; Negoi, Ionut; Kiguba, Ronald; Memish, Ziad A.; Elmangory, Mutasim M.; Tolonen, Matti; Das, Korey; Ribeiro, Julival; O’Connor, Donal B.; Tan, Boun K.; Van Goor, Harry; Baral, Suman; De Simone, Belinda; Corbella, Davide; Brambillasca, Pietro; Scaglione, Michelangelo; Basolo, Fulvio; De’Angelis, Nicola; Bendinelli, Cino; Weber, Dieter; Pagani, Leonardo; Monti, Cinzia; Baiocchi, Gianluca; Chiarugi, Massimo; Catena, Fausto; Sartelli, Massimo
    Abstract On January 2020, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The world has faced a worldwide spread crisis and is still dealing with it. The present paper represents a white paper concerning the tough lessons we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, an international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making. With the present paper, international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Correction: ECLAPTE: Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency—2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings
    (2023-11-27) Frassini, Simone; Cobianchi, Lorenzo; Fugazzola, Paola; Biffl, Walter L.; Coccolini, Federico; Damaskos, Dimitrios; Moore, Ernest E.; Kluger, Yoram; Ceresoli, Marco; Coimbra, Raul; Davies, Justin; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Di Carlo, Isidoro; Hardcastle, Timothy C.; Isik, Arda; Chiarugi, Massimo; Gurusamy, Kurinchi; Maier, Ronald V.; Segovia Lohse, Helmut A.; Jeekel, Hans; Boermeester, Marja A.; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Inaba, Kenji; Weber, Dieter G.; Augustin, Goran; Bonavina, Luigi; Velmahos, George; Sartelli, Massimo; Di Saverio, Salomone; Ten Broek, Richard P. G.; Granieri, Stefano; Dal Mas, Francesca; Farè, Camilla N.; Peverada, Jacopo; Zanghì, Simone; Viganò, Jacopo; Tomasoni, Matteo; Dominioni, Tommaso; Cicuttin, Enrico; Hecker, Andreas; Tebala, Giovanni D.; Galante, Joseph M.; Wani, Imtiaz; Khokha, Vladimir; Sugrue, Michael; Scalea, Thomas M.; Tan, Edward; Malangoni, Mark A.; Pararas, Nikolaos; Podda, Mauro; De Simone, Belinda; Ivatury, Rao; Cui, Yunfeng; Kashuk, Jeffry; Peitzman, Andrew; Kim, Fernando; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Sganga, Gabriele; Chiara, Osvaldo; Kelly, Michael D.; Marzi, Ingo; Picetti, Edoardo; Agnoletti, Vanni; De’Angelis, Nicola; Campanelli, Giampiero; de Moya, Marc; Litvin, Andrey; Martínez-Pérez, Aleix; Sall, Ibrahima; Rizoli, Sandro; Tomadze, Gia; Sakakushev, Boris; Stahel, Philip F.; Civil, Ian; Shelat, Vishal; Costa, David; Chichom-Mefire, Alain; Latifi, Rifat; Chirica, Mircea; Amico, Francesco; Pardhan, Amyn; Seenarain, Vidya; Boyapati, Nikitha; Hatz, Basil; Ackermann, Travis; Abeyasundara, Sandun; Fenton, Linda; Plani, Frank; Sarvepalli, Rohit; Rouhbakhshfar, Omid; Caleo, Pamela; Ho-Ching Yau, Victor; Clement, Kristenne; Christou, Erasmia; Castillo, Ana M. G.; Gosal, Preet K. S.; Balasubramaniam, Sunder; Hsu, Jeremy; Banphawatanarak, Kamon; Pisano, Michele; Toro, Adriana; Michele, Altomare; Cioffi, Stefano P. B.; Spota, Andrea; Catena, Fausto; Ansaloni, Luca
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    COVID-19 the showdown for mass casualty preparedness and management: the Cassandra Syndrome
    (2020-04-09) Coccolini, Federico; Sartelli, Massimo; Kluger, Yoram; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Karamagioli, Evika; Moore, Ernest E; Biffl, Walter L; Peitzman, Andrew; Hecker, Andreas; Chirica, Mircea; Damaskos, Dimitrios; Ordonez, Carlos; Vega, Felipe; Fraga, Gustavo P; Chiarugi, Massimo; Di Saverio, Salomone; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Mefire, Alain C; Leppaniemi, Ari; Khokha, Vladimir; Sakakushev, Boris; Catena, Rodolfo; Coimbra, Raul; Ansaloni, Luca; Corbella, Davide; Catena, Fausto
    Abstract Since December 2019, the world is potentially facing one of the most difficult infectious situations of the last decades. COVID-19 epidemic warrants consideration as a mass casualty incident (MCI) of the highest nature. An optimal MCI/disaster management should consider all four phases of the so-called disaster cycle: mitigation, planning, response, and recovery. COVID-19 outbreak has demonstrated the worldwide unpreparedness to face a global MCI. This present paper thus represents a call for action to solicitate governments and the Global Community to actively start effective plans to promote and improve MCI management preparedness in general, and with an obvious current focus on COVID-19.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    ECLAPTE: Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency—2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings
    (2023-07-26) Frassini, Simone; Cobianchi, Lorenzo; Fugazzola, Paola; Biffl, Walter L.; Coccolini, Federico; Damaskos, Dimitrios; Moore, Ernest E.; Kluger, Yoram; Ceresoli, Marco; Coimbra, Raul; Davies, Justin; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Di Carlo, Isidoro; Hardcastle, Timothy C.; Isik, Arda; Chiarugi, Massimo; Gurusamy, Kurinchi; Maier, Ronald V.; Segovia Lohse, Helmut A.; Jeekel, Hans; Boermeester, Marja A.; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Inaba, Kenji; Weber, Dieter G.; Augustin, Goran; Bonavina, Luigi; Velmahos, George; Sartelli, Massimo; Di Saverio, Salomone; Ten Broek, Richard P. G.; Granieri, Stefano; Dal Mas, Francesca; Farè, Camilla N.; Peverada, Jacopo; Zanghì, Simone; Viganò, Jacopo; Tomasoni, Matteo; Dominioni, Tommaso; Cicuttin, Enrico; Hecker, Andreas; Tebala, Giovanni D.; Galante, Joseph M.; Wani, Imtiaz; Khokha, Vladimir; Sugrue, Michael; Scalea, Thomas M.; Tan, Edward; Malangoni, Mark A.; Pararas, Nikolaos; Podda, Mauro; De Simone, Belinda; Ivatury, Rao; Cui, Yunfeng; Kashuk, Jeffry; Peitzman, Andrew; Kim, Fernando; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Sganga, Gabriele; Chiara, Osvaldo; Kelly, Michael D.; Marzi, Ingo; Picetti, Edoardo; Agnoletti, Vanni; De’Angelis, Nicola; Campanelli, Giampiero; de Moya, Marc; Litvin, Andrey; Martínez-Pérez, Aleix; Sall, Ibrahima; Rizoli, Sandro; Tomadze, Gia; Sakakushev, Boris; Stahel, Philip F.; Civil, Ian; Shelat, Vishal; Costa, David; Chichom-Mefire, Alain; Latifi, Rifat; Chirica, Mircea; Amico, Francesco; Pardhan, Amyn; Seenarain, Vidya; Boyapati, Nikitha; Hatz, Basil; Ackermann, Travis; Abeyasundara, Sandun; Fenton, Linda; Plani, Frank; Sarvepalli, Rohit; Rouhbakhshfar, Omid; Caleo, Pamela; Ho-Ching Yau, Victor; Clement, Kristenne; Christou, Erasmia; Castillo, Ana M. G.; Gosal, Preet K. S.; Balasubramaniam, Sunder; Hsu, Jeremy; Banphawatanarak, Kamon; Pisano, Michele; Adriana, Toro; Michele, Altomare; Cioffi, Stefano P. B.; Spota, Andrea; Catena, Fausto; Ansaloni, Luca
    Abstract Laparotomy incisions provide easy and rapid access to the peritoneal cavity in case of emergency surgery. Incisional hernia (IH) is a late manifestation of the failure of abdominal wall closure and represents frequent complication of any abdominal incision: IHs can cause pain and discomfort to the patients but also clinical serious sequelae like bowel obstruction, incarceration, strangulation, and necessity of reoperation. Previous guidelines and indications in the literature consider elective settings and evidence about laparotomy closure in emergency settings is lacking. This paper aims to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) project called ECLAPTE (Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency): the final manuscript includes guidelines on the closure of emergency laparotomy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document
    (2022-10-12) Podda, Mauro; De Simone, Belinda; Ceresoli, Marco; Virdis, Francesco; Favi, Francesco; Wiik Larsen, Johannes; Coccolini, Federico; Sartelli, Massimo; Pararas, Nikolaos; Beka, Solomon G.; Bonavina, Luigi; Bova, Raffaele; Pisanu, Adolfo; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Balogh, Zsolt; Chiara, Osvaldo; Wani, Imtiaz; Stahel, Philip; Di Saverio, Salomone; Scalea, Thomas; Soreide, Kjetil; Sakakushev, Boris; Amico, Francesco; Martino, Costanza; Hecker, Andreas; de’Angelis, Nicola; Chirica, Mircea; Galante, Joseph; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Kluger, Yoram; Bensard, Denis; Ansaloni, Luca; Fraga, Gustavo; Civil, Ian; Tebala, Giovanni D.; Di Carlo, Isidoro; Cui, Yunfeng; Coimbra, Raul; Agnoletti, Vanni; Sall, Ibrahima; Tan, Edward; Picetti, Edoardo; Litvin, Andrey; Damaskos, Dimitrios; Inaba, Kenji; Leung, Jeffrey; Maier, Ronald; Biffl, Walt; Leppaniemi, Ari; Moore, Ernest; Gurusamy, Kurinchi; Catena, Fausto
    Abstract Background In 2017, the World Society of Emergency Surgery published its guidelines for the management of adult and pediatric patients with splenic trauma. Several issues regarding the follow-up of patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM remained unsolved. Methods Using a modified Delphi method, we sought to explore ongoing areas of controversy in the NOM of splenic trauma and reach a consensus among a group of 48 international experts from five continents (Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania, America) concerning optimal follow-up strategies in patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM. Results Consensus was reached on eleven clinical research questions and 28 recommendations with an agreement rate ≥ 80%. Mobilization after 24 h in low-grade splenic trauma patients (WSES Class I, AAST Grades I–II) was suggested, while in patients with high-grade splenic injuries (WSES Classes II–III, AAST Grades III–V), if no other contraindications to early mobilization exist, safe mobilization of the patient when three successive hemoglobins 8 h apart after the first are within 10% of each other was considered safe according to the panel. The panel suggests adult patients to be admitted to hospital for 1 day (for low-grade splenic injuries—WSES Class I, AAST Grades I–II) to 3 days (for high-grade splenic injuries—WSES Classes II–III, AAST Grades III–V), with those with high-grade injuries requiring admission to a monitored setting. In the absence of specific complications, the panel suggests DVT and VTE prophylaxis with LMWH to be started within 48–72 h from hospital admission. The panel suggests splenic artery embolization (SAE) as the first-line intervention in patients with hemodynamic stability and arterial blush on CT scan, irrespective of injury grade. Regarding patients with WSES Class II blunt splenic injuries (AAST Grade III) without contrast extravasation, a low threshold for SAE has been suggested in the presence of risk factors for NOM failure. The panel also suggested angiography and eventual SAE in all hemodynamically stable adult patients with WSES Class III injuries (AAST Grades IV–V), even in the absence of CT blush, especially when concomitant surgery that requires change of position is needed. Follow-up imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound/CT scan in 48–72 h post-admission of trauma in splenic injuries WSES Class II (AAST Grade III) or higher treated with NOM was considered the best strategy for timely detection of vascular complications. Conclusion This consensus document could help guide future prospective studies aiming at validating the suggested strategies through the implementation of prospective trauma databases and the subsequent production of internationally endorsed guidelines on the issue.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines
    (2023-07-21) Coccolini, Federico; Sartelli, Massimo; Sawyer, Robert; Rasa, Kemal; Viaggi, Bruno; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Soreide, Kjetil; Hardcastle, Timothy; Gupta, Deepak; Bendinelli, Cino; Ceresoli, Marco; Shelat, Vishal G.; Broek, Richard t.; Baiocchi, Gian L.; Moore, Ernest E.; Sall, Ibrahima; Podda, Mauro; Bonavina, Luigi; Kryvoruchko, Igor A.; Stahel, Philip; Inaba, Kenji; Montravers, Philippe; Sakakushev, Boris; Sganga, Gabriele; Ballestracci, Paolo; Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.; Vincent, Jean-Louis; Pikoulis, Manos; Beka, Solomon G.; Doklestic, Krstina; Chiarugi, Massimo; Falcone, Marco; Bignami, Elena; Reva, Viktor; Demetrashvili, Zaza; Di Saverio, Salomone; Tolonen, Matti; Navsaria, Pradeep; Bala, Miklosh; Balogh, Zsolt; Litvin, Andrey; Hecker, Andreas; Wani, Imtiaz; Fette, Andreas; De Simone, Belinda; Ivatury, Rao; Picetti, Edoardo; Khokha, Vladimir; Tan, Edward; Ball, Chad; Tascini, Carlo; Cui, Yunfeng; Coimbra, Raul; Kelly, Michael; Martino, Costanza; Agnoletti, Vanni; Boermeester, Marja A.; De’Angelis, Nicola; Chirica, Mircea; Biffl, Walt L.; Ansaloni, Luca; Kluger, Yoram; Catena, Fausto; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W.
    Abstract Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their successful management typically requires intensive resource utilization, and despite the best therapies, morbidity and mortality remain high. One of the main issues required to appropriately treat IAI that differs from the other etiologies of sepsis is the frequent requirement to provide physical source control. Fortunately, dramatic advances have been made in this aspect of treatment. Historically, source control was left to surgeons only. With new technologies non-surgical less invasive interventional procedures have been introduced. Alternatively, in addition to formal surgery open abdomen techniques have long been proposed as aiding source control in severe intra-abdominal sepsis. It is ironic that while a lack or even delay regarding source control clearly associates with death, it is a concept that remains poorly described. For example, no conclusive definition of source control technique or even adequacy has been universally accepted. Practically, source control involves a complex definition encompassing several factors including the causative event, source of infection bacteria, local bacterial flora, patient condition, and his/her eventual comorbidities. With greater understanding of the systemic pathobiology of sepsis and the profound implications of the human microbiome, adequate source control is no longer only a surgical issue but one that requires a multidisciplinary, multimodality approach. Thus, while any breach in the GI tract must be controlled, source control should also attempt to control the generation and propagation of the systemic biomediators and dysbiotic influences on the microbiome that perpetuate multi-system organ failure and death. Given these increased complexities, the present paper represents the current opinions and recommendations for future research of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, of the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery of Surgical Infection Society Europe and Surgical Infection Society America regarding the concepts and operational adequacy of source control in intra-abdominal infections.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Strategies to prevent blood loss and reduce transfusion in emergency general surgery, WSES-AAST consensus paper
    (2024-07-16) Coccolini, Federico; Shander, Aryeh; Ceresoli, Marco; Moore, Ernest; Tian, Brian; Parini, Dario; Sartelli, Massimo; Sakakushev, Boris; Doklestich, Krstina; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Horer, Tal; Shelat, Vishal; Hardcastle, Timothy; Bignami, Elena; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Weber, Dieter; Kryvoruchko, Igor; Leppaniemi, Ari; Tan, Edward; Kessel, Boris; Isik, Arda; Cremonini, Camilla; Forfori, Francesco; Ghiadoni, Lorenzo; Chiarugi, Massimo; Ball, Chad; Ottolino, Pablo; Hecker, Andreas; Mariani, Diego; Melai, Ettore; Malbrain, Manu; Agostini, Vanessa; Podda, Mauro; Picetti, Edoardo; Kluger, Yoram; Rizoli, Sandro; Litvin, Andrey; Maier, Ron; Beka, Solomon G.; De Simone, Belinda; Bala, Miklosh; Perez, Aleix M.; Ordonez, Carlos; Bodnaruk, Zenon; Cui, Yunfeng; Calatayud, Augusto P.; de Angelis, Nicola; Amico, Francesco; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Damaskos, Dimitris; Coimbra, Raul; Chirica, Mircea; Biffl, Walter L.; Catena, Fausto
    Abstract Emergency general surgeons often provide care to severely ill patients requiring surgical interventions and intensive support. One of the primary drivers of morbidity and mortality is perioperative bleeding. In general, when addressing life threatening haemorrhage, blood transfusion can become an essential part of overall resuscitation. However, under all circumstances, indications for blood transfusion must be accurately evaluated. When patients decline blood transfusions, regardless of the reason, surgeons should aim to provide optimal care and respect and accommodate each patient’s values and target the best outcome possible given the patient’s desires and his/her clinical condition. The aim of this position paper was to perform a review of the existing literature and to provide comprehensive recommendations on organizational, surgical, anaesthetic, and haemostatic strategies that can be used to provide optimal peri-operative blood management, reduce, or avoid blood transfusions and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation
    (2021-02-23) Coccolini, Federico; Kluger, Yoram; Moore, Ernest E.; Maier, Ronald V.; Coimbra, Raul; Ordoñez, Carlos; Ivatury, Rao; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W.; Biffl, Walter; Sartelli, Massimo; Hecker, Andreas; Ansaloni, Luca; Leppaniemi, Ari; Reva, Viktor; Civil, Ian; Vega, Felipe; Chiarugi, Massimo; Chichom-Mefire, Alain; Sakakushev, Boris; Peitzman, Andrew; Chiara, Osvaldo; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Maegele, Marc; Miccoli, Mario; Chirica, Mircea; Khokha, Vladimir; Sugrue, Michael; Fraga, Gustavo P.; Otomo, Yasuhiro; Baiocchi, Gian L.; Catena, Fausto
    Abstract Introduction Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.