Browsing by Author "Inkpen, K."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
- ItemOpen AccessExploring Casual Tabletop Interactions(2004-03-29) Scott, S.; Carpendale, S.; Inkpen, K.Although there are many different types of tabletop displays in the literature, there are very few fundamentals known about what tabletop interfaces should look like or should behave. In order to obtain a better understanding of these questions, it seemed appropriate to back up a little from the interface design, and look at tasks and environments that we would like to support. Thus, several observational studies of traditional tabletop collaboration were undertaken to inform the design of collaborative tabletop interfaces. To get a broad understanding of tabletop collaboration in a in a variety of settings and tasks, these studies involved both informal and formal collaboration. This chapter describes the informal collaboration study, which involved participants playing tabletop games in a drop-in setting, inspired by kiosks setup in many science museums. The purpose of these studies was to gain a better understanding of how people use the space provided by a tabletop surface and how they use artifacts on a table during collaborative tabletop activities. This information can help to develop effective tabletop display technology to support face-to-face collaboration. There has been a variety of tabletop display systems developed in regent years (Durbin et al., 1998; Rekimoto & Saitoh, 1999; Streitz et al., 1999; Vernier et al., 2002; Wellner, 1993), but there has been little investigation of the usability of these systems for collaborative activities. More importantly, most of the interaction styles used in these systems have evolved from interaction styles used in existing vertical displays systems, such as the typical desktop system running Windows, Mac, or Unix. Two disadvantages of using these interaction styles to support collaboration on a tabletop display include: 1) the interaction styles have been optimized for use on a vertical display surface, and 2) they have been optimized for single-user interaction with the computer 9most computer-supported collaboration occurs over a network, with each collaborator interacting with their own computer). Vertical-display interfaces have a fixed orientation of the display artifacts (e.g. windows, dialog boxes) that has an obvious �top� and �bottom�. This does not allow easy viewing for multiple people who are seated at various sides of a tabletop display. Single-user interfaces usually have only one of each type of input device (e.g., one mouse, one keyboard). This does not allow concurrent interaction for multiple users, which collaboration researchers have shown occurs when people interact in non-technology environments (using pen and paper) (Tang, 1991) and in technology environments that provide support for multi-user, concurrent interaction (Scott et al., 2000). Understanding how people interact with artifacts and with the space on the table in a non-technology environment can help us develop tabletop display systems that support natural collaborative behavior around a horizontal surface, instead of trying to evolve technology that has been optimized for other uses. The first study employed an ethnographic-style methodology, where hand-written observations were taken while people performed a variety of simple, non-technological, collaborative tabletop activities in a casual, drop-in activity area.
- ItemOpen AccessTerritoriality in Collaborative Tabletop Workspaces(2004-03-29) Scott, S.; Carpendale, S.; Inkpen, K.Researchers seeking alternatives to traditional desktop computers have begun exploring the potential collaborative benefits of digital tabletop displays. However, there are still many open issues related to the design of collaborative tabletop interfaces, such as whether these systems should automatically orient tabletop items or enforce ownership of tabletop content. Understanding the natural interaction practices that people use during tabletop collaboration with traditional media (e.g., pen and paper) can help to address these issues. Interfaces that are modeled on these practices will have the additional advantage of supporting the interaction skills people have developed over years of collaborating at traditional tables. To gain a deeper understanding of these interaction practices we conducted two observational studies of traditional tabletop collaboration in both casual and formal settings. Our results reveal that collaborators use three types of tabletop territories to help coordinate their interactions within the shared tabletop workspace: personal, group, and storage territories. Findings from a spatial analysis of collaborators tabletop interactions reveal important properties of these tabletop territories and the role that they play in the collaboration process.
- ItemMetadata onlyWaaZaam! Supporting Creative Play at a Distance in Customized Video Environments(ACM, 2014) Hunter, S.; Maes, P.; Tang, A.; Inkpen, K.We present the design, implementation and evaluation of WaaZam, a video mediated communication system designed to support creative play in personalized environments. Users can interact together in sets composed of digital assets layered in 3D space. The goal of the project is to support creative play and increase social engagement during video sessions of geographically separated families. We focus particularly on understanding the value of customization for families with children ages 6-12. We present interviews with creativity experts, a pilot study and a formal evaluation of families playing together in four conditions: separate windows, merged windows, digital play sets, and personalized digital environments. We found that playing in the same video space enables new activities and increases social engagement for families. Personalization allows families to customize environments for their needs and supports more creative play activities that embody the imagination of the child.