Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDoughney, James R.eng
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-22T15:33:11Z
dc.date.available2010-06-22T15:33:11Z
dc.date.issued2005-05-02
dc.identifier.citationDoughney, J. (2005). Moral description: Overcoming the fact-value dichotomy in social research. eCOMMUNITY: International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, 2(2), 6-12.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/47876
dc.descriptionCopyright © Masood Zangeneh, Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Mental Health & Addictioneng
dc.description.abstractValues in social research are a vexed question. However, they cannot and should not be avoided. This article argues against the familiar fact-value dichotomy and presents a cognitive approach to values based inter alia on the views of the philosophers Julius Kovesi (1967) and Hilary Putnam (1990, 2002) and the economist philosopher Amartya Sen (1982, 1987). The article concludes that rejecting the fact-value dichotomy does not mean that "anything goes." On the contrary, it proposes reuniting facts and values in a common, factually-grounded and rational cognitive enterprise.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publishereCOMMUNITY: International Journal of Mental Health & Addictioneng
dc.subjectSocial sciences -- Research -- Moral and ethical aspectseng
dc.subject.otherGambling Literature
dc.titleMoral Description: Overcoming the Fact-Value Dichotomy in Social Researcheng
dc.typejournal article
dc.description.refereedYeseng
dc.publisher.corporateVictoria University, Australiaeng
dc.publisher.facultyVictoria University, Australiaeng
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/9671
thesis.degree.disciplineVictoria University, Australiaeng


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record