• Information Technology
  • Human Resources
  • Careers
  • Giving
  • Library
  • Bookstore
  • Active Living
  • Continuing Education
  • Go Dinos
  • UCalgary Maps
  • UCalgary Directory
  • Academic Calendar
My UCalgary
Webmail
D2L
ARCHIBUS
IRISS
  • Faculty of Arts
  • Cumming School of Medicine
  • Faculty of Environmental Design
  • Faculty of Graduate Studies
  • Haskayne School of Business
  • Faculty of Kinesiology
  • Faculty of Law
  • Faculty of Nursing
  • Faculty of Nursing (Qatar)
  • Schulich School of Engineering
  • Faculty of Science
  • Faculty of Social Work
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
  • Werklund School of Education
  • Information TechnologiesIT
  • Human ResourcesHR
  • Careers
  • Giving
  • Library
  • Bookstore
  • Active Living
  • Continuing Education
  • Go Dinos
  • UCalgary Maps
  • UCalgary Directory
  • Academic Calendar
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources
View Item 
  •   PRISM Home
  • Haskayne School of Business
  • Haskayne School of Business Research & Publications
  • View Item
  •   PRISM Home
  • Haskayne School of Business
  • Haskayne School of Business Research & Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

How do you spell relief? Re-writing wills in Canada

Thumbnail
Download
Bowal_How_do2000_LawNow.pdf (85.42Kb)
Download Record
Download to EndNote/RefMan (RIS)
Download to BibTex
Author
Bowal, Peter
Accessioned
2010-08-13T16:05:32Z
Available
2010-08-13T16:05:32Z
Issued
2000
Subject
Wills
Type
journal article
Metadata
Show full item record

Abstract
Imagine the following typical scenario. A woman aged 62 married a man in 1980 when he was aged 70. Both had two adult children from previous marriages. They separated in 1984 and divided the family assets, each receiving $28,000. Later that year she made a will leaving her entire estate to her two independent adult children. The couple resumed cohabitation soon after. The wife died in 1992, leaving an estate worth $18,000. One of her children was then in financially comfortable circumstances, the other less so. The surviving husband had pension income of $1,296 per month and savings of $22,000. He had used most of the funds received at the time of the 1984 separation to pay for his wife's medical expenses. After her death, he sued to receive money from her estate. He lost at trial and appealed. Held, on appeal, the only obligation owed by the wife during her lifetime was to her husband. He had expended his funds for her benefit, the estate was modest and the moral claims of the testator's children, who had not contributed to the estate, were not very high. In the circumstances, the testator failed to make "adequate, just and equitable" provision for her husband. He was entitled to the entire estate (Tweedale v. Tweedale Estate 1995). An 85 year old widower had been left $1 by his wife because he had deserted her to live with another woman. The main asset of the wife's estate was the matrimonial home, which had been bought in 1927 and registered in the wife's name although it had been paid for with plaintiff's money. The couple lived in the house continuously, except in 1976 when he deserted his wife and lived with another woman until 6 months before his wife died. The house was left to their sons. The plaintiff's present income was $3,600 from old age security benefits and $5,000 interest from his bank account. The widower was entitled to a life interest in the house. Evidence indicated the plaintiff had mistreated his wife and had breached his marital duties to her by living with another woman. The wife had agreed to a reconciliation prior to her death, however, and the house, which was the main asset of her estate, had been purchased and maintained by him. Having regard to these factors, the plaintiff's age, and the fact that he lived comfortably because the house was available to live in, he was entitled to a life estate in the house (Jensen v. Jensen 1982). One's moral obligation to dependents is judged based upon society's reasonable expectations of what a judicious person would do in the circumstances by reference to contemporary community standards. The delicate balancing act is not dealing with the cases of obvious need and ability to support. Rather it is where need is equivocal or minimal only by reference to how much the supporter had and how much was left to others. The judge then determines the role of the moral obligation to over-ride the deceased's final testamentary wishes and "claw back" some or all of the estate on moral grounds, not financial need.
Refereed
No
Article deposited after permissions was granted by the editor of LawNow magazine, 06/28/2010.
 
Citation
Bowal, Peter, "How do you spell relief? Re-writing wills in Canada", Law Now, Oct/Nov 2000, Vol. 25, Iss. 2; pg. 27.
Corporate
University of Calgary
Faculty
Haskayne School of Business
Url
http://lawnow.org/home/
Publisher
Legal Resource Centre of Alberta Ltd. (LRC)
Doi
http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/34066
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1880/48065
Collections
  • Haskayne School of Business Research & Publications

Browse

All of PRISMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Download Results

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

  • Email
  • SMS
  • 403.220.8895
  • Live Chat

Energize: The Campaign for Eyes High

Privacy Policy
Website feedback

University of Calgary
2500 University Drive NW
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
CANADA

Copyright © 2017