Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The rate of false signals in X-bar control charts with estimated limits
Authors: Bischak, Diane
Trietsch, Dan
Keywords: Average run length;Control limits
Issue Date: 2007
Publisher: American Society for Quality
Citation: Diane P Bischak, & Dan Trietsch. (2007). The Rate of False Signals in X-bar Control Charts with Estimated Limits. Journal of Quality Technology, 39(1), 54-65.
Abstract: The in-control statistical properties of X-bar charts have usually been studied from the perspective of the average run length (ARL) until the first (false) signal, known as the in-control ARL. We argue that the ARL is a confusing concept when used with charts with estimated limits and that the rate of false signals (RFS), which focuses on the behavior of charts during extended use, is more intuitive. We use the RFS to illustrate graphically the dangers of using too few subgroups to estimate control limits. We also discuss diffidence charts, which make the inherent uncertainty concerning RFS observable to the practitioner and thus help the practitioner determine what is an acceptable number of subgroups for a given charting application.
Description: Article deposited after permission was granted by the American Society for Quality Control, August 31, 2011.
ISSN: 0022-4065
Appears in Collections:Bischak, Diane

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bischak_Rate_Signals_2007_publishercopy.pdf946.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.