By 2022, a change in the form of government from unitary to federal will likely happen in the Philippines, a nation of 104 million. Although decentralization is not new to the country owing to the passage of the Local Government Code of 1991, the transition will have major policy implications on the assignment of expenditure and revenue (taxation) responsibilities for government functions. This study focuses on the technical and vocational education and training (TVET), an important component of the Philippine Government’s national strategy for economic development and poverty alleviation. TVET governance in the Philippines is placed under the authority of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA), an agency attached to the national government which operates a network of over a hundred TVET training schools and institutes. With the impending shift to a federal system, TESDA needs to formulate a decentralization strategy, determining which sub-functions of TVET governance should be retained at the national level, devolved/transferred to subnational governments, and shared between the two levels government. This paper maintains that in addressing these policy issues, the Philippine Government should be guided by the principles of fiscal federalism and informed by existing TVET vi decentralization models in federal countries worldwide. This paper utilizes comparative institutional analysis, an analytical framework that examines existing institutional arrangements in some jurisdictions to inform policy formulation elsewhere. TVET governance in eight federal countries are analyzed by answering this question: Which sub-functions are assigned to what level of government? The sub-functions of the TVET system are: a) policy formulation and planning, b) standard-setting and regulatory, c) financing/contracting and d) provision of TVET services to clients. Based on the findings of the study, policy makers in the Philippines are enjoined to consider the following policy recommendations on decentralizing TVET under the proposed federal system: a. TVET policy formulation, planning, standard-setting and regulatory functions should be assigned solely to the national government so that TVET governance is harmonized across jurisdictions, and to be consistent with the national government’s equity goals; b. Financing/contracting for TVET can initially be assigned as a “shared function” between the national and subnational governments; however, in the long term, the subnational governments should develop their local revenue generation capacity and eventually be responsible for TVET financing/ contracting in their jurisdictions. Policy makers should also explore alternative models for TVET financing such as inclusion of TVET in the existing Special Education Fund (SEF) and establishing a TVET Training Fund; vii c. Provision of TVET training services can initially be a “shared function” between the two levels of government; however, as experiences of federal countries clearly show, the primary responsibility of providing TVET services to clients should rest with the subnational governments.