Kaoutskaia, AnnaShurrab, MohammedAmit, GuyParkash, RatikaExner, DerekToal, SatishSterns, LaurenceSarrazin, Jean-FrancoisChauhan, VijaySultan, OmarNair, GirishDeyell, MarcMacle, LaurentKlassen, SteveGlover, BenedictCrystal, Eugene2021-05-092021-05-092021-05-06BMC Health Services Research. 2021 May 06;21(1):435http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113385https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/44967Abstract Background/purpose : Interventional cardiac electrophysiology (EP) is a rapidly evolving field in Canada; a nationwide registry was established in 2011 to conduct a periodic review of resource allocation. Methods The registry collects annual data on EP lab infrastructure, imaging, tools, human resources, procedural volumes, success rates, and wait times. Leading physicians from each EP lab were contacted electronically; participation was voluntary. Results All Canadian EP centres were identified (n = 30); 50 and 45 % of active centres participated in the last 2 instalments of the registry. A mean of 508 ± 270 standard and complex catheter ablation procedures were reported annually for 2015–2016 by all responding centres. The most frequently performed ablation targets atrial fibrillation (PVI) arrhythmia accounting for 36 % of all procedures (mean = 164 ± 85). The number of full time physicians ranges between 1 and 7 per centre, (mean = 4). The mean wait time to see an electrophysiologist for an initial non-urgent consult is 23 weeks. The wait time between an EP consult and ablation date is 17.8 weeks for simple ablation, and 30.1 weeks for AF ablation. On average centres have 2 (range: 1–4) rooms equipped for ablations; each centre uses the EP lab an average of 7 shifts per week. While diagnostic studies and radiofrequency ablations are performed in all centres, point-by-point cryoablation is available in 85 % centres; 38 % of the respondents use circular ablation techniques. Conclusions This initiative provides contemporary data on invasive electrophysiology lab practices. The EP registry provides activity benchmarks on national trends and practices.Journal Article2021-05-09enThe Author(s)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06441-0