Haji, Ishtiyaque2022-01-122022-01-122021-09-03Haji, I. (2021). Blameworthiness and Time, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 98(3), 446-462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-00000137http://hdl.handle.net/1880/114272https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/43687The following theses concerning moral obligation are widely accepted. Future Obligation: it is possible that at some time you are morally obligated to do something that you have not yet done but will do at a future time. Obligation-Changeability: it is possible that although it is obligatory, at some specified time, for you to do something later, at a time pursuant to this specified time you no longer have this obligation. The author argues that analogous theses concerning moral blameworthiness are true too: it’s possible that you may now be blameworthy for something you have not yet done but will do, and that blameworthiness can change with the passage of time.engUnless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.Cambridge actionschanging obligationsindeterminismprospective blameworthinessBlameworthiness and Timejournal articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18756735-00000137