Browsing by Author "Abu-Zidan, Fikri M"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group(2018-06-19) ten Broek, Richard P G; Krielen, Pepijn; Di Saverio, Salomone; Coccolini, Federico; Biffl, Walter L; Ansaloni, Luca; Velmahos, George C; Sartelli, Massimo; Fraga, Gustavo P; Kelly, Michael D; Moore, Frederick A; Peitzman, Andrew B; Leppaniemi, Ari; Moore, Ernest E; Jeekel, Johannes; Kluger, Yoram; Sugrue, Michael; Balogh, Zsolt J; Bendinelli, Cino; Civil, Ian; Coimbra, Raul; De Moya, Mark; Ferrada, Paula; Inaba, Kenji; Ivatury, Rao; Latifi, Rifat; Kashuk, Jeffry L; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Maier, Ron; Rizoli, Sandro; Sakakushev, Boris; Scalea, Thomas; Søreide, Kjetil; Weber, Dieter; Wani, Imtiaz; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; De’Angelis, Nicola; Piscioneri, Frank; Galante, Joseph M; Catena, Fausto; van Goor, HarryAbstract Background Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency, causing high morbidity and even some mortality. The adhesions causing such bowel obstructions are typically the footprints of previous abdominal surgical procedures. The present paper presents a revised version of the Bologna guidelines to evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of ASBO. The working group has added paragraphs on prevention of ASBO and special patient groups. Methods The guideline was written under the auspices of the World Society of Emergency Surgery by the ASBO working group. A systematic literature search was performed prior to the update of the guidelines to identify relevant new papers on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ASBO. Literature was critically appraised according to an evidence-based guideline development method. Final recommendations were approved by the workgroup, taking into account the level of evidence of the conclusion. Recommendations Adhesion formation might be reduced by minimally invasive surgical techniques and the use of adhesion barriers. Non-operative treatment is effective in most patients with ASBO. Contraindications for non-operative treatment include peritonitis, strangulation, and ischemia. When the adhesive etiology of obstruction is unsure, or when contraindications for non-operative management might be present, CT is the diagnostic technique of choice. The principles of non-operative treatment are nil per os, naso-gastric, or long-tube decompression, and intravenous supplementation with fluids and electrolytes. When operative treatment is required, a laparoscopic approach may be beneficial for selected cases of simple ASBO. Younger patients have a higher lifetime risk for recurrent ASBO and might therefore benefit from application of adhesion barriers as both primary and secondary prevention. Discussion This guideline presents recommendations that can be used by surgeons who treat patients with ASBO. Scientific evidence for some aspects of ASBO management is scarce, in particular aspects relating to special patient groups. Results of a randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for ASBO are awaited.Item Open Access Closed Or Open after Source Control Laparotomy for Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis (the COOL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial(2018-06-22) Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Coccolini, Federico; Ansaloni, Luca; Roberts, Derek J; Tolonen, Matti; McKee, Jessica L; Leppaniemi, Ari; Faris, Peter; Doig, Christopher J; Catena, Fausto; Fabian, Timothy; Jenne, Craig N; Chiara, Osvaldo; Kubes, Paul; Manns, Braden; Kluger, Yoram; Fraga, Gustavo P; Pereira, Bruno M; Diaz, Jose J; Sugrue, Michael; Moore, Ernest E; Ren, Jianan; Ball, Chad G; Coimbra, Raul; Balogh, Zsolt J; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Dixon, Elijah; Biffl, Walter; MacLean, Anthony; Ball, Ian; Drover, John; McBeth, Paul B; Posadas-Calleja, Juan G; Parry, Neil G; Di Saverio, Salomone; Ordonez, Carlos A; Xiao, Jimmy; Sartelli, MassimoAbstract Background Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. Principles of treatment include early antibiotic administration and operative source control. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with active negative peritoneal pressure therapy (ANPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and ameliorate the systemic damage from SCIAS. Although there is now a biologic rationale for such an intervention as well as non-standardized and erratic clinical utilization, this remains a novel therapy with potential side effects and clinical equipoise. Methods The Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) study will constitute a prospective randomized controlled trial that will randomly allocate eligible surgical patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or use of the OA with application of an ANPTT dressing. Patients will be eligible if they have free uncontained intra-peritoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR a Predisposition-Infection-Response-Organ Dysfunction Score ≥ 3 or a World-Society-of-Emergency-Surgery-Sepsis-Severity-Score ≥ 8. The primary outcome will be 90-day survival. Secondary outcomes will be logistical, physiologic, safety, bio-mediators, microbiological, quality of life, and health-care costs. Secondary outcomes will include days free of ICU, ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and hospital at 30 days from the index laparotomy. Physiologic secondary outcomes will include changes in intensive care unit illness severity scores after laparotomy. Bio-mediator outcomes for participating centers will involve measurement of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10, procalcitonin, activated protein C (APC), high-mobility group box protein-1, complement factors, and mitochondrial DNA. Economic outcomes will comprise standard costing for utilization of health-care resources. Discussion Although facial closure after SCIAS is considered the current standard of care, many reports are suggesting that OA management may improve outcomes in these patients. This trial will be powered to demonstrate a mortality difference in this highly lethal and morbid condition to ensure critically ill patients are receiving the best care possible and not being harmed by inappropriate therapies based on opinion only. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03163095 .Item Open Access Correction to: Ethical considerations in conducting surgical research in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis(2019-10-17) Doig, Christopher J; Page, Stacey A; McKee, Jessica L; Moore, Ernest E; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Carroll, Rosemary; Marshall, John C; Faris, Peter D; Tolonen, Matti; Catena, Fausto; Coccolini, Federico; Sartelli, Massimo; Ansaloni, Luca; Minor, Sam F; Peirera, Bruno M; Diaz, Jose J; Kirkpatrick, Andrew WThe original article [1] contained a typo in author, Federico Coccolini’s name. This has now been corrected.Item Open Access Ethical considerations in conducting surgical research in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis(2019-08-05) Doig, Christopher J; Page, Stacey A; McKee, Jessica L; Moore, Ernest E; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Carroll, Rosemary; Marshall, John C; Faris, Peter D; Tolonen, Matti; Catena, Fausto; Cocolini, Federico; Sartelli, Massimo; Ansaloni, Luca; Minor, Sam F; Peirera, Bruno M; Diaz, Jose J; Kirkpatrick, Andrew WAbstract Background Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has high mortality, thought due in part to progressive bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. Treatment includes early antibiotics and operative source control. At surgery, open abdomen management with negative-peritoneal-pressure therapy (NPPT) has been hypothesized to mitigate MOF and death, although clinical equipoise for this operative approach exists. The Closed or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) study ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ) will prospectively randomize eligible patients intra-operatively to formal abdominal closure or OA with NPTT. We review the ethical basis for conducting research in SCIAS. Main body Research in critically ill incapacitated patients is important to advance care. Conducting research among SCIAS is complicated due to the severity of illness including delirium, need for emergent interventions, diagnostic criteria confirmed only at laparotomy, and obtundation from anaesthesia. In other circumstances involving critically ill patients, clinical experts have worked closely with ethicists to apply principles that balance the rights of patients whilst simultaneously permitting inclusion in research. In Canada, the Tri-Council Policy Statement-2 (TCPS-2) describes six criteria that permit study enrollment and randomization in such situations: (a) serious threat to the prospective participant requires immediate intervention; (b) either no standard efficacious care exists or the research offers realistic possibility of direct benefit; (c) risks are not greater than that involved in standard care or are clearly justified by prospect for direct benefits; (d) prospective participant is unconscious or lacks capacity to understand the complexities of the research; (e) third-party authorization cannot be secured in sufficient time; and (f) no relevant prior directives are known to exist that preclude participation. TCPS-2 criteria are in principle not dissimilar to other (inter)national criteria. The COOL study will use waiver of consent to initiate enrollment and randomization, followed by surrogate or proxy consent, and finally delayed informed consent in subjects that survive and regain capacity. Conclusions A delayed consent mechanism is a practical and ethical solution to challenges in research in SCIAS. The ultimate goal of consent is to balance respect for patient participants and to permit participation in new trials with a reasonable opportunity for improved outcome and minimal risk of harm.Item Open Access Impact of trauma system structure on injury outcomes: a systematic review protocol(2017-01-21) Moore, Lynne; Champion, Howard; O’Reilly, Gerard; Leppaniemi, Ari; Cameron, Peter; Palmer, Cameron; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Gabbe, Belinda; Gaarder, Christine; Yanchar, Natalie; Stelfox, Henry T; Coimbra, Raul; Kortbeek, John; Noonan, Vanessa; Gunning, Amy; Leenan, Luke; Gordon, Malcolm; Khajanchi, Monty; Shemilt, Michèle; Porgo, Valérie; Turgeon, Alexis FAbstract Background Injury represents one of the greatest public health challenges of our time with over 5 million deaths and 100 million people temporarily or permanently disabled every year worldwide. The effectiveness of trauma systems in decreasing injury mortality and morbidity has been well demonstrated. However, the organisation of trauma care varies significantly across trauma systems and we know little about which components of trauma systems contribute to their effectiveness. The objective of the study described in this protocol is to systematically review evidence of the impact of trauma system components on clinically significant outcomes including mortality, function and disability, quality of life, and resource utilization. Methods We will perform a systematic review of studies evaluating the association between at least one trauma system component (e.g. accreditation by a central agency, interfacility transfer agreements) and at least one injury outcome (e.g. mortality, disability, resource use). We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE central, and BIOSIS/Web of Knowledge databases, thesis holdings, key injury organisation websites and conference proceedings for eligible studies. Pairs of independent reviewers will evaluate studies for eligibility and extract data from included articles. Methodological quality will be evaluated using elements of the ROBINS-I tool and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for non-randomized and randomized studies, respectively. Strength of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE tool. Discussion We expect to advance knowledge on the components of trauma systems that contribute to their effectiveness. This may lead to recommendations on trauma system structure that will help policy-makers make informed decisions as to where resources should be focused. The review may also lead to specific recommendations for future research efforts. Systematic review registration This protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 28-06-2016. PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016041336 Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42016041336 .Item Open Access Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines(2020-02-10) De Simone, Belinda; Sartelli, Massimo; Coccolini, Federico; Ball, Chad G; Brambillasca, Pietro; Chiarugi, Massimo; Campanile, Fabio C; Nita, Gabriela; Corbella, Davide; Leppaniemi, Ari; Boschini, Elena; Moore, Ernest E; Biffl, Walter; Peitzmann, Andrew; Kluger, Yoram; Sugrue, Michael; Fraga, Gustavo; Di Saverio, Salomone; Weber, Dieter; Sakakushev, Boris; Chiara, Osvaldo; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; ten Broek, Richard; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Wani, Imtiaz; Coimbra, Raul; Baiocchi, Gian L; Kelly, Micheal D; Ansaloni, Luca; Catena, FaustoAbstract Background Surgical site infections (SSI) represent a considerable burden for healthcare systems. They are largely preventable and multiple interventions have been proposed over past years in an attempt to prevent SSI. We aim to provide a position paper on Operative Room (OR) prevention of SSI in patients presenting with intra-abdominal infection to be considered a future addendum to the well-known World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infections. Methods The literature was searched for focused publications on SSI until March 2019. Critical analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group of experts; the literature review and the statements were evaluated by a Steering Committee of the WSES. Results Wound protectors and antibacterial sutures seem to have effective roles to prevent SSI in intra-abdominal infections. The application of negative-pressure wound therapy in preventing SSI can be useful in reducing postoperative wound complications. It is important to pursue normothermia with the available resources in the intraoperative period to decrease SSI rate. The optimal knowledge of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of antibiotics helps to decide when additional intraoperative antibiotic doses should be administered in patients with intra-abdominal infections undergoing emergency surgery to prevent SSI. Conclusions The current position paper offers an extensive overview of the available evidence regarding surgical site infection control and prevention in patients having intra-abdominal infections.Item Open Access Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference(2017-05-04) Sartelli, Massimo; Catena, Fausto; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Ansaloni, Luca; Biffl, Walter L; Boermeester, Marja A; Ceresoli, Marco; Chiara, Osvaldo; Coccolini, Federico; De Waele, Jan J; Di Saverio, Salomone; Eckmann, Christian; Fraga, Gustavo P; Giannella, Maddalena; Girardis, Massimo; Griffiths, Ewen A; Kashuk, Jeffry; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Khokha, Vladimir; Kluger, Yoram; Labricciosa, Francesco M; Leppaniemi, Ari; Maier, Ronald V; May, Addison K; Malangoni, Mark; Martin-Loeches, Ignacio; Mazuski, John; Montravers, Philippe; Peitzman, Andrew; Pereira, Bruno M; Reis, Tarcisio; Sakakushev, Boris; Sganga, Gabriele; Soreide, Kjetil; Sugrue, Michael; Ulrych, Jan; Vincent, Jean-Louis; Viale, Pierluigi; Moore, Ernest EAbstract This paper reports on the consensus conference on the management of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) which was held on July 23, 2016, in Dublin, Ireland, as a part of the annual World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) meeting. This document covers all aspects of the management of IAIs. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendation is used, and this document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference findings.Item Open Access Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) Study: a WSES observational study(2019-07-15) Sartelli, Massimo; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Labricciosa, Francesco M; Kluger, Yoram; Coccolini, Federico; Ansaloni, Luca; Leppäniemi, Ari; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Tolonen, Matti; Tranà, Cristian; Regimbeau, Jean-Marc; Hardcastle, Timothy; Koshy, Renol M; Abbas, Ashraf; Aday, Ulaş; Adesunkanmi, A. R K; Ajibade, Adesina; Akhmeteli, Lali; Akın, Emrah; Akkapulu, Nezih; Alotaibi, Alhenouf; Altintoprak, Fatih; Anyfantakis, Dimitrios; Atanasov, Boyko; Augustin, Goran; Azevedo, Constança; Bala, Miklosh; Balalis, Dimitrios; Baraket, Oussama; Baral, Suman; Barkai, Or; Beltran, Marcelo; Bini, Roberto; Bouliaris, Konstantinos; Caballero, Ana B; Calu, Valentin; Catani, Marco; Ceresoli, Marco; Charalampakis, Vasileios; Jusoh, Asri C; Chiarugi, Massimo; Cillara, Nicola; Cuesta, Raquel C; Cobuccio, Luigi; Cocorullo, Gianfranco; Colak, Elif; Conti, Luigi; Cui, Yunfeng; De Simone, Belinda; Delibegovic, Samir; Demetrashvili, Zaza; Demetriades, Demetrios; Dimova, Ana; Dogjani, Agron; Enani, Mushira; Farina, Federica; Ferrara, Francesco; Foghetti, Domitilla; Fontana, Tommaso; Fraga, Gustavo P; Gachabayov, Mahir; Gérard, Grelpois; Ghnnam, Wagih; Maurel, Teresa G; Gkiokas, Georgios; Gomes, Carlos A; Guner, Ali; Gupta, Sanjay; Hecker, Andreas; Hirano, Elcio S; Hodonou, Adrien; Hutan, Martin; Ilaschuk, Igor; Ioannidis, Orestis; Isik, Arda; Ivakhov, Georgy; Jain, Sumita; Jokubauskas, Mantas; Karamarkovic, Aleksandar; Kaushik, Robin; Kenig, Jakub; Khokha, Vladimir; Khokha, Denis; Kim, Jae I; Kong, Victor; Korkolis, Dimitris; Kruger, Vitor F; Kshirsagar, Ashok; Simões, Romeo L; Lanaia, Andrea; Lasithiotakis, Konstantinos; Leão, Pedro; Arellano, Miguel L; Listle, Holger; Litvin, Andrey; Lizarazu Pérez, Aintzane; Lopez-Tomassetti Fernandez, Eudaldo; Lostoridis, Eftychios; Luppi, Davide; Machain V, Gustavo M; Major, Piotr; Manatakis, Dimitrios; Reitz, Marianne M; Marinis, Athanasios; Marrelli, Daniele; Martínez-Pérez, Aleix; Marwah, Sanjay; McFarlane, Michael; Mesic, Mirza; Mesina, Cristian; Michalopoulos, Nickos; Misiakos, Evangelos; Moreira, Felipe G; Mouaqit, Ouadii; Muhtaroglu, Ali; Naidoo, Noel; Negoi, Ionut; Nikitina, Zane; Nikolopoulos, Ioannis; Nita, Gabriela-Elisa; Occhionorelli, Savino; Olaoye, Iyiade; Ordoñez, Carlos A; Ozkan, Zeynep; Pal, Ajay; Palini, Gian M; Papageorgiou, Kyriaki; Papagoras, Dimitris; Pata, Francesco; Pędziwiatr, Michał; Pereira, Jorge; Pereira Junior, Gerson A; Perrone, Gennaro; Pintar, Tadeja; Pisarska, Magdalena; Plehutsa, Oleksandr; Podda, Mauro; Poillucci, Gaetano; Quiodettis, Martha; Rahim, Tuba; Rios-Cruz, Daniel; Rodrigues, Gabriel; Rozov, Dmytry; Sakakushev, Boris; Sall, Ibrahima; Sazhin, Alexander; Semião, Miguel; Sharda, Taanya; Shelat, Vishal; Sinibaldi, Giovanni; Skicko, Dmitrijs; Skrovina, Matej; Stamatiou, Dimitrios; Stella, Marco; Strzałka, Marcin; Sydorchuk, Ruslan; Teixeira Gonsaga, Ricardo A; Tochie, Joel N; Tomadze, Gia; Ugoletti, Lara; Ulrych, Jan; Ümarik, Toomas; Uzunoglu, Mustafa Y; Vasilescu, Alin; Vaz, Osborne; Vereczkei, Andras; Vlad, Nutu; Walędziak, Maciej; Yahya, Ali I; Yalkin, Omer; Yilmaz, Tonguç U; Ünal, Ali E; Yuan, Kuo-Ching; Zachariah, Sanoop K; Žilinskas, Justas; Zizzo, Maurizio; Pattonieri, Vittoria; Baiocchi, Gian L; Catena, FaustoAbstract Background Timing and adequacy of peritoneal source control are the most important pillars in the management of patients with acute peritonitis. Therefore, early prognostic evaluation of acute peritonitis is paramount to assess the severity and establish a prompt and appropriate treatment. The objectives of this study were to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute peritonitis and to develop a warning score system, based on easily recognizable and assessable variables, globally accepted. Methods This worldwide multicentre observational study included 153 surgical departments across 56 countries over a 4-month study period between February 1, 2018, and May 31, 2018. Results A total of 3137 patients were included, with 1815 (57.9%) men and 1322 (42.1%) women, with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 28–66). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9%, with a median length of stay of 6 days (IQR 4–10). Using multivariable logistic regression, independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified: age > 80 years, malignancy, severe cardiovascular disease, severe chronic kidney disease, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, AVPU responsiveness scale (voice and unresponsive), blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) < 90% in air, platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3, and lactate > 4 mmol/l. These variables were used to create the PIPAS Severity Score, a bedside early warning score for patients with acute peritonitis. The overall mortality was 2.9% for patients who had scores of 0–1, 22.7% for those who had scores of 2–3, 46.8% for those who had scores of 4–5, and 86.7% for those who have scores of 7–8. Conclusions The simple PIPAS Severity Score can be used on a global level and can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure and mortality.Item Open Access The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections(2017-07-10) Sartelli, Massimo; Chichom-Mefire, Alain; Labricciosa, Francesco M; Hardcastle, Timothy; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Adesunkanmi, Abdulrashid K; Ansaloni, Luca; Bala, Miklosh; Balogh, Zsolt J; Beltrán, Marcelo A; Ben-Ishay, Offir; Biffl, Walter L; Birindelli, Arianna; Cainzos, Miguel A; Catalini, Gianbattista; Ceresoli, Marco; Che Jusoh, Asri; Chiara, Osvaldo; Coccolini, Federico; Coimbra, Raul; Cortese, Francesco; Demetrashvili, Zaza; Di Saverio, Salomone; Diaz, Jose J; Egiev, Valery N; Ferrada, Paula; Fraga, Gustavo P; Ghnnam, Wagih M; Lee, Jae G; Gomes, Carlos A; Hecker, Andreas; Herzog, Torsten; Kim, Jae I; Inaba, Kenji; Isik, Arda; Karamarkovic, Aleksandar; Kashuk, Jeffry; Khokha, Vladimir; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Kluger, Yoram; Koike, Kaoru; Kong, Victor Y; Leppaniemi, Ari; Machain, Gustavo M; Maier, Ronald V; Marwah, Sanjay; McFarlane, Michael E; Montori, Giulia; Moore, Ernest E; Negoi, Ionut; Olaoye, Iyiade; Omari, Abdelkarim H; Ordonez, Carlos A; Pereira, Bruno M; Pereira Júnior, Gerson A; Pupelis, Guntars; Reis, Tarcisio; Sakakushev, Boris; Sato, Norio; Segovia Lohse, Helmut A; Shelat, Vishal G; Søreide, Kjetil; Uhl, Waldemar; Ulrych, Jan; Van Goor, Harry; Velmahos, George C; Yuan, Kuo-Ching; Wani, Imtiaz; Weber, Dieter G; Zachariah, Sanoop K; Catena, FaustoAbstract Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and have been reported as major contributors to non-trauma deaths in the emergency departments worldwide. The cornerstones of effective treatment of IAIs are early recognition, adequate source control, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Prompt resuscitation of patients with ongoing sepsis is of utmost important. In hospitals worldwide, non-acceptance of, or lack of access to, accessible evidence-based practices and guidelines result in overall poorer outcome of patients suffering IAIs. The aim of this paper is to promote global standards of care in IAIs and update the 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.