Browsing by Author "Chibry, Nancy"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access 2019 International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating: Event Brief(2019-10-18) Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Chibry, NancyThis document documents the University of Calgary events to mark the 2019 International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating. It serves as an important historical reference of who was involved, as well as what activities were planned and delivered.Item Open Access Contract Cheating: A View from Three Calgary Post-Secondary Institutions(2019-05-27) Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Toye, Margaret A.; Chibry, Nancy; Rossi, SilviaA comparative exploration of how contract cheating is addressed at three Calgary post-secondary institutions.Item Open Access Contract Cheating: An Inter-Institutional Collaborative SoTL Project from Alberta(2018-11-10) Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Toye, Margaret A.; Rossi, Silvia; Chibry, NancyOur project showcases perspectives from three Alberta post-secondary institutions, using a collaborative action research approach to reflect upon and then develop interventions to advance awareness of, and responses to, contract cheating. Contract cheating includes, but is not limited to essay mills, custom writing services, assignment completion services and professional exam takers. Contract cheating also occurs when parents, partners or another student do the work for a learner. In short, contract cheating happens when students have someone else complete academic work on their behalf, but submit their work as if they had done it themselves. Our project is framed as an action research project that extends SoTL beyond the individual classroom to a broader institutional context. Using narratives, observations and reflection-on-action as data sources, we use informal interventions such as hallway conversations and in-class discussions, designed to help both faculty members and students develop greater awareness about what contract cheating is and why it deserves attention from a teaching and learning perspective. We also discuss institutional action, such as taking part in the International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating, as a formal way to raise awareness about contract cheating in higher education more broadly. We conclude with preliminary practical and evidence-informed recommendations for practitioners, educational developers and decision-makers.