Browsing by Author "Faulkner, Guy"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Development of a consensus statement on the role of the family in the physical activity, sedentary, and sleep behaviours of children and youth
    (2020-06-16) Rhodes, Ryan E; Guerrero, Michelle D; Vanderloo, Leigh M; Barbeau, Kheana; Birken, Catherine S; Chaput, Jean-Philippe; Faulkner, Guy; Janssen, Ian; Madigan, Sheri; Mâsse, Louise C; McHugh, Tara-Leigh; Perdew, Megan; Stone, Kelly; Shelley, Jacob; Spinks, Nora; Tamminen, Katherine A; Tomasone, Jennifer R; Ward, Helen; Welsh, Frank; Tremblay, Mark S
    Abstract Background Children and youth who meet the physical activity, sedentary, and sleep behaviour recommendations in the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines are more likely to have desirable physical and psychosocial health outcomes. Yet, few children and youth actually meet the recommendations. The family is a key source of influence that can affect lifestyle behaviours. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process used to develop the Consensus Statement on the Role of the Family in the Physical Activity, Sedentary, and Sleep Behaviours of Children and Youth (0–17 years) and present, explain, substantiate, and discuss the final Consensus Statement. Methods The development of the Consensus Statement included the establishment of a multidisciplinary Expert Panel, completion of six reviews (three literature, two scoping, one systematic review of reviews), custom data analyses of Statistics Canada’s Canadian Health Measures Survey, integration of related research identified by Expert Panel members, a stakeholder consultation, establishment of consensus, and the development of a media, public relations, communications and launch plan. Results Evidence from the literature reviews provided substantial support for the importance of family on children’s movement behaviours and highlighted the importance of inclusion of the entire family system as a source of influence and promotion of healthy child and youth movement behaviours. The Expert Panel incorporated the collective evidence from all reviews, the custom analyses, other related research identified, and stakeholder survey feedback, to develop a conceptual model and arrive at the Consensus Statement: Families can support children and youth in achieving healthy physical activity, sedentary and sleep behaviours by encouraging, facilitating, modelling, setting expectations and engaging in healthy movement behaviours with them. Other sources of influence are important (e.g., child care, school, health care, community, governments) and can support families in this pursuit. Conclusion Family is important for the support and promotion of healthy movement behaviours of children and youth. This Consensus Statement serves as a comprehensive, credible, and current synopsis of related evidence, recommendations, and resources for multiple stakeholders.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity: a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users
    (2023-12-07) Prince, Stephanie A.; Lang, Justin J.; de Groh, Margaret; Badland, Hannah; Barnett, Anthony; Littlejohns, Lori B.; Brandon, Nicholas C.; Butler, Gregory P.; Casu, Géna; Cerin, Ester; Colley, Rachel C.; de Lannoy, Louise; Demchenko, Iryna; Ellingwood, Holly N.; Evenson, Kelly R.; Faulkner, Guy; Fridman, Liraz; Friedenreich, Christine M.; Fuller, Daniel L.; Fuselli, Pamela; Giangregorio, Lora M.; Gupta, Neeru; Hino, Adriano A.; Hume, Clare; Isernhagen, Birgit; Jalaludin, Bin; Lakerveld, Jeroen; Larouche, Richard; Lemon, Stephenie C.; Loucaides, Constantinos A.; Maddock, Jay E.; McCormack, Gavin R.; Mehta, Aman; Milton, Karen; Mota, Jorge; Ngo, Victor D.; Owen, Neville; Oyeyemi, Adewale L.; Palmeira, António L.; Rainham, Daniel G.; Rhodes, Ryan E.; Ridgers, Nicola D.; Roosendaal, Inge; Rosenberg, Dori E.; Schipperijn, Jasper; Slater, Sandra J.; Storey, Kate E.; Tremblay, Mark S.; Tully, Mark A.; Vanderloo, Leigh M.; Veitch, Jenny; Vietinghoff, Christina; Whiting, Stephen; Winters, Meghan; Yang, Linchuan; Geneau, Robert
    Abstract Background The growth of urban dwelling populations globally has led to rapid increases of research and policy initiatives addressing associations between the built environment and physical activity (PA). Given this rapid proliferation, it is important to identify priority areas and research questions for moving the field forward. The objective of this study was to identify and compare research priorities on the built environment and PA among researchers and knowledge users (e.g., policy makers, practitioners). Methods Between September 2022 and April 2023, a three-round, modified Delphi survey was conducted among two independent panels of international researchers (n = 38) and knowledge users (n = 23) to identify similarities and differences in perceived research priorities on the built environment and PA and generate twin ‘top 10’ lists of the most important research needs. Results From a broad range of self-identified issues, both panels ranked in common the most pressing research priorities including stronger study designs such as natural experiments, research that examines inequalities and inequities, establishing the cost effectiveness of interventions, safety and injuries related to engagement in active transportation (AT), and considerations for climate change and climate adaptation. Additional priorities identified by researchers included: implementation science, research that incorporates Indigenous perspectives, land-use policies, built environments that support active aging, and participatory research. Additional priorities identified by knowledge users included: built environments and PA among people living with disabilities and a need for national data on trip chaining, multi-modal travel, and non-work or school-related AT. Conclusions Five common research priorities between the two groups emerged, including (1) to better understand causality, (2) interactions with the natural environment, (3) economic evaluations, (4) social disparities, and (5) preventable AT-related injuries. The findings may help set directions for future research, interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaborations, and funding opportunities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The built environment and active transportation safety in children and youth: a study protocol
    (2019-06-11) Hagel, Brent E; Macpherson, Alison; Howard, Andrew; Fuselli, Pamela; Cloutier, Marie-Soleil; Winters, Meghan; Richmond, Sarah A; Rothman, Linda; Belton, Kathy; Buliung, Ron; Emery, Carolyn A; Faulkner, Guy; Kennedy, Jacqueline; Ma, Tracey; Macarthur, Colin; McCormack, Gavin R.; Morrow, Greg; Nettel-Aguirre, Alberto; Owens, Liz; Pike, Ian; Russell, Kelly; Torres, Juan; Voaklander, Donald; Embree, Tania; Hubka, Tate
    Abstract Background Active transportation, such as walking and biking, is a healthy way for children to explore their environment and develop independence. However, children can be injured while walking and biking. Many cities make changes to the built environment (e.g., traffic calming features, separated bike lanes) to keep people safe. There is some research on how effective these changes are in preventing adult pedestrians and bicyclists from getting hurt, but very little research has been done to show how safe various environments are for children and youth. Our research program will study how features of the built environment affect whether children travel (e.g., to school) using active modes, and whether certain features increase or decrease their likelihood of injury. Methods First, we will use a cross-sectional study design to estimate associations between objectively measured built environment and objectively measured active transportation to school among child elementary students. We will examine the associations between objectively measured built environment and child and youth pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) and bicyclist-MVCs. We will also use these data to determine the space-time distribution of pedestrian-MVCs and bicyclist-MVCs. Second, we will use a case-crossover design to compare the built environment characteristics of the site where child and youth bicyclists sustain emergency department reported injuries and two randomly selected sites (control sites) along the bicyclist’s route before the injury occurred. Third, to identify implementation strategies for built environment change at the municipal level to encourage active transportation we will conduct: 1) an environmental scan, 2) key informant interviews, 3) focus groups, and 4) a national survey to identify facilitators and barriers for implementing built environment change in municipalities. Finally, we will develop a built environment implementation toolkit to promote active transportation and prevent child pedestrian and bicyclist injuries. Discussion This program of research will identify the built environment associated with active transportation safety and form an evidence base from which municipalities can draw information to support change. Our team’s national scope will be invaluable in providing information regarding the variability in built environment characteristics and is vital to producing evidence-based recommendations that will increase safe active transportation.