Browsing by Author "Fraga, Gustavo P"
Now showing 1 - 13 of 13
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemOpen Access2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation(2018-01-24) de’Angelis, Nicola; Di Saverio, Salomone; Chiara, Osvaldo; Sartelli, Massimo; Martínez-Pérez, Aleix; Patrizi, Franca; Weber, Dieter G; Ansaloni, Luca; Biffl, Walter; Ben-Ishay, Offir; Bala, Miklosh; Brunetti, Francesco; Gaiani, Federica; Abdalla, Solafah; Amiot, Aurelien; Bahouth, Hany; Bianchi, Giorgio; Casanova, Daniel; Coccolini, Federico; Coimbra, Raul; de’Angelis, Gian Luigi; De Simone, Belinda; Fraga, Gustavo P; Genova, Pietro; Ivatury, Rao; Kashuk, Jeffry L; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Le Baleur, Yann; Machado, Fernando; Machain, Gustavo M; Maier, Ronald V; Chichom-Mefire, Alain; Memeo, Riccardo; Mesquita, Carlos; Salamea Molina, Juan C; Mutignani, Massimiliano; Manzano-Núñez, Ramiro; Ordoñez, Carlos; Peitzman, Andrew B; Pereira, Bruno M; Picetti, Edoardo; Pisano, Michele; Puyana, Juan C; Rizoli, Sandro; Siddiqui, Mohammed; Sobhani, Iradj; ten Broek, Richard P; Zorcolo, Luigi; Carra, Maria C; Kluger, Yoram; Catena, FaustoAbstract Iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation (ICP) is a severe complication that can occur during both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Although 45–60% of ICPs are diagnosed by the endoscopist while performing the colonoscopy, many ICPs are not immediately recognized but are instead suspected on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms that occur after the endoscopic procedure. There are three main therapeutic options for ICPs: endoscopic repair, conservative therapy, and surgery. The therapeutic approach must vary based on the setting of the diagnosis (intra- or post-colonoscopy), the type of ICP, the characteristics and general status of the patient, the operator’s level of experience, and surgical device availability. Although ICPs have been the focus of numerous publications, no guidelines have been created to standardize the management of ICPs. The aim of this article is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for the management of ICP, which are intended to be used as a tool to promote global standards of care in case of ICP. These guidelines are not meant to substitute providers’ clinical judgment for individual patients, and they may need to be modified based on the medical team’s level of experience and the availability of local resources.
- ItemOpen Access2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting(2020-05-07) Sartelli, Massimo; Weber, Dieter G; Kluger, Yoram; Ansaloni, Luca; Coccolini, Federico; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Augustin, Goran; Ben-Ishay, Offir; Biffl, Walter L; Bouliaris, Konstantinos; Catena, Rodolfo; Ceresoli, Marco; Chiara, Osvaldo; Chiarugi, Massimo; Coimbra, Raul; Cortese, Francesco; Cui, Yunfeng; Damaskos, Dimitris; de’ Angelis, Gian L; Delibegovic, Samir; Demetrashvili, Zaza; De Simone, Belinda; Di Marzo, Francesco; Di Saverio, Salomone; Duane, Therese M; Faro, Mario P; Fraga, Gustavo P; Gkiokas, George; Gomes, Carlos A; Hardcastle, Timothy C; Hecker, Andreas; Karamarkovic, Aleksandar; Kashuk, Jeffry; Khokha, Vladimir; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Kok, Kenneth Y Y; Inaba, Kenji; Isik, Arda; Labricciosa, Francesco M; Latifi, Rifat; Leppäniemi, Ari; Litvin, Andrey; Mazuski, John E; Maier, Ronald V; Marwah, Sanjay; McFarlane, Michael; Moore, Ernest E; Moore, Frederick A; Negoi, Ionut; Pagani, Leonardo; Rasa, Kemal; Rubio-Perez, Ines; Sakakushev, Boris; Sato, Norio; Sganga, Gabriele; Siquini, Walter; Tarasconi, Antonio; Tolonen, Matti; Ulrych, Jan; Zachariah, Sannop K; Catena, FaustoAbstract Acute colonic diverticulitis is one of the most common clinical conditions encountered by surgeons in the acute setting. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis (ALCD) according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of ALCD. The new update has been further integrated with advances in acute right-sided colonic diverticulitis (ARCD) that is more common than ALCD in select regions of the world.
- ItemOpen AccessBologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group(2018-06-19) ten Broek, Richard P G; Krielen, Pepijn; Di Saverio, Salomone; Coccolini, Federico; Biffl, Walter L; Ansaloni, Luca; Velmahos, George C; Sartelli, Massimo; Fraga, Gustavo P; Kelly, Michael D; Moore, Frederick A; Peitzman, Andrew B; Leppaniemi, Ari; Moore, Ernest E; Jeekel, Johannes; Kluger, Yoram; Sugrue, Michael; Balogh, Zsolt J; Bendinelli, Cino; Civil, Ian; Coimbra, Raul; De Moya, Mark; Ferrada, Paula; Inaba, Kenji; Ivatury, Rao; Latifi, Rifat; Kashuk, Jeffry L; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Maier, Ron; Rizoli, Sandro; Sakakushev, Boris; Scalea, Thomas; Søreide, Kjetil; Weber, Dieter; Wani, Imtiaz; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; De’Angelis, Nicola; Piscioneri, Frank; Galante, Joseph M; Catena, Fausto; van Goor, HarryAbstract Background Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency, causing high morbidity and even some mortality. The adhesions causing such bowel obstructions are typically the footprints of previous abdominal surgical procedures. The present paper presents a revised version of the Bologna guidelines to evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of ASBO. The working group has added paragraphs on prevention of ASBO and special patient groups. Methods The guideline was written under the auspices of the World Society of Emergency Surgery by the ASBO working group. A systematic literature search was performed prior to the update of the guidelines to identify relevant new papers on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ASBO. Literature was critically appraised according to an evidence-based guideline development method. Final recommendations were approved by the workgroup, taking into account the level of evidence of the conclusion. Recommendations Adhesion formation might be reduced by minimally invasive surgical techniques and the use of adhesion barriers. Non-operative treatment is effective in most patients with ASBO. Contraindications for non-operative treatment include peritonitis, strangulation, and ischemia. When the adhesive etiology of obstruction is unsure, or when contraindications for non-operative management might be present, CT is the diagnostic technique of choice. The principles of non-operative treatment are nil per os, naso-gastric, or long-tube decompression, and intravenous supplementation with fluids and electrolytes. When operative treatment is required, a laparoscopic approach may be beneficial for selected cases of simple ASBO. Younger patients have a higher lifetime risk for recurrent ASBO and might therefore benefit from application of adhesion barriers as both primary and secondary prevention. Discussion This guideline presents recommendations that can be used by surgeons who treat patients with ASBO. Scientific evidence for some aspects of ASBO management is scarce, in particular aspects relating to special patient groups. Results of a randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for ASBO are awaited.
- ItemOpen AccessClosed Or Open after Source Control Laparotomy for Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis (the COOL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial(2018-06-22) Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Coccolini, Federico; Ansaloni, Luca; Roberts, Derek J; Tolonen, Matti; McKee, Jessica L; Leppaniemi, Ari; Faris, Peter; Doig, Christopher J; Catena, Fausto; Fabian, Timothy; Jenne, Craig N; Chiara, Osvaldo; Kubes, Paul; Manns, Braden; Kluger, Yoram; Fraga, Gustavo P; Pereira, Bruno M; Diaz, Jose J; Sugrue, Michael; Moore, Ernest E; Ren, Jianan; Ball, Chad G; Coimbra, Raul; Balogh, Zsolt J; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Dixon, Elijah; Biffl, Walter; MacLean, Anthony; Ball, Ian; Drover, John; McBeth, Paul B; Posadas-Calleja, Juan G; Parry, Neil G; Di Saverio, Salomone; Ordonez, Carlos A; Xiao, Jimmy; Sartelli, MassimoAbstract Background Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. Principles of treatment include early antibiotic administration and operative source control. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with active negative peritoneal pressure therapy (ANPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and ameliorate the systemic damage from SCIAS. Although there is now a biologic rationale for such an intervention as well as non-standardized and erratic clinical utilization, this remains a novel therapy with potential side effects and clinical equipoise. Methods The Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) study will constitute a prospective randomized controlled trial that will randomly allocate eligible surgical patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or use of the OA with application of an ANPTT dressing. Patients will be eligible if they have free uncontained intra-peritoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR a Predisposition-Infection-Response-Organ Dysfunction Score ≥ 3 or a World-Society-of-Emergency-Surgery-Sepsis-Severity-Score ≥ 8. The primary outcome will be 90-day survival. Secondary outcomes will be logistical, physiologic, safety, bio-mediators, microbiological, quality of life, and health-care costs. Secondary outcomes will include days free of ICU, ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and hospital at 30 days from the index laparotomy. Physiologic secondary outcomes will include changes in intensive care unit illness severity scores after laparotomy. Bio-mediator outcomes for participating centers will involve measurement of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10, procalcitonin, activated protein C (APC), high-mobility group box protein-1, complement factors, and mitochondrial DNA. Economic outcomes will comprise standard costing for utilization of health-care resources. Discussion Although facial closure after SCIAS is considered the current standard of care, many reports are suggesting that OA management may improve outcomes in these patients. This trial will be powered to demonstrate a mortality difference in this highly lethal and morbid condition to ensure critically ill patients are receiving the best care possible and not being harmed by inappropriate therapies based on opinion only. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03163095 .
- ItemOpen AccessCOVID-19 the showdown for mass casualty preparedness and management: the Cassandra Syndrome(2020-04-09) Coccolini, Federico; Sartelli, Massimo; Kluger, Yoram; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Karamagioli, Evika; Moore, Ernest E; Biffl, Walter L; Peitzman, Andrew; Hecker, Andreas; Chirica, Mircea; Damaskos, Dimitrios; Ordonez, Carlos; Vega, Felipe; Fraga, Gustavo P; Chiarugi, Massimo; Di Saverio, Salomone; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Mefire, Alain C; Leppaniemi, Ari; Khokha, Vladimir; Sakakushev, Boris; Catena, Rodolfo; Coimbra, Raul; Ansaloni, Luca; Corbella, Davide; Catena, FaustoAbstract Since December 2019, the world is potentially facing one of the most difficult infectious situations of the last decades. COVID-19 epidemic warrants consideration as a mass casualty incident (MCI) of the highest nature. An optimal MCI/disaster management should consider all four phases of the so-called disaster cycle: mitigation, planning, response, and recovery. COVID-19 outbreak has demonstrated the worldwide unpreparedness to face a global MCI. This present paper thus represents a call for action to solicitate governments and the Global Community to actively start effective plans to promote and improve MCI management preparedness in general, and with an obvious current focus on COVID-19.
- ItemOpen AccessDuodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines(2019-12-11) Coccolini, Federico; Kobayashi, Leslie; Kluger, Yoram; Moore, Ernest E; Ansaloni, Luca; Biffl, Walt; Leppaniemi, Ari; Augustin, Goran; Reva, Viktor; Wani, Imitiaz; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Cicuttin, Enrico; Fraga, Gustavo P; Ordonez, Carlos; Pikoulis, Emmanuil; Sibilla, Maria G; Maier, Ron; Matsumura, Yosuke; Masiakos, Peter T; Khokha, Vladimir; Mefire, Alain C; Ivatury, Rao; Favi, Francesco; Manchev, Vassil; Sartelli, Massimo; Machado, Fernando; Matsumoto, Junichi; Chiarugi, Massimo; Arvieux, Catherine; Catena, Fausto; Coimbra, RaulAbstract Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree injuries are rare in both adult and pediatric trauma patients, and due to their anatomical location, associated injuries are very common. Mortality is primarily related to associated injuries, but morbidity remains high even in isolated injuries. Optimal management of duodeno-bilio-pancreatic injuries is dictated primarily by hemodynamic stability, clinical presentation, and grade of injury. Endoscopic and percutaneous interventions have increased the ability to non-operatively manage these injuries. Late diagnosis and treatment are both associated to increased morbidity and mortality. Sequelae of late presentations of pancreatic injury and complications of severe pancreatic trauma are also increasingly addressed endoscopically and with interventional radiology procedures. However, for moderate and severe extrahepatic biliary and severe duodeno-pancreatic injuries, immediate operative intervention is preferred as associated injuries are frequent and commonly present with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) duodenal, pancreatic, and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma management guidelines.
- ItemOpen AccessGetting the invite list right: a discussion of sepsis severity scoring systems in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis and randomized trial inclusion criteria(2018-04-06) Tolonen, Matti; Coccolini, Federico; Ansaloni, Luca; Sartelli, Massimo; Roberts, Derek J; McKee, Jessica L; Leppaniemi, Ari; Doig, Christopher J; Catena, Fausto; Fabian, Timothy; Jenne, Craig N; Chiara, Osvaldo; Kubes, Paul; Kluger, Yoram; Fraga, Gustavo P; Pereira, Bruno M; Diaz, Jose J; Sugrue, Michael; Moore, Ernest E; Ren, Jianan; Ball, Chad G; Coimbra, Raul; Dixon, Elijah; Biffl, Walter; MacLean, Anthony; McBeth, Paul B; Posadas-Calleja, Juan G; Di Saverio, Salomone; Xiao, Jimmy; Kirkpatrick, Andrew WAbstract Background Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) is a worldwide challenge with increasing incidence. Open abdomen management with enhanced clearance of fluid and biomediators from the peritoneum is a potential therapy requiring prospective evaluation. Given the complexity of powering multi-center trials, it is essential to recruit an inception cohort sick enough to benefit from the intervention; otherwise, no effect of a potentially beneficial therapy may be apparent. An evaluation of abilities of recognized predictive systems to recognize SCIAS patients was conducted using an existing intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) database. Methods All consecutive adult patients with a diffuse secondary peritonitis between 2012 and 2013 were collected from a quaternary care hospital in Finland, excluding appendicitis/cholecystitis. From this retrospectively collected database, a target population (93) of those with either ICU admission or mortality were selected. The performance metrics of the Third Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock based on both SOFA and quick SOFA, the World Society of Emergency Surgery Sepsis Severity Score (WSESSSS), the APACHE II score, Manheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), and the Calgary Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction (CPIRO) score were all tested for their discriminant ability to identify this subgroup with SCIAS and to predict mortality. Results Predictive systems with an area under-the-receiving-operating characteristic (AUC) curve > 0.8 included SOFA, Sepsis-3 definitions, APACHE II, WSESSSS, and CPIRO scores with the overall best for CPIRO. The highest identification rates were SOFA score ≥ 2 (78.4%), followed by the WSESSSS score ≥ 8 (73.1%), SOFA ≥ 3 (75.2%), and APACHE II ≥ 14 (68.8%) identification. Combining the Sepsis-3 septic-shock definition and WSESSS ≥ 8 increased detection to 80%. Including CPIRO score ≥ 3 increased this to 82.8% (Sensitivity-SN; 83% Specificity-SP; 74%. Comparatively, SOFA ≥ 4 and WSESSSS ≥ 8 with or without septic-shock had 83.9% detection (SN; 84%, SP; 75%, 25% mortality). Conclusions No one scoring system behaves perfectly, and all are largely dominated by organ dysfunction. Utilizing combinations of SOFA, CPIRO, and WSESSSS scores in addition to the Sepsis-3 septic shock definition appears to offer the widest “inclusion-criteria” to recognize patients with a high chance of mortality and ICU admission. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ; Registered on May 22, 2017.
- ItemOpen AccessKidney and uro-trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines(2019-12-02) Coccolini, Federico; Moore, Ernest E; Kluger, Yoram; Biffl, Walter; Leppaniemi, Ari; Matsumura, Yosuke; Kim, Fernando; Peitzman, Andrew B; Fraga, Gustavo P; Sartelli, Massimo; Ansaloni, Luca; Augustin, Goran; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Wani, Imitiaz; Weber, Dieter; Pikoulis, Emmanouil; Larrea, Martha; Arvieux, Catherine; Manchev, Vassil; Reva, Viktor; Coimbra, Raul; Khokha, Vladimir; Mefire, Alain C; Ordonez, Carlos; Chiarugi, Massimo; Machado, Fernando; Sakakushev, Boris; Matsumoto, Junichi; Maier, Ron; di Carlo, Isidoro; Catena, FaustoAbstract Renal and urogenital injuries occur in approximately 10-20% of abdominal trauma in adults and children. Optimal management should take into consideration the anatomic injury, the hemodynamic status, and the associated injuries. The management of urogenital trauma aims to restore homeostasis and normal physiology especially in pediatric patients where non-operative management is considered the gold standard. As with all traumatic conditions, the management of urogenital trauma should be multidisciplinary including urologists, interventional radiologists, and trauma surgeons, as well as emergency and ICU physicians. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) kidney and urogenital trauma management guidelines.
- ItemOpen AccessManagement of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference(2017-05-04) Sartelli, Massimo; Catena, Fausto; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Ansaloni, Luca; Biffl, Walter L; Boermeester, Marja A; Ceresoli, Marco; Chiara, Osvaldo; Coccolini, Federico; De Waele, Jan J; Di Saverio, Salomone; Eckmann, Christian; Fraga, Gustavo P; Giannella, Maddalena; Girardis, Massimo; Griffiths, Ewen A; Kashuk, Jeffry; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Khokha, Vladimir; Kluger, Yoram; Labricciosa, Francesco M; Leppaniemi, Ari; Maier, Ronald V; May, Addison K; Malangoni, Mark; Martin-Loeches, Ignacio; Mazuski, John; Montravers, Philippe; Peitzman, Andrew; Pereira, Bruno M; Reis, Tarcisio; Sakakushev, Boris; Sganga, Gabriele; Soreide, Kjetil; Sugrue, Michael; Ulrych, Jan; Vincent, Jean-Louis; Viale, Pierluigi; Moore, Ernest EAbstract This paper reports on the consensus conference on the management of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) which was held on July 23, 2016, in Dublin, Ireland, as a part of the annual World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) meeting. This document covers all aspects of the management of IAIs. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendation is used, and this document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference findings.
- ItemOpen AccessPelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines(2017-01-18) Coccolini, Federico; Stahel, Philip F; Montori, Giulia; Biffl, Walter; Horer, Tal M; Catena, Fausto; Kluger, Yoram; Moore, Ernest E; Peitzman, Andrew B; Ivatury, Rao; Coimbra, Raul; Fraga, Gustavo P; Pereira, Bruno; Rizoli, Sandro; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Leppaniemi, Ari; Manfredi, Roberto; Magnone, Stefano; Chiara, Osvaldo; Solaini, Leonardo; Ceresoli, Marco; Allievi, Niccolò; Arvieux, Catherine; Velmahos, George; Balogh, Zsolt; Naidoo, Noel; Weber, Dieter; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Sartelli, Massimo; Ansaloni, LucaAbstract Complex pelvic injuries are among the most dangerous and deadly trauma related lesions. Different classification systems exist, some are based on the mechanism of injury, some on anatomic patterns and some are focusing on the resulting instability requiring operative fixation. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic impairment of pelvic ring function and the associated injuries. The management of pelvic trauma patients aims definitively to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology associated to the mechanical stability of the pelvic ring. Thus the management of pelvic trauma must be multidisciplinary and should be ultimately based on the physiology of the patient and the anatomy of the injury. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of pelvic trauma and the management Guidelines.
- ItemOpen AccessPhysiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) Study: a WSES observational study(2019-07-15) Sartelli, Massimo; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Labricciosa, Francesco M; Kluger, Yoram; Coccolini, Federico; Ansaloni, Luca; Leppäniemi, Ari; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Tolonen, Matti; Tranà, Cristian; Regimbeau, Jean-Marc; Hardcastle, Timothy; Koshy, Renol M; Abbas, Ashraf; Aday, Ulaş; Adesunkanmi, A. R K; Ajibade, Adesina; Akhmeteli, Lali; Akın, Emrah; Akkapulu, Nezih; Alotaibi, Alhenouf; Altintoprak, Fatih; Anyfantakis, Dimitrios; Atanasov, Boyko; Augustin, Goran; Azevedo, Constança; Bala, Miklosh; Balalis, Dimitrios; Baraket, Oussama; Baral, Suman; Barkai, Or; Beltran, Marcelo; Bini, Roberto; Bouliaris, Konstantinos; Caballero, Ana B; Calu, Valentin; Catani, Marco; Ceresoli, Marco; Charalampakis, Vasileios; Jusoh, Asri C; Chiarugi, Massimo; Cillara, Nicola; Cuesta, Raquel C; Cobuccio, Luigi; Cocorullo, Gianfranco; Colak, Elif; Conti, Luigi; Cui, Yunfeng; De Simone, Belinda; Delibegovic, Samir; Demetrashvili, Zaza; Demetriades, Demetrios; Dimova, Ana; Dogjani, Agron; Enani, Mushira; Farina, Federica; Ferrara, Francesco; Foghetti, Domitilla; Fontana, Tommaso; Fraga, Gustavo P; Gachabayov, Mahir; Gérard, Grelpois; Ghnnam, Wagih; Maurel, Teresa G; Gkiokas, Georgios; Gomes, Carlos A; Guner, Ali; Gupta, Sanjay; Hecker, Andreas; Hirano, Elcio S; Hodonou, Adrien; Hutan, Martin; Ilaschuk, Igor; Ioannidis, Orestis; Isik, Arda; Ivakhov, Georgy; Jain, Sumita; Jokubauskas, Mantas; Karamarkovic, Aleksandar; Kaushik, Robin; Kenig, Jakub; Khokha, Vladimir; Khokha, Denis; Kim, Jae I; Kong, Victor; Korkolis, Dimitris; Kruger, Vitor F; Kshirsagar, Ashok; Simões, Romeo L; Lanaia, Andrea; Lasithiotakis, Konstantinos; Leão, Pedro; Arellano, Miguel L; Listle, Holger; Litvin, Andrey; Lizarazu Pérez, Aintzane; Lopez-Tomassetti Fernandez, Eudaldo; Lostoridis, Eftychios; Luppi, Davide; Machain V, Gustavo M; Major, Piotr; Manatakis, Dimitrios; Reitz, Marianne M; Marinis, Athanasios; Marrelli, Daniele; Martínez-Pérez, Aleix; Marwah, Sanjay; McFarlane, Michael; Mesic, Mirza; Mesina, Cristian; Michalopoulos, Nickos; Misiakos, Evangelos; Moreira, Felipe G; Mouaqit, Ouadii; Muhtaroglu, Ali; Naidoo, Noel; Negoi, Ionut; Nikitina, Zane; Nikolopoulos, Ioannis; Nita, Gabriela-Elisa; Occhionorelli, Savino; Olaoye, Iyiade; Ordoñez, Carlos A; Ozkan, Zeynep; Pal, Ajay; Palini, Gian M; Papageorgiou, Kyriaki; Papagoras, Dimitris; Pata, Francesco; Pędziwiatr, Michał; Pereira, Jorge; Pereira Junior, Gerson A; Perrone, Gennaro; Pintar, Tadeja; Pisarska, Magdalena; Plehutsa, Oleksandr; Podda, Mauro; Poillucci, Gaetano; Quiodettis, Martha; Rahim, Tuba; Rios-Cruz, Daniel; Rodrigues, Gabriel; Rozov, Dmytry; Sakakushev, Boris; Sall, Ibrahima; Sazhin, Alexander; Semião, Miguel; Sharda, Taanya; Shelat, Vishal; Sinibaldi, Giovanni; Skicko, Dmitrijs; Skrovina, Matej; Stamatiou, Dimitrios; Stella, Marco; Strzałka, Marcin; Sydorchuk, Ruslan; Teixeira Gonsaga, Ricardo A; Tochie, Joel N; Tomadze, Gia; Ugoletti, Lara; Ulrych, Jan; Ümarik, Toomas; Uzunoglu, Mustafa Y; Vasilescu, Alin; Vaz, Osborne; Vereczkei, Andras; Vlad, Nutu; Walędziak, Maciej; Yahya, Ali I; Yalkin, Omer; Yilmaz, Tonguç U; Ünal, Ali E; Yuan, Kuo-Ching; Zachariah, Sanoop K; Žilinskas, Justas; Zizzo, Maurizio; Pattonieri, Vittoria; Baiocchi, Gian L; Catena, FaustoAbstract Background Timing and adequacy of peritoneal source control are the most important pillars in the management of patients with acute peritonitis. Therefore, early prognostic evaluation of acute peritonitis is paramount to assess the severity and establish a prompt and appropriate treatment. The objectives of this study were to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute peritonitis and to develop a warning score system, based on easily recognizable and assessable variables, globally accepted. Methods This worldwide multicentre observational study included 153 surgical departments across 56 countries over a 4-month study period between February 1, 2018, and May 31, 2018. Results A total of 3137 patients were included, with 1815 (57.9%) men and 1322 (42.1%) women, with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 28–66). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9%, with a median length of stay of 6 days (IQR 4–10). Using multivariable logistic regression, independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified: age > 80 years, malignancy, severe cardiovascular disease, severe chronic kidney disease, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, AVPU responsiveness scale (voice and unresponsive), blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) < 90% in air, platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3, and lactate > 4 mmol/l. These variables were used to create the PIPAS Severity Score, a bedside early warning score for patients with acute peritonitis. The overall mortality was 2.9% for patients who had scores of 0–1, 22.7% for those who had scores of 2–3, 46.8% for those who had scores of 4–5, and 86.7% for those who have scores of 7–8. Conclusions The simple PIPAS Severity Score can be used on a global level and can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure and mortality.
- ItemOpen AccessSplenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients(2017-08-18) Coccolini, Federico; Montori, Giulia; Catena, Fausto; Kluger, Yoram; Biffl, Walter; Moore, Ernest E; Reva, Viktor; Bing, Camilla; Bala, Miklosh; Fugazzola, Paola; Bahouth, Hany; Marzi, Ingo; Velmahos, George; Ivatury, Rao; Soreide, Kjetil; Horer, Tal; ten Broek, Richard; Pereira, Bruno M; Fraga, Gustavo P; Inaba, Kenji; Kashuk, Joseph; Parry, Neil; Masiakos, Peter T; Mylonas, Konstantinos S; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Abu-Zidan, Fikri; Gomes, Carlos A; Benatti, Simone V; Naidoo, Noel; Salvetti, Francesco; Maccatrozzo, Stefano; Agnoletti, Vanni; Gamberini, Emiliano; Solaini, Leonardo; Costanzo, Antonio; Celotti, Andrea; Tomasoni, Matteo; Khokha, Vladimir; Arvieux, Catherine; Napolitano, Lena; Handolin, Lauri; Pisano, Michele; Magnone, Stefano; Spain, David A; de Moya, Marc; Davis, Kimberly A; De Angelis, Nicola; Leppaniemi, Ari; Ferrada, Paula; Latifi, Rifat; Navarro, David C; Otomo, Yashuiro; Coimbra, Raul; Maier, Ronald V; Moore, Frederick; Rizoli, Sandro; Sakakushev, Boris; Galante, Joseph M; Chiara, Osvaldo; Cimbanassi, Stefania; Mefire, Alain C; Weber, Dieter; Ceresoli, Marco; Peitzman, Andrew B; Wehlie, Liban; Sartelli, Massimo; Di Saverio, Salomone; Ansaloni, LucaAbstract Spleen injuries are among the most frequent trauma-related injuries. At present, they are classified according to the anatomy of the injury. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic derangement, and the associated injuries. The management of splenic trauma patients aims to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology especially considering the modern tools for bleeding management. Thus, the management of splenic trauma should be ultimately multidisciplinary and based on the physiology of the patient, the anatomy of the injury, and the associated lesions. Lastly, as the management of adults and children must be different, children should always be treated in dedicated pediatric trauma centers. In fact, the vast majority of pediatric patients with blunt splenic trauma can be managed non-operatively. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of splenic trauma and the management guidelines.
- ItemOpen AccessThe management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections(2017-07-10) Sartelli, Massimo; Chichom-Mefire, Alain; Labricciosa, Francesco M; Hardcastle, Timothy; Abu-Zidan, Fikri M; Adesunkanmi, Abdulrashid K; Ansaloni, Luca; Bala, Miklosh; Balogh, Zsolt J; Beltrán, Marcelo A; Ben-Ishay, Offir; Biffl, Walter L; Birindelli, Arianna; Cainzos, Miguel A; Catalini, Gianbattista; Ceresoli, Marco; Che Jusoh, Asri; Chiara, Osvaldo; Coccolini, Federico; Coimbra, Raul; Cortese, Francesco; Demetrashvili, Zaza; Di Saverio, Salomone; Diaz, Jose J; Egiev, Valery N; Ferrada, Paula; Fraga, Gustavo P; Ghnnam, Wagih M; Lee, Jae G; Gomes, Carlos A; Hecker, Andreas; Herzog, Torsten; Kim, Jae I; Inaba, Kenji; Isik, Arda; Karamarkovic, Aleksandar; Kashuk, Jeffry; Khokha, Vladimir; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W; Kluger, Yoram; Koike, Kaoru; Kong, Victor Y; Leppaniemi, Ari; Machain, Gustavo M; Maier, Ronald V; Marwah, Sanjay; McFarlane, Michael E; Montori, Giulia; Moore, Ernest E; Negoi, Ionut; Olaoye, Iyiade; Omari, Abdelkarim H; Ordonez, Carlos A; Pereira, Bruno M; Pereira Júnior, Gerson A; Pupelis, Guntars; Reis, Tarcisio; Sakakushev, Boris; Sato, Norio; Segovia Lohse, Helmut A; Shelat, Vishal G; Søreide, Kjetil; Uhl, Waldemar; Ulrych, Jan; Van Goor, Harry; Velmahos, George C; Yuan, Kuo-Ching; Wani, Imtiaz; Weber, Dieter G; Zachariah, Sanoop K; Catena, FaustoAbstract Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and have been reported as major contributors to non-trauma deaths in the emergency departments worldwide. The cornerstones of effective treatment of IAIs are early recognition, adequate source control, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Prompt resuscitation of patients with ongoing sepsis is of utmost important. In hospitals worldwide, non-acceptance of, or lack of access to, accessible evidence-based practices and guidelines result in overall poorer outcome of patients suffering IAIs. The aim of this paper is to promote global standards of care in IAIs and update the 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.