Browsing by Author "Gulbrandsen, Carolyn"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Exploring the Experiences of Social Workers Using Spirituality in Their Practice(2022-04) Ciesielski, Jill; Walsh, Christine; Hewson, Jennifer; Gulbrandsen, Carolyn; Sinclair, ShaneDespite decades of discussion, spirituality remains a neglected area of social work education and practice. This study explored the experiences and perspectives of seven social work practitioners in Alberta who are actively incorporating spirituality into their practice through qualitative interviews. The findings indicated the ways these practitioners are using spirituality in their direct work with clients, the relationship between their own personal spirituality and their work, and the ways in which their specific practice context influences their use of spirituality in practice. Despite a lack of guidance with respect to spirituality in their social work education and training, participants were drawing on their own experiences and resources to inform their use of spirituality in practice. While this highlighted the resourcefulness of the participants, it also raised ethical questions about the implications of this more broadly within the social work profession. Implications for social work education, practice, and policy and recommendations for future research are also outlined.Item Open Access Visible Strengths: Older Women’s Resilience in the Context of Age Related Adversity(2017) Gulbrandsen, Carolyn; Walsh, Christine; Hewson, Jennifer; Lund, Darren; Marlett, Nancy; O'Connor, DeborahThe objective of the qualitative study was to describe older women’s resilience according to women’s interpretations of their experiences and their understandings of resilience and adversity. The study combined constructivist grounded theory methodology and feminist PAR to create new knowledge about older women’s resilience. Both qualitative methodologies contributed to the study in unique, yet equally important ways. Constructivist grounded theory involved the use of systematic data collection and analysis methods to construct a theory about older women’s resilience and FPAR provided a framework of ethical principles and bridged the construction of new knowledge with social justice oriented action. Drawing from researcher reflexivity, this study explains how every aspect of the research process, including the implementation of constructivist grounded theory methods, was guided by FPAR principles. The constructivist grounded theory created from the researcher’s interpretations of participants’ experiences and the recommendations women formulated during the interviews and focus groups informed the action component of this study that is essential in FPAR. Constructivist grounded theory methodology guided the collection and analysis of data from interviews with 25 women ages 55-73 and from two focus groups. Intersectionality and critical feminist gerontology served as theoretical frameworks for examining the diversity of women’s experiences. The researcher interpreted women’s reflections on their experiences and identified a core category and a constellation of distinct yet interrelated categories, sub-categories and themes. The core category that described the experiences of the women in the study and their understanding of resilience was learning and cultivating wisdom in response to change. Study findings represented women’s diverse experiences and interpretations of change. Women in the study described how their resilience was related to distinct types of change, including identity related change, crisis, loss and significant experiences, how their learning has transformed into wisdom over the course of their lives, and how their resilience is bolstered by sources of scaffolding. The implications for practice described in the study are informed by participants’ recommendations and include valuing the significance of the meaning older women ascribe to their experiences and developing programs that provide sources of scaffolding identified by women in the study.