Browsing by Author "Hendrick, Kathryn"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    National Preclinical Sepsis Platform: developing a framework for accelerating innovation in Canadian sepsis research
    (2021-03-19) Mendelson, Asher A; Lansdell, Casey; Fox-Robichaud, Alison E; Liaw, Patricia; Arora, Jaskirat; Cailhier, Jean-François; Cepinskas, Gediminas; Charbonney, Emmanuel; dos Santos, Claudia; Dwivedi, Dhruva; Ellis, Christopher G; Fergusson, Dean; Fiest, Kirsten; Gill, Sean E; Hendrick, Kathryn; Hunniford, Victoria T; Kowalewska, Paulina M; Krewulak, Karla; Lehmann, Christian; Macala, Kimberly; Marshall, John C; Mawdsley, Laura; McDonald, Braedon; McDonald, Ellen; Medeiros, Sarah K; Muniz, Valdirene S; Osuchowski, Marcin; Presseau, Justin; Sharma, Neha; Sohrabipour, Sahar; Sunohara-Neilson, Janet; Vázquez-Grande, Gloria; Veldhuizen, Ruud A W; Welsh, Donald; Winston, Brent W; Zarychanski, Ryan; Zhang, Haibo; Zhou, Juan; Lalu, Manoj M
    Abstract Despite decades of preclinical research, no experimentally derived therapies for sepsis have been successfully adopted into routine clinical practice. Factors that contribute to this crisis of translation include poor representation by preclinical models of the complex human condition of sepsis, bias in preclinical studies, as well as limitations of single-laboratory methodology. To overcome some of these shortcomings, multicentre preclinical studies—defined as a research experiment conducted in two or more research laboratories with a common protocol and analysis—are expected to maximize transparency, improve reproducibility, and enhance generalizability. The ultimate objective is to increase the efficiency and efficacy of bench-to-bedside translation for preclinical sepsis research and improve outcomes for patients with life-threatening infection. To this end, we organized the first meeting of the National Preclinical Sepsis Platform (NPSP). This multicentre preclinical  research collaboration of Canadian sepsis researchers and stakeholders was established to study the pathophysiology of sepsis and accelerate movement of promising therapeutics into early phase clinical trials. Integrated knowledge translation and shared decision-making were emphasized to ensure the goals of the platform align with clinical researchers and patient partners. 29 participants from 10 independent labs attended and discussed four main topics: (1) objectives of the platform; (2) animal models of sepsis; (3) multicentre methodology and (4) outcomes for evaluation. A PIRO model (predisposition, insult, response, organ dysfunction) for experimental design was proposed to strengthen linkages with interdisciplinary researchers and key stakeholders. This platform represents an important resource for maximizing translational impact of preclinical sepsis research.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Protocol for co-producing a framework and integrated resource platform for engaging patients in laboratory-based research
    (2024-02-12) Lalu, Manoj M.; Richards, Dawn; Foster, Madison; French, Brittany; Crawley, Angela M.; Fiest, Kirsten M.; Hendrick, Kathryn; Macala, Kimberly F.; Mendelson, Asher A.; Messner, Pat; Nicholls, Stuart G.; Presseau, Justin; Séguin, Cheryle A.; Sullivan, Patrick; Thébaud, Bernard; Fergusson, Dean A.
    Abstract Background Patient engagement in research is the meaningful and collaborative interaction between patients and researchers throughout the research process. Patient engagement can help to ensure patient-oriented values and perspectives are incorporated into the development, conduct, and dissemination of research. While patient engagement is increasingly prevalent in clinical research, it remains relatively unrealized in preclinical laboratory research. This may reflect the nature of preclinical research, in which routine interactions or engagement with patients may be less common. Our team of patient partners and researchers has previously identified few published examples of patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research, as well as a paucity of guidance on this topic. Here we propose the development of a process framework to facilitate patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research. Methods Our team, inclusive of researchers and patient partners, will develop a comprehensive, empirically-derived, and stakeholder-informed process framework for ‘patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research.’ First, our team will create a ‘deliberative knowledge space’ to conduct semi-structured discussions that will inform a draft framework for preclinical patient engagement. Over the course of several sessions, we will identify actions, activities, barriers, and enablers (e.g. considerations and motivations for patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research, define roles of key players). The resulting draft process framework will be further populated with examples and refined through an international consensus-building Delphi survey with patients, researchers, and other collaborator organizations. We will then conduct pilot field tests to evaluate the framework with preclinical laboratory research groups paired with patient partners. These results will be used to create a refined framework enriched with real-world examples and considerations. All resources developed will be made available through an online repository. Discussion Our proposed process framework will provide guidance, best practices, and standardized procedures to promote patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research. Supporting and facilitating patient engagement in this setting presents an exciting new opportunity to help realize the important impact that patients can make.