Browsing by Author "Metz, Martina L."
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Cultivating the Growth of Mathematical Images(2019-07-05) Plosz, Jennifer A.; Towers, Jo; Francis, Krista; Metz, Martina L.In this document, I present some of the findings of the study, Cultivating the Growth of Mathematical Images, in which I explore the role that spatial reasoning plays in the growth of mathematical images. This study involved Grade Five students labelled with learning disabilities and their teacher. This study was a microanalysis of a participatory action research study, as it looked at the beginning stages of exploration with students and the impact that a more spatial approach to fractions might have on their growth. Information was gathered from students’ psychoeducational assessment, an informal assessment of spatial reasoning ability, and a pre-assessment task that looked at their understanding of basic number and fractions. There were many layers of complexity surrounding each student’s psychoeducational profile, their performance in the classroom, and the pre-assessment task offered to the students. Certain aspects of these experiences seemed consistent with each other, others contradictory, and still others contained much variability, such as in the area of working memory. During the second week of the study, video data were collected while students engaged with a task that created an interplay between visualizing and building fractions. In analysis of the data, close attention was paid to what sort of offerings the students were given such as signitive (written and oral), imaginative (visualizing), and perceptual (sensory), which are somewhat modified from Husserl (1970). During this task, a pattern of growth began to emerge which is discussed and connected to the Pirie-Kieren (1994) Dynamical Theory for the Growth of Mathematical Understanding. Generally, with the introduction of the signitive only, there was No appearance of movement. Then as the student began either producing or receiving perceptual experiences they progressed into the Image Making phase. The continued engagement with perceptual experiences appeared to create the beginnings of the imaginative, Image Making emergent Image Having phase, and some students were even able to reach the point of being predominately in the Image Having phase. Each participant went through the various phases at varying speeds. Within these various phases, there was found to be much complexity in terms of contributing factors towards growth. The fact that some participants built more than others and therefore had more perceptual offerings seemed a strong contributing factor but other aspects such as their own personal commitment to sense-making as they built, their social interactions, and their own self-belief seemed to also impact growth.