Browsing by Author "Smith, Maureen"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Correction to: Establishing a core outcome set for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) in children: study protocol for a rapid literature review, candidate outcomes survey, and Delphi surveys
    (2021-12-09) Howie, Alison H.; Tingley, Kylie; Inbar-Feigenberg, Michal; Mitchell, John J.; Butcher, Nancy J.; Offringa, Martin; Smith, Maureen; Angel, Kim; Gentle, Jenifer; Wyatt, Alexandra; Campeau, Philippe M.; Chan, Alicia; Chakraborty, Pranesh; El Turk, Farah; Mamak, Eva; Mhanni, Aizeddin; Skidmore, Becky; Sparkes, Rebecca; Stockler, Sylvia; Potter, Beth K.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Establishing a core outcome set for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) in children: study protocol for a rapid literature review, candidate outcomes survey, and Delphi surveys
    (2021-11-17) Howie, Alison H.; Tingley, Kylie; Inbar-Feigenberg, Michal; Mitchell, John J.; Butcher, Nancy J.; Offringa, Martin; Smith, Maureen; Angel, Kim; Gentle, Jenifer; Wyatt, Alexandra; Campeau, Philippe M.; Chan, Alicia; Chakraborty, Pranesh; El Turk, Farah; Mamak, Eva; Mhanni, Aizeddin; Skidmore, Becky; Sparkes, Rebecca; Stockler, Sylvia; Potter, Beth K.
    Abstract Background Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of inherited metabolic diseases characterized by chronic, progressive multi-system manifestations with varying degrees of severity. Disease-modifying therapies exist to treat some types of MPS; however, they are not curative, underscoring the need to identify and evaluate co-interventions that optimize functioning, participation in preferred activities, and quality of life. A Canadian pediatric MPS registry is under development and may serve as a platform to launch randomized controlled trials to evaluate such interventions. To promote the standardized collection of patient/family-reported and clinical outcomes considered important to patients/families, health care providers (HCPs), and policymakers, the choice of outcomes to include in the registry will be informed by a core outcome set (COS). We aim to establish a patient-oriented COS for pediatric MPS using a multi-stakeholder approach. Methods In step 1 of the six-step process to develop the COS, we will identify relevant outcomes through a rapid literature review and candidate outcomes survey. A two-phase screening approach will be implemented to identify eligible publications, followed by extraction of outcomes and other pre-specified data elements. Simultaneously, we will conduct a candidate outcomes survey with children with MPS and their families to identify outcomes most important to them. In step 2, HCPs experienced in treating patients with MPS will be invited to review the list of outcomes generated in step 1 and identify additional clinically relevant outcomes. We will then ask patients/families, HCPs, and policymakers to rate the outcomes in a set of Delphi Surveys (step 3), and to participate in a subsequent consensus meeting to finalize the COS (step 4). Step 5 involves establishing a set of outcome measurement instruments for the COS. Finally, we will disseminate the COS to knowledge users (step 6). Discussion The proposed COS will inform the choice of outcomes to include in the MPS registry and, more broadly, promote the standardized collection of patient-oriented outcomes for pediatric MPS research. By involving patients/families from the earliest stage of the research, we will ensure that the COS will be relevant to those who will ultimately benefit from the research. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42021267531 , COMET
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Establishing core outcome sets for phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency in children: study protocol for systematic reviews and Delphi surveys
    (2017-12-19) Potter, Beth K; Hutton, Brian; Clifford, Tammy J; Pallone, Nicole; Smith, Maureen; Stockler, Sylvia; Chakraborty, Pranesh; Barbeau, Pauline; Garritty, Chantelle M; Pugliese, Michael; Rahman, Alvi; Skidmore, Becky; Tessier, Laure; Tingley, Kylie; Coyle, Doug; Greenberg, Cheryl R; Korngut, Lawrence; MacKenzie, Alex; Mitchell, John J; Nicholls, Stuart; Offringa, Martin; Schulze, Andreas; Taljaard, Monica
    Abstract Background Inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) are a large group of rare single-gene disorders that are typically diagnosed early in life. There are important evidence gaps related to the comparative effectiveness of therapies for IMD, which are in part due to challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for rare diseases. Registry-based RCTs present a unique opportunity to address these challenges provided the registries implement standardized collection of outcomes that are important to patients and their caregivers and to clinical providers and healthcare systems. Currently there is no core outcome set (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for paediatric IMD. This protocol outlines a study that will establish COS for each of two relatively common IMD in children, phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency. Methods This two-part study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. Part 1 includes a rapid review and development of an evidence map to identify a comprehensive listing of outcomes reported in past studies of PKU and MCAD deficiency. The review follows established methods for knowledge synthesis, including a comprehensive search strategy, two stages of screening citations against inclusion/exclusion criteria by two reviewers working independently, and extraction of important data elements from eligible studies, including details of the outcomes collected and outcome measurement instruments. The review findings will inform part 2 of our study, a set of Delphi surveys to establish consensus on the highest priority outcomes for each condition. Healthcare providers, families of children with PKU or MCAD deficiency, and health system decision-makers will be invited to participate in two to three rounds of Delphi surveys. The design of the surveys will involve parents of children with IMD who are part of a family advisory forum. Discussion This protocol is a crucial step in developing the capacity to launch RCTs with meaningful outcomes that address comparative effectiveness questions in the field of paediatric IMD. Such trials will contribute high-quality evidence to inform decision-making by patients and their family members, clinicians, and policy-makers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Outcomes in pediatric studies of medium-chain acyl-coA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and phenylketonuria (PKU): a review
    (2020-01-14) Pugliese, Michael; Tingley, Kylie; Chow, Andrea; Pallone, Nicole; Smith, Maureen; Rahman, Alvi; Chakraborty, Pranesh; Geraghty, Michael T; Irwin, Julie; Tessier, Laure; Nicholls, Stuart G; Offringa, Martin; Butcher, Nancy J; Iverson, Ryan; Clifford, Tammy J; Stockler, Sylvia; Hutton, Brian; Paik, Karen; Tao, Jessica; Skidmore, Becky; Coyle, Doug; Duddy, Kathleen; Dyack, Sarah; Greenberg, Cheryl R; Ghai, Shailly J; Karp, Natalya; Korngut, Lawrence; Kronick, Jonathan; MacKenzie, Alex; MacKenzie, Jennifer; Maranda, Bruno; Mitchell, John J; Potter, Murray; Prasad, Chitra; Schulze, Andreas; Sparkes, Rebecca; Taljaard, Monica; Trakadis, Yannis; Walia, Jagdeep; Potter, Beth K
    Abstract Background Inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) are a group of individually rare single-gene diseases. For many IMDs, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence that evaluates the effectiveness of clinical interventions. Clinical effectiveness trials of IMD interventions could be supported through the development of core outcome sets (COSs), a recommended minimum set of standardized, high-quality outcomes and associated outcome measurement instruments to be incorporated by all trials in an area of study. We began the process of establishing pediatric COSs for two IMDs, medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and phenylketonuria (PKU), by reviewing published literature to describe outcomes reported by authors, identify heterogeneity in outcomes across studies, and assemble a candidate list of outcomes. Methods We used a comprehensive search strategy to identify primary studies and guidelines relevant to children with MCAD deficiency and PKU, extracting study characteristics and outcome information from eligible studies including outcome measurement instruments for select outcomes. Informed by an established framework and a previously published pediatric COS, outcomes were grouped into five, mutually-exclusive, a priori core areas: growth and development, life impact, pathophysiological manifestations, resource use, and death. Results For MCAD deficiency, we identified 83 outcomes from 52 articles. The most frequently represented core area was pathophysiological manifestations, with 33 outcomes reported in 29/52 articles (56%). Death was the most frequently reported outcome. One-third of outcomes were reported by a single study. The most diversely measured outcome was cognition and intelligence/IQ for which eight unique measurement instruments were reported among 14 articles. For PKU, we identified 97 outcomes from 343 articles. The most frequently represented core area was pathophysiological manifestations with 31 outcomes reported in 281/343 articles (82%). Phenylalanine concentration was the most frequently reported outcome. Sixteen percent of outcomes were reported by a single study. Similar to MCAD deficiency, the most diversely measured PKU outcome was cognition and intelligence/IQ with 39 different instruments reported among 82 articles. Conclusions Heterogeneity of reported outcomes and outcome measurement instruments across published studies for both MCAD deficiency and PKU highlights the need for COSs for these diseases, to promote the use of meaningful outcomes and facilitate comparisons across studies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation
    (2020-02-01) Petkovic, Jennifer; Riddle, Alison; Akl, Elie A; Khabsa, Joanne; Lytvyn, Lyubov; Atwere, Pearl; Campbell, Pauline; Chalkidou, Kalipso; Chang, Stephanie M; Crowe, Sally; Dans, Leonila; Jardali, Fadi E; Ghersi, Davina; Graham, Ian D; Grant, Sean; Greer-Smith, Regina; Guise, Jeanne-Marie; Hazlewood, Glen; Jull, Janet; Katikireddi, S. V; Langlois, Etienne V; Lyddiatt, Anne; Maxwell, Lara; Morley, Richard; Mustafa, Reem A; Nonino, Francesco; Pardo, Jordi P; Pollock, Alex; Pottie, Kevin; Riva, John; Schünemann, Holger; Simeon, Rosiane; Smith, Maureen; Stein, Airton T; Synnot, Anneliese; Tufte, Janice; White, Howard; Welch, Vivian; Concannon, Thomas W; Tugwell, Peter
    Abstract Background Stakeholder engagement has become widely accepted as a necessary component of guideline development and implementation. While frameworks for developing guidelines express the need for those potentially affected by guideline recommendations to be involved in their development, there is a lack of consensus on how this should be done in practice. Further, there is a lack of guidance on how to equitably and meaningfully engage multiple stakeholders. We aim to develop guidance for the meaningful and equitable engagement of multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation. Methods This will be a multi-stage project. The first stage is to conduct a series of four systematic reviews. These will (1) describe existing guidance and methods for stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (2) characterize barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (3) explore the impact of stakeholder engagement on guideline development and implementation, and (4) identify issues related to conflicts of interest when engaging multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation. Discussion We will collaborate with our multiple and diverse stakeholders to develop guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation. We will use the results of the systematic reviews to develop a candidate list of draft guidance recommendations and will seek broad feedback on the draft guidance via an online survey of guideline developers and external stakeholders. An invited group of representatives from all stakeholder groups will discuss the results of the survey at a consensus meeting which will inform the development of the final guidance papers. Our overall goal is to improve the development of guidelines through meaningful and equitable multi-stakeholder engagement, and subsequently to improve health outcomes and reduce inequities in health.