Browsing by Author "Wilson, Brenda J"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Evaluation of the quality of clinical data collection for a pan-Canadian cohort of children affected by inherited metabolic diseases: lessons learned from the Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network
    (2020-04-10) Tingley, Kylie; Lamoureux, Monica; Pugliese, Michael; Geraghty, Michael T; Kronick, Jonathan B; Potter, Beth K; Coyle, Doug; Wilson, Kumanan; Kowalski, Michael; Austin, Valerie; Brunel-Guitton, Catherine; Buhas, Daniela; Chan, Alicia K J; Dyack, Sarah; Feigenbaum, Annette; Giezen, Alette; Goobie, Sharan; Greenberg, Cheryl R; Ghai, Shailly J; Inbar-Feigenberg, Michal; Karp, Natalya; Kozenko, Mariya; Langley, Erica; Lines, Matthew; Little, Julian; MacKenzie, Jennifer; Maranda, Bruno; Mercimek-Andrews, Saadet; Mohan, Connie; Mhanni, Aizeddin; Mitchell, Grant; Mitchell, John J; Nagy, Laura; Napier, Melanie; Pender, Amy; Potter, Murray; Prasad, Chitra; Ratko, Suzanne; Salvarinova, Ramona; Schulze, Andreas; Siriwardena, Komudi; Sondheimer, Neal; Sparkes, Rebecca; Stockler-Ipsiroglu, Sylvia; Trakadis, Yannis; Turner, Lesley; Van Karnebeek, Clara; Vallance, Hilary; Vandersteen, Anthony; Walia, Jagdeep; Wilson, Ashley; Wilson, Brenda J; Yu, Andrea C; Yuskiv, Nataliya; Chakraborty, Pranesh
    Abstract Background The Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network (CIMDRN) is a pan-Canadian practice-based research network of 14 Hereditary Metabolic Disease Treatment Centres and over 50 investigators. CIMDRN aims to develop evidence to improve health outcomes for children with inherited metabolic diseases (IMD). We describe the development of our clinical data collection platform, discuss our data quality management plan, and present the findings to date from our data quality assessment, highlighting key lessons that can serve as a resource for future clinical research initiatives relating to rare diseases. Methods At participating centres, children born from 2006 to 2015 who were diagnosed with one of 31 targeted IMD were eligible to participate in CIMDRN’s clinical research stream. For all participants, we collected a minimum data set that includes information about demographics and diagnosis. For children with five prioritized IMD, we collected longitudinal data including interventions, clinical outcomes, and indicators of disease management. The data quality management plan included: design of user-friendly and intuitive clinical data collection forms; validation measures at point of data entry, designed to minimize data entry errors; regular communications with each CIMDRN site; and routine review of aggregate data. Results As of June 2019, CIMDRN has enrolled 798 participants of whom 764 (96%) have complete minimum data set information. Results from our data quality assessment revealed that potential data quality issues were related to interpretation of definitions of some variables, participants who transferred care across institutions, and the organization of information within the patient charts (e.g., neuropsychological test results). Little information was missing regarding disease ascertainment and diagnosis (e.g., ascertainment method – 0% missing). Discussion Using several data quality management strategies, we have established a comprehensive clinical database that provides information about care and outcomes for Canadian children affected by IMD. We describe quality issues and lessons for consideration in future clinical research initiatives for rare diseases, including accurately accommodating different clinic workflows and balancing comprehensiveness of data collection with available resources. Integrating data collection within clinical care, leveraging electronic medical records, and implementing core outcome sets will be essential for achieving sustainability.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Fall prevention interventions for older community-dwelling adults: systematic reviews on benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences
    (2021-01-09) Pillay, Jennifer; Riva, John J; Tessier, Laure A; Colquhoun, Heather; Lang, Eddy; Moore, Ainsley E; Thombs, Brett D; Wilson, Brenda J; Tzenov, Amanda; Donnelly, Catherine; Émond, Marcel; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna; Milligan, Jamie; Keto-Lambert, Diana; Rahman, Sholeh; Vandermeer, Ben; Tricco, Andrea C; Straus, Sharon E; Thomas, Sonia M; Mitchelmore, Bradley R; Rolland-Harris, Elizabeth; Hartling, Lisa
    Abstract Background An estimated 20–30% of community-dwelling Canadian adults aged 65 years or older experience one or more falls each year. Fall-related injuries are a leading cause of hospitalization and can lead to functional independence. Many fall prevention interventions, often based on modifiable risk factors, have been studied. Apart from the magnitude of the benefits and harms from different interventions, the preferences of older adults for different interventions as well as the relative importance they place on the different potential outcomes may influence recommendations by guideline panels. These reviews on benefits and harms of interventions, and on patient values and preferences, will inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care to develop recommendations on fall prevention for primary care providers. Methods To review the benefits and harms of fall prevention interventions, we will update a previous systematic review of randomized controlled trials with adaptations to modify the classification of interventions and narrow the scope to community-dwelling older adults and primary-care relevant interventions. Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ageline), reference lists, trial registries, and relevant websites will be searched, using limits for randomized trials and date (2016 onwards). We will classify interventions according to the Prevention of Falls Network Europe (ProFANE) Group’s taxonomy. Outcomes include fallers, falls, injurious falls, fractures, hip fractures, institutionalization, health-related quality of life, functional status, and intervention-related adverse effects. For studies not included in the previous review, screening, study selection, data extraction on outcomes, and risk of bias assessments will be independently undertaken by two reviewers with consensus used for final decisions. Where quantitative analysis is suitable, network or pairwise meta-analysis will be conducted using a frequentist approach in Stata. Assessment of the transitivity and coherence of the network meta-analyses will be undertaken. For the reviews on patient preferences and outcome valuation (relative importance of outcomes), we will perform de novo reviews with searches in three databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL) and reference lists for cross-sectional, longitudinal quantitative, or qualitative studies published from 2000. Selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments suitable for each study design will be performed in duplicate. The analysis will be guided by a narrative synthesis approach, which may include meta-analysis for health-state utilities. We will use the CINeMa approach to a rate the certainty of the evidence for outcomes on intervention effects analyzed using network meta-analysis and the GRADE approach for all other outcomes. Discussion We will describe the flow of literature and characteristics of all studies and present results of all analyses and summary of finding tables. We will compare our findings to others and discuss the limitations of the reviews and the available literature. Systematic review registration This protocol has not been registered.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Health services use among children diagnosed with medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency through newborn screening: a cohort study in Ontario, Canada
    (2019-03-22) Karaceper, Maria D; Khangura, Sara D; Wilson, Kumanan; Coyle, Doug; Brownell, Marni; Davies, Christine; Dodds, Linda; Feigenbaum, Annette; Fell, Deshayne B; Grosse, Scott D; Guttmann, Astrid; Hawken, Steven; Hayeems, Robin Z; Kronick, Jonathan B; Laberge, Anne-Marie; Little, Julian; Mhanni, Aizeddin; Mitchell, John J; Nakhla, Meranda; Potter, Murray; Prasad, Chitra; Rockman-Greenberg, Cheryl; Sparkes, Rebecca; Stockler, Sylvia; Ueda, Keiko; Vallance, Hilary; Wilson, Brenda J; Chakraborty, Pranesh; Potter, Beth K
    Abstract Background We describe early health services utilization for children diagnosed with medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency through newborn screening in Ontario, Canada, relative to a screen negative comparison cohort. Methods Eligible children were identified via newborn screening between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2010. Age-stratified rates of physician encounters, emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient hospitalizations to March 31, 2012 were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRR) and incidence rate differences (IRD). We used negative binomial regression to adjust IRRs for sex, gestational age, birth weight, socioeconomic status and rural/urban residence. Results Throughout the first few years of life, children with MCAD deficiency (n = 40) experienced statistically significantly higher rates of physician encounters, ED visits, and hospital stays compared with the screen negative cohort. The highest rates of ED visits and hospitalizations in the MCAD deficiency cohort occurred from 6 months to 2 years of age (ED use: 2.1–2.5 visits per child per year; hospitalization: 0.5–0.6 visits per child per year), after which rates gradually declined. Conclusions This study confirms that young children with MCAD deficiency use health services more frequently than the general population throughout the first few years of life. Rates of service use in this population gradually diminish after 24 months of age.