Browsing by Author "Wulffraat, Nico M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Factors associated with care- and health-related quality of life of caregivers of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    (2022-07-23) Grazziotin, Luiza R.; Currie, Gillian; Twilt, Marinka; IJzerman, Maarten J.; Kip, Michelle M. A.; Koffijberg, Hendrik; Bonsel, Gouke; Benseler, Susanne M.; Swart, Joost F.; Vastert, Sebastiaan J.; Wulffraat, Nico M.; Yeung, Rae S. M.; Armbrust, Wineke; van den Berg, J. M.; Marshall, Deborah A.
    Abstract Objective This study investigates the relationship of child, caregiver, and caring context measurements with the care-related quality of life (CRQoL) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of caregivers of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data on caregivers of children with JIA from Canada and the Netherlands collected for the “Canada-Netherlands Personalized Medicine Network in Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases” study from June 2019 to September 2021. We used the CRQoL questionnaire (CarerQoL), adult EQ-5D-5L, and proxy-reported Youth 5-Level version of EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L-Y) to assess caregiver CRQoL, caregiver HRQoL, and child HRQoL, respectively. We used a multivariate analysis to assess the relationship between both caregiver CRQoL and HRQoL and patient, caregiver, and caring context measurements. Results A total of 250 caregivers were included in this study. Most of the caregivers were from the Netherlands (n = 178, 71%) and 77% were females (n = 193). The mean CarerQoL scores was 82.7 (standard deviation (SD) 11.4) and the mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was 0.87 (SD 0.16). Child HRQoL and employment had a positive relationship with both caregiver CarerQoL and EQ-5D-5L utility scores (p < 0.05), while receiving paid or unpaid help had a negative relationship with both scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our findings indicated that to understand the impact of JIA on families, we need to consider socio-economic factors, such as employment and support to carry caregiving tasks, in addition to child HRQoL.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Real-world data reveals the complexity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment patterns in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an observational study
    (2022-04-11) Grazziotin, Luiza R.; Currie, Gillian; Twilt, Marinka; Ijzerman, Maarten J.; Kip, Michelle M. A.; Koffijberg, Hendrik; Benseler, Susanne M.; Swart, Joost F.; Vastert, Sebastiaan J.; Wulffraat, Nico M.; Yeung, Rae S. M.; Marshall, Deborah A.
    Abstract Objective Pharmacological treatment is a cornerstone of care for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The objective of this study is to evaluate prescription patterns of conventional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs) for patients with JIA. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children diagnosed with JIA at a rheumatology pediatric clinic. Eligibility criteria were defined as children and youth newly diagnosed with enthesis-related arthritis, polyarticular, or oligoarticular JIA between 2011 and 2019, with at least one year of observation. Data on c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs prescriptions were obtained from electronic medical charts. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan–Meier survival methods, and Sankey diagrams to describe treatment prescription patterns. Results A total of 325 patients with JIA were included, with a median observation time of 3.7 years. The most frequently prescribed c-DMARD and b-DMARD were methotrexate and etanercept, respectively. Within the first year of rheumatology care, 62% and 21% of patients had a c-DMARD and a b-DMARD prescribed, respectively. These proportions varied greatly by JIA subtype. Among the 147 (147/325, 45%) patients that had at least one b-DMARD prescribed, 24% were prescribed a second, and 7% a third-line of b-DMARD. A total of 112 unique treatment sequences were observed, with c-DMARD monotherapy followed by the addition of either a b-DMARD (56%) or another c-DMARD (30%) being the two most prevalent patterns in this cohort. Conclusion We observed a variety of treatment trajectories, with many patients experiencing multiple treatment lines, illustrating the complexity of the overall JIA treatment path.