Browsing by Author "Zhang, Han"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemOpen AccessTreatment de-escalation for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with radiotherapy vs. trans-oral surgery (ORATOR2): study protocol for a randomized phase II trial(2020-02-14) Nichols, Anthony C; Lang, Pencilla; Prisman, Eitan; Berthelet, Eric; Tran, Eric; Hamilton, Sarah; Wu, Jonn; Fung, Kevin; de Almeida, John R; Bayley, Andrew; Goldstein, David P; Eskander, Antoine; Husain, Zain; Bahig, Houda; Christopoulous, Apostolos; Hier, Michael; Sultanem, Khalil; Richardson, Keith; Mlynarek, Alex; Krishnan, Suren; Le, Hien; Yoo, John; MacNeil, S. D; Mendez, Adrian; Winquist, Eric; Read, Nancy; Venkatesan, Varagur; Kuruvilla, Sara; Warner, Andrew; Mitchell, Sylvia; Corsten, Martin; Rajaraman, Murali; Johnson-Obaseki, Stephanie; Eapen, Libni; Odell, Michael; Chandarana, Shamir; Banerjee, Robyn; Dort, Joseph; Matthews, T. W; Hart, Robert; Kerr, Paul; Dowthwaite, Samuel; Gupta, Michael; Zhang, Han; Wright, Jim; Parker, Christina; Wehrli, Bret; Kwan, Keith; Theurer, Julie; Palma, David AAbstract Background Patients with human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) have substantially better treatment response and overall survival (OS) than patients with HPV-negative disease. Treatment options for HPV+ OPC can involve either a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach (± concomitant chemotherapy) or a primary surgical approach (± adjuvant radiation) with transoral surgery (TOS). These two treatment paradigms have different spectrums of toxicity. The goals of this study are to assess the OS of two de-escalation approaches (primary radiotherapy and primary TOS) compared to historical control, and to compare survival, toxicity and quality of life (QOL) profiles between the two approaches. Methods This is a multicenter phase II study randomizing one hundred and forty patients with T1–2 N0–2 HPV+ OPC in a 1:1 ratio between de-escalated primary radiotherapy (60 Gy) ± concomitant chemotherapy and TOS ± de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy (50–60 Gy based on risk factors). Patients will be stratified based on smoking status (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 pack-years). The primary endpoint is OS of each arm compared to historical control; we hypothesize that a 2-year OS of 85% or greater will be achieved. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, QOL and toxicity. Discussion This study will provide an assessment of two de-escalation approaches to the treatment of HPV+ OPC on oncologic outcomes, QOL and toxicity. Results will inform the design of future definitive phase III trials. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03210103. Date of registration: July 6, 2017, Current version: 1.3 on March 15, 2019.
- ItemOpen AccessUltrasensitive detection of oncogenic human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal tissue swabs(2017-01-14) Isaac, Andre; Kostiuk, Morris; Zhang, Han; Lindsay, Cameron; Makki, Fawaz; O’Connell, Daniel A; Harris, Jeffrey R; Cote, David W J; Seikaly, Hadi; Biron, Vincent LAbstract Background The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) caused by oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is rising worldwide. HPV-OPSCC is commonly diagnosed by RT-qPCR of HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins or by p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been recently reported as an ultra-sensitive and highly precise method of nucleic acid quantification for biomarker analysis. To validate the use of a minimally invasive assay for detection of oncogenic HPV based on oropharyngeal swabs using ddPCR. Secondary objectives were to compare the accuracy of ddPCR swabs to fresh tissue p16 IHC and RT-qPCR, and to compare the cost of ddPCR with p16 IHC. Methods We prospectively included patients with p16+ oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPSCC), and two control groups: p16− OC/OPSCC patients, and healthy controls undergoing tonsillectomy. All underwent an oropharyngeal swab with ddPCR for quantitative detection of E6 and E7 mRNA. Surgical specimens had p16 IHC performed. Agreement between ddPCR and p16 IHC was determined for patients with p16 positive and negative OC/OPSCC as well as for healthy control patients. The sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR of oropharyngeal swabs were calculated against p16 IHC for OPSCC. Results 122 patients were included: 36 patients with p16+OPSCC, 16 patients with p16−OPSCC, 4 patients with p16+OCSCC, 41 patients with p16−OCSCC, and 25 healthy controls. The sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR of oropharyngeal swabs against p16 IHC were 92 and 98% respectively, using 20–50 times less RNA than that required for conventional RT-qPCR. Overall agreement between ddPCR of tissue swabs and p16 of tumor tissue was high at ĸ = 0.826 [0.662-0.989]. Conclusion Oropharyngeal swabs analyzed by ddPCR is a quantitative, rapid, and effective method for minimally invasive oncogenic HPV detection. This assay represents the most sensitive and accurate mode of HPV detection in OPSCC without a tissue biopsy in the available literature.