Kinesiology Research & Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

https://prism.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/100071

Browse

Browsing Kinesiology Research & Publications by Subject "actin"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Molecular Mechanisms of Muscle Contraction: A Historical Perspective
    (Elsevier, 2023-06) Herzog, Walter; Schappacher-Tilp, Gudrun
    Studies of muscle structure and function can be traced to at least 2,000 years ago. However, the modern era of muscle contraction mechanisms started in the 1950s with the classic works by AF Huxley and HE Huxley, both born in the United Kingdom, but not related and working independently. HE Huxley was the first to suggest that muscle contraction occurred through the sliding of two sets of filamentous structures (actin or thin filaments and myosin or thick filaments). AF Huxley then developed a biologically inspired mathematical model suggesting a possible molecular mechanism of how this sliding of actin and myosin might take place. This model then evolved from a two-state to a multi-state model of myosin-actin interactions, and from one that suggested a linear motor causing the sliding to a rotating motor. This model, the cross-bridge model of muscle contraction, is still widely used in biomechanics, and even the more sophisticated cross-bridge models of today still contain many of the features originally proposed by AF Huxley. In 2002, we discovered a hitherto unknown property of muscle contraction that suggested the involvement of passive structures in active force production, the so-called passive force enhancement. It was quickly revealed that this passive force enhancement was caused by the filamentous protein titin, and the three-filament (actin, myosin, and titin) sarcomere model of muscle contraction evolved. There are many suggestions of how these three proteins interact to cause contraction and produce active force, and one such suggestion is described here, but the molecular details of this proposed mechanism still need careful evaluation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A new paradigm for muscle contraction
    (Frontiers in Physiology, 2015-06-10) Herzog, Walter; Powers, Krysta; Johnston, Kaleena; Duvall, Mike
    Muscle contraction has fascinated lay people and scientists for centuries. However, a good understanding of how muscle contraction occurs seemed only possible once microscopy techniques had evolved to a level where basic structural features, such as the regular cross striation patterns of fibers, could be observed in the late 19th century. In the early 20th century, a stimulated muscle was simply considered a new elastic body (Gasser and Hill,1924). Shortening and work production took place with a fixed amount of energy tha twas stored in this body and evolved elastically through stimulation. However, this notion was proven false when Wallace Fenn demonstrated that muscle produced an increasing amount of total energy when increasing its mechanical work output; an observation that was in contradiction with Hill’s elastic body theory (Fenn, 1923,1924). Specifically, Fenn, who worked in the laboratory of Hill and measured heat and work production in frog muscles, found that a muscle allowed to shorten liberated more energy than a muscle held isometrically or a muscle that was stretched. This has become known as the Fenn effect in muscle physiology.