Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPannekoek, Frits, 1949-en
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-14T22:28:27Z
dc.date.available2006-12-14T22:28:27Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationAcadiensis, XXIX, 2 (Spring, 2000), pp. 205-17en
dc.identifier.issn0044-5851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/44173
dc.description.abstractThere is no longer any real dispute that the past, as distinct from traditions, is an invention based on a careful selection of apparently empirical evidence. Historians now accept that there is no "ultimate" truth; there are many perspectives or narratives, all valid and all exploring new realities and new truths. The current multi-streamed discourse in history, however, is fraught with impossible challenges for public historians. Some narratives focus on a heritage of achievement and triumph. Others will focus on exploitation and marginalization, which will in turn be denied by the narratives of the exploiters. Not all narratives can be accommodated equally without creating problems of imbalance or a diet of pablum. Such is the conundrum of the Canadian historian who would like to achieve that pleasant Canadian nirvana ? consensus.en
dc.format.extent7664824 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherUniversity of New Brunswicken
dc.subject.otherCanadian historyen
dc.subject.otherHistorical controversyen
dc.titleWho matters? Public history and the invention of the Canadian pasten
dc.typejournal article
dc.description.refereedYesen
dc.publisher.corporateUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.facultyLibrary & Cultural Resourcesen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/29883
thesis.degree.disciplinePannekoek, Fritsen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record