Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Why Competition from a Multi-Channel E-Tailer Does Not Always Benefit Consumers
Authors: Nault, Barrie R
Jeffers, Patrick
Keywords: Electronic Commerce;Consumers;Retail Industry;Pricing;Prices;Commerce
Issue Date: Feb-2011
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Jeffers, P.I., and B.R. Nault, "Why Competition From a Multi-Channel E-Tailer does Not Always Benefit Consumers," Decision Sciences, 42, 1 (February 2011), 69-91.
Abstract: Empirical studies have delivered mixed conclusions on whether the widely acclaimed assertions of lower electronic retail (e-tail) prices are true and to what extent these prices impact conventional retail prices, profits, and consumer welfare. For goods that require little in-person pre- or postsales support such as CDs, DVDs, and books, we extend Balasubramanian's e-tailer-in-the-center, spatial, circular market model to examine the impact of a multichannel e-tailer's presence on retailers' decisions to relocate, on retail prices and profits, and consumer welfare. We demonstrate several counter-intuitive results. For example, when the disutility of buying online and shipping costs are relatively low, retailers are better off by not relocating in response to an e-tailer's entry into the retail channel. In addition, such an entry-a multichannel strategy-may lead to increased retail prices and increased profits across the industry. Finally, consumers can be better off with less channel competition. The underlying message is that inferences regarding prices, profits, and consumer welfare critically depend on specifications of the good, disutility and shipping costs versus transportation costs (or more generally, positioning), and competition.
Description: John Wiley & Sons, Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF. Link to publisher's version
ISSN: 0011-7315
Appears in Collections:Nault, Barrie R

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.