Liar at First Sight? Early Impressions and Interviewer Judgments, Attributions, and False Perceptions of Faking

atmire.migration.oldid5902
dc.contributor.advisorBourdage, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorWingate, Timothy
dc.contributor.committeememberO'Neill, Thomas
dc.contributor.committeememberSzeto, Andrew
dc.contributor.committeememberMeurs, James
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T15:27:04Z
dc.date.available2017-08-31T15:27:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017en
dc.description.abstractRecent research and theory suggests interviewer characteristics and early impressions might strongly influence later perceptions and judgments of applicant behaviour. In this study, I experimentally investigated the effects of interviewer personality and first impressions of the applicant on later performance judgments, attributions, and perceptions of applicant faking. The sample comprised 247 undergraduate students. Pre-interview qualifications information about the applicant and applicant impression management during the rapport-building stage were manipulated to determine if early information, before the structured question-and-answer stage of the interview, biased interviewers. Findings demonstrated that early impressions altered interviewers’ perceptions and judgments of the applicant. The same applicant, with lower pre- interview qualifications, was judged a worse performer, and perceived as more deceptive in the same videotaped structured stage of the interview. The applicant was also considered less likeable, competent, and dedicated, and more conceited. Conversely, applicant impression management did not have an effect on interviewer impressions and judgments. Interviewer personality also affected perceptions and attributions of the applicant, where more Machiavellian and lower honesty-humility interviewers perceived more faking and made more negative attributions. Interviewer personality, however, did not relate to judgments of applicant fit and suitability. Based on these findings, human resources practitioners are encouraged to exercise caution with information provided to interviewers pre-interview, and researchers are encouraged to suspect interviewer perceptions of faking as symptomatic of interviewer dispositional and early impression biases.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWingate, T. (2017). Liar at First Sight? Early Impressions and Interviewer Judgments, Attributions, and False Perceptions of Faking (Master's thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26754en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/26754
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11023/4055
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subjectPsychology--Industrial
dc.subject.otherFirst impressions
dc.subject.otherImpression formation
dc.subject.otherSelection
dc.subject.otherImpression management
dc.titleLiar at First Sight? Early Impressions and Interviewer Judgments, Attributions, and False Perceptions of Faking
dc.typemaster thesis
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (MSc)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue
Files