Modeling of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Sorption Capacity in Tight Reservoirs Using Machine Learning (ML) Techniques

dc.contributor.advisorKantzas, Apostolos
dc.contributor.authorTavakolian, Mohsen
dc.contributor.committeememberHejazi, Hossein
dc.contributor.committeememberShor, Roman
dc.date2023-06
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T23:55:52Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T23:55:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-19
dc.description.abstractThis work examines different machine learning methods, from shallow to deep learning. It investigates their capability to model 489 sets of experiments with 3806 data points where methane (CH4) and/or carbon dioxide (CO2) sorption capacity of shale and coal have been measured at different reservoir conditions. High-accuracy “integrated” shallow and deep learners/predictors were developed, without splitting the dataset into several batches. The best predictors were Random Forest Regressor (RFR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with more than 98% and 96% accuracy, respectively. The developed models worked well with different combinations of potential features, e.g., gas (CH4 and CO2), rock type (either shale or coal family), TOC (total organic carbon), moisture, temperature, porosity, geological properties, etc., resulting in high accuracy (96 to 98%) for 69 sets of “unseen” experimental data with 1384 data points. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis of the developed predictors showed their alignment with technical expectations of geology and reservoir engineering aspects. Of the best learners, RFR is simpler to apply and quicker to run with higher accuracy and ANN predicts 2% less accuracy on average. However, it operates with less risk of memorizing the data and a higher capability of accurately predicting unseen data. Both models are capable of being applied to lab scale and further developed for their application in reservoir scale simulators. In the end, the developed models are benchmarked against commonly used empirical correlations and pros and cons of each approach are discussed. A new correlation was also developed for CO2 phase change stage and added to this benchmark study.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTavakolian, M. (2023). Modeling of methane and carbon dioxide sorption capacity in tight reservoirs using Machine Learning (ML) techniques (Master's thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/115774
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/40687
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher.facultySchulich School of Engineeringen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.en_US
dc.subjectMethane Sorptionen_US
dc.subjectCO2 Sorptionen_US
dc.subjectCarbon Dioxideen_US
dc.subjectAdsorption Capacityen_US
dc.subjectTight Reservoirsen_US
dc.subjectEnhanced Gas Recoveryen_US
dc.subjectCarbon Storageen_US
dc.subjectMachine Learningen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Networken_US
dc.subject.classificationArtificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.subject.classificationEngineering--Environmentalen_US
dc.subject.classificationEngineering--Petroleumen_US
dc.titleModeling of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Sorption Capacity in Tight Reservoirs Using Machine Learning (ML) Techniquesen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEngineering – Chemical & Petroleumen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgaryen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrueen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ucalgary_2023_tavakolian_mohsen.pdf
Size:
4.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis Manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: