Privacy as a Social Concept
| atmire.migration.oldid | 1720 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Levey, Ann | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nordal, Salvör | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-12-23T18:57:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-03-15T07:00:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-12-23 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | In this thesis I critically examine the traditional account of privacy as a negative right of non-interference and offer instead an alternative framework based on obligations and trust. Privacy is most often described as a value best protected as a right, more accurately as a negative right of non-intrusion. This means that privacy is associated with the private sphere: the individual should be left to decide when he wants to be alone and what he wants to share with others. I begin with an examination of three different distinctions between the public and the private and then I go on to examine two models of privacy: the separation model, where privacy consists of restricted access, and the control model which consists in individual control over certain aspects of one's life. I argue that these models fail to meet many privacy concerns. This becomes most apparent when examining the privacy challenges associated with information technology and biobanks. My alternative account of privacy recognizes how deeply privacy is embedded in social norms and structure. Privacy does not apply to situations where an individual is in isolation, but rather depends on relations to others. This means that privacy is a relational concept: it is an important value in structuring relations between individuals or social institutions. I argue that the framework of rights does not provide an appropriate framework for protecting privacy. Instead, I introduce a framework based on obligations and trust, inspired by Onora O’Neill’s account of perfect and imperfect obligations. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Nordal, S. (2013). Privacy as a Social Concept (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27435 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27435 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11023/1221 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Graduate Studies | |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Calgary | en |
| dc.publisher.place | Calgary | en |
| dc.rights | University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | |
| dc.subject.classification | Privacy | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | obligations | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | Information Technology | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | biobanks | en_US |
| dc.title | Privacy as a Social Concept | |
| dc.type | doctoral thesis | |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Philosophy | |
| thesis.degree.grantor | University of Calgary | |
| thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | |
| ucalgary.item.requestcopy | true |