Predictive factors for reporting adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials - secondary analysis of a systematic review
| dc.contributor.author | Gorrell, Lindsay M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Engel, Roger Mark | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lystad, R. P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brown, Benjamin T. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-18T20:53:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-10-18T20:53:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-08-30 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract: While spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is recommended for the treatment of spinal disorders, concerns exist about adverse events associated with the intervention. Adequate reporting of adverse events in clinical trials would allow for more accurate estimations of incidence statistics through meta-analysis. However, it is not currently known if there are factors influencing adverse events reporting following SMT in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Thus our objective was to investigate predictive factors for the reporting of adverse events in published RCTs involving SMT. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for RCTs involving SMT. Domains of interest included: sample size; publication date relative to the 2010 CONSORT statement; risk of bias; the region treated; and number of intervention sessions. 7,398 records were identified, of which 368 articles were eligible for inclusion. A total of 140 (38.0%) articles reported on adverse events. Articles were more likely to report on adverse events if they: possessed larger sample sizes, were published after the 2010 CONSORT statement, had a low risk of bias and involved multiple intervention sessions. The region treated was not a significant predictor for reporting on adverse events. Predictors for reporting on adverse events included: larger sample size, publication after the 2010 CONSORT statement, low risk of bias and trials involving multiple intervention sessions. We recommend that researchers focus on developing robust methodologies and participant follow-up regimens for RCTs involving SMT. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Gorrell, L. M., Engel, R. M., Lystad, R. P., & Brown, B. T. (2017). Predictive factors for reporting adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials - secondary analysis of a systematic review. "Musculeoskeletal Science and Practice", 30, 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.05.002 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.05.002 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/34265 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108900 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Musculeoskeletal Science and Practice | en_US |
| dc.publisher.department | Human Performance Lab | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Kinesiology | en_US |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Calgary | en_US |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Calgary | en_US |
| dc.publisher.policy | https://www.elsevier.com/?a=91173 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
| dc.title | Predictive factors for reporting adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials - secondary analysis of a systematic review | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Predictive factors for reporting adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials - secondary analysis of a systematic review | en_US |
| dc.type | journal article | en_US |