Vengeful Decisions: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Costliness of Revenge

atmire.migration.oldid1271
dc.contributor.advisorBoon, Susan
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Kyler
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-28T16:32:02Z
dc.date.available2013-11-12T08:00:15Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-28
dc.date.submitted2013en
dc.description.abstractConventional wisdom suggests that individuals who decide to get even are driven by their emotions and cannot be swayed by considering the potential consequences of their actions. If this is the case, then perceptions of revenge’s consequences—its effectiveness and costliness—should be unrelated to the likelihood of taking revenge. The present study examined the relationships between these variables among 199 undergraduates. We had participants imagine that their romantic partners had cheated on them, and asked them to list the consequences, both positive and negative, of getting even, along with their perceptions of how effective and how costly revenge would be. We also asked participants to rate their endorsement of particular goals following a provocation. Ratings of revenge’s effectiveness are largely related to the positive consequences of getting even, while ratings of revenge’s costliness are largely related to revenge’s negative consequences. Goal endorsement is related to perceiving some potential responses to a provocation as more effective than others. Judgments of effectiveness and costliness predicted significant variance in the likelihood of engaging in revenge (R2 = .59) suggesting that perceptions of effectiveness and costliness may play a more important role in revenge decision making than previously thought. A significant Effectiveness X Costliness X Anger interaction (β = .89, p = .02) helps clarify how such perceptions are related to the likelihood of getting even. Implications and future directions are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRasmussen, K. (2013). Vengeful Decisions: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Costliness of Revenge (Master's thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/28638en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/28638
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11023/899
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyArts
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subjectSocial
dc.subject.classificationrevengeen_US
dc.subject.classificationperceived consequencesen_US
dc.subject.classificationjusticeen_US
dc.titleVengeful Decisions: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Costliness of Revenge
dc.typemaster thesis
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (MSc)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ucalgary_2013_rasmussen_kyler.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: