Sharing Space: Habitat Use and Spatial Relationships of Frugivorous Lemurs in Fragmented Forests

atmire.migration.oldid6052
dc.contributor.advisorJohnson, Steig Eric
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Sheila Marie
dc.contributor.committeememberGordon, Adam D.
dc.contributor.committeememberMoehrenschlager, Axel
dc.contributor.committeememberRolian, Campbell Paul
dc.contributor.committeememberNeuhaus, Peter
dc.contributor.committeememberHenzi, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T19:03:13Z
dc.date.available2017-09-27T19:03:13Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017en
dc.description.abstractI studied the habitat use and interspecific association patterns of red-bellied, red-fronted, and black-and-white ruffed lemurs at Kianjavato, Madagascar. I also investigated the flexible intraspecific association patterns of black-and-white ruffed lemurs. These studies took place in two forest patches of different sizes and disturbance levels within a largely-deforested landscape. Results sometimes differed across forest fragments, indicating potential impacts of fragment size and/or vegetation structure on habitat use and association patterns. All three species used trees with broader crowns more heavily, underscoring the importance of this limited resource. Fruit availability also influenced ruffed lemur habitat use and subgroup size. This species also showed some avoidance of the forest edge and tended to form larger groups of adults when offspring were present. Both red-bellied lemurs and red-fronted lemurs showed avoidance of ruffed lemur core use areas, though they did not avoid one another spatiotemporally. Red-fronted lemurs actually showed positive spatiotemporal associations with both ruffed lemurs and red-bellied lemurs. This was positively related to the amount of core area overlap between groups, and may have been related to the resources and predators shared by these three species. Currently, spatial avoidance of core areas and small differences in diet may facilitate the coexistence of these three species, though red-bellied lemurs may be limited to more marginal habitat in some cases. Future changes to the forest (i.e., deforestation or reforestation) should be monitored, as they may alter both habitat use and association patterns.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHolmes, S. M. (2017). Sharing Space: Habitat Use and Spatial Relationships of Frugivorous Lemurs in Fragmented Forests (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27773en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11023/4145
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subjectForestry and Wildlife
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectZoology
dc.subject.otherLemur
dc.subject.otherMadagascar
dc.subject.otherFission-fusion dynamics
dc.subject.otherHabitat use
dc.subject.otherInterspecific association
dc.titleSharing Space: Habitat Use and Spatial Relationships of Frugivorous Lemurs in Fragmented Forests
dc.typedoctoral thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineAnthropology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue
Files