An Examination of Executive Control Biases and Rumination in Currently, Remitted and Never Depressed Individuals

Simple item page
atmire.migration.oldid5444
dc.contributor.advisorDobson, Keith
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, Leanne
dc.contributor.committeememberPexman, Penelope
dc.contributor.committeememberSears, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T21:29:26Z
dc.date.available2017-04-21T21:29:26Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017en
dc.description.abstractCognitive theories of depression propose that biases in executive control may be involved in the development, maintenance, and/or recurrence of depression. One suggested mechanism is that executive control biases may contribute to depressive rumination. The primary purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate depression-related biases in three components of executive control, namely inhibition, working memory updating, and set shifting. The secondary purpose was to evaluate relationships among biases in executive control and rumination. Currently depressed (n = 53), remitted depressed (n = 55), and non-clinical control (n = 51) participants were tested on separate computer-based paradigms designed to measure inhibition, working memory updating, and set shifting, respectively, involving emotional stimuli. As hypothesized, currently depressed participants exhibited biases in each of the executive control components. Specifically, currently depressed participants showed a reduced ability to inhibit the processing of negative distracting stimuli and to update working memory with emotional information, relative to control participants. Currently depressed participants also had greater difficulty shifting away from an emotion-relevant task set than from an emotion-irrelevant task set, whereas control participants did not show this bias. Remitted depressed participants did not demonstrate similar biases to currently depressed participants. Hypotheses regarding the relationships among executive control biases and rumination were largely unsupported; possible explanations for these findings are considered. This study is the most comprehensive evaluation of executive control biases in clinical depression to date, and provides novel insight into the nature of depression-related biases. The theoretical and clinical relevance of the findings, the limitations of the study, and directions for future research are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationQuigley, L. (2017). An Examination of Executive Control Biases and Rumination in Currently, Remitted and Never Depressed Individuals (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/24876en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/24876
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11023/3710
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subjectPsychology--Clinical
dc.subject.otherDepression
dc.subject.otherExecutive control
dc.subject.otherRumination
dc.subject.otherRemitted depression
dc.subject.otherCognitive biases
dc.titleAn Examination of Executive Control Biases and Rumination in Currently, Remitted and Never Depressed Individuals
dc.typedoctoral thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineClinical Psychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue
Files
Collections
Open Theses and Dissertations