Evaluating the Masters of Strategy: A Comparative Analysis of Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, Mahan, and Corbett
dc.contributor.author | Fitzsimmons, Scott | |
dc.contributor.editor | Fitzsimmons, Scott | |
dc.contributor.editor | McDougall, Alex | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-18T19:50:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-18T19:50:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper provides a brief overview of major inter-theoretical relationships between the works of Carl von Calusewitz, Sun Tzu, Alfred Mahan, and Julian Corbett. Specifically, it undertakes a comparative analysis of these authors’ writings on the nature of war; the use of theory in the study of warfare; the primacy of politics; limited and absolute war; the principle of decisive battle; the principle of concentration; the role of the people in war; friction, uncertainty, and the means to overcome these problems; and the offence and defence in war. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1480-6339 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1480-6378 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/112877 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38472 | |
dc.publisher.department | Political Science | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Arts | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Calgary | |
dc.rights | © Innovations: A Journal of Politics 1998-2040 | |
dc.title | Evaluating the Masters of Strategy: A Comparative Analysis of Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, Mahan, and Corbett | |
dc.type | journal article |