Evaluating the Masters of Strategy: A Comparative Analysis of Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, Mahan, and Corbett

dc.contributor.authorFitzsimmons, Scott
dc.contributor.editorFitzsimmons, Scott
dc.contributor.editorMcDougall, Alex
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T19:50:23Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T19:50:23Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a brief overview of major inter-theoretical relationships between the works of Carl von Calusewitz, Sun Tzu, Alfred Mahan, and Julian Corbett. Specifically, it undertakes a comparative analysis of these authors’ writings on the nature of war; the use of theory in the study of warfare; the primacy of politics; limited and absolute war; the principle of decisive battle; the principle of concentration; the role of the people in war; friction, uncertainty, and the means to overcome these problems; and the offence and defence in war.
dc.identifier.issn1480-6339
dc.identifier.issn1480-6378
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/112877
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38472
dc.publisher.departmentPolitical Science
dc.publisher.facultyArts
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgary
dc.rights© Innovations: A Journal of Politics 1998-2040
dc.titleEvaluating the Masters of Strategy: A Comparative Analysis of Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, Mahan, and Corbett
dc.typejournal article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
innovations_vol7_3_fitzsimmons-evaluatingthemastersofstrategy.pdf
Size:
123.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.94 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Collections