The incompatibility of lexical derivation and post-lexical arguments*

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRitter, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorRosen, Sara Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-17T20:53:40Z
dc.date.available2016-06-17T20:53:40Z
dc.date.issued1995-01
dc.descriptionElizabeth Ritter, University of Calgary; Sara Thomas Rosen, University of Kansas
dc.description.abstractIn the present paper we demonstrate that the aspectual role CAUSER is syntactically assigned. This assumption allows a principled distinction between indirect causers and agents; it also accounts for restrictions on argument inheritance in lexical derivation, including the restriction against derivation of causativized verbs discussed in Pesetsky (1992), and the failure of -er nominalization of causativized verbs noted in Brousseau and Ritter (1991).en_US
dc.description.refereedYesen_US
dc.identifier.citationRitter, E., & Rosen, S. T. (1995). The incompatibility of lexical derivation and post-lexical arguments*. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(Winter), 11-16.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/28918
dc.identifier.issn2371-2643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/51378
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Calgaryen_US
dc.publisher.departmentLinguisticsen_US
dc.publisher.facultyArtsen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen_US
dc.subjectLinguisticsen_US
dc.subjectSyntaxen_US
dc.subjectGrammar, Comparative and general--Aspecten_US
dc.titleThe incompatibility of lexical derivation and post-lexical arguments*en_US
dc.typejournal article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
017_Winter_95_Ritter & Rosen.pdf
Size:
195.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Volume 17, Winter 1995