Project Approval Decisions: Exploring Success Factors

atmire.migration.oldid1737
dc.contributor.advisorHartman, Francis
dc.contributor.authorNada, Diana
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T18:36:18Z
dc.date.available2014-03-15T07:00:18Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-07
dc.date.submitted2013en
dc.description.abstractLittle research has explored the critical point where a project is created: the sanctioning of the money to invest. This research is an exploratory investigation into this key point in the evolution of a project. Specifically, it focuses on the context within which the investment decision is made. This research investigated the interaction between the decision makers, the executives, and the project management (PM) groups from just before the decision is made to just after the project team gets its mandate. The qualitative investigation considered expert opinion that was solicited from two groups: executives and project managers. Modified Delphi surveys and semi-structured interviews were used. The findings of this thesis show that there is a disconnection between the decisions made at the executive level, and their interpretation by those who deliver the project. The context in which both groups communicate and share information is split into two distinct worlds when justifying fund approvals and delivering projects. One that is politically correct and visible, and a pragmatic one that is needed to get the job done –generally kept invisible. Key discoveries included identifying seven key factors that influence the success of a project investment decision, identification of a critical disconnect between the decision makers and the project implementers resulting from a number of factors that culminate in key observation and recommendation. The observation is that missing critical information is not transferred from one group to the other because it appears to be 'so obvious' to that group that it does not occur to the group to share it and because it is sufficiently opaque – or of little interest – to the other group that they do not require this important information. Both groups should work on bridging this disconnect. Value creation should be a reflective focus under a common understanding of the business and project intent and setting minimum expectation for the quality of the information shared and communicated. One possible part of a solution is creating a new and more diverse career path that exposes executives to their realities of project management and project managers to the world of executive decision-making.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNada, D. (2014). Project Approval Decisions: Exploring Success Factors (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27451en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11023/1240
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subjectBusiness Administration--Management
dc.subjectEngineering--Civil
dc.subjectPsychology--Behavioral
dc.subject.classificationManagementen_US
dc.subject.classificationneuroeconomicsen_US
dc.subject.classificationdecision-makingen_US
dc.subject.classificationapprovalsen_US
dc.subject.classificationqualitativeen_US
dc.subject.classificationdelphien_US
dc.subject.classificationexploratoryen_US
dc.subject.classificationdisconnecten_US
dc.subject.classificationSuccessen_US
dc.subject.classificationProjecten_US
dc.titleProject Approval Decisions: Exploring Success Factors
dc.typedoctoral thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ucalgary_2013_diana_nada.pdf
Size:
2.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main thesis file
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ucalgary_2013_diana_nada_appendices.pdf
Size:
2.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Appendices
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: