Enhanced Longitudinal Analysis of Bone Strength Estimated by 3D Bone Imaging and the Finite Element Method

dc.contributor.advisorBoyd, Steven Kyle
dc.contributor.authorPlett, Ryan Michael
dc.contributor.committeememberDuncan, Neil A.
dc.contributor.committeememberManske, Sarah Lynn
dc.contributor.committeememberKim, Keekyoung
dc.contributor.committeememberEdwards, William Brent
dc.date2020-11
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-07T18:26:00Z
dc.date.available2020-10-07T18:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-06
dc.description.abstractThree-dimensional (3D) imaging with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and micro-finite element (FE) analysis provides important insight into bone health. Longitudinal analyses of bone morphology maximize precision by using 2D slice-matching registration (SM) or 3D rigid-body registration (3DR) to account for repositioning error between scans, however, the compatibility of these techniques with FE for longitudinal bone strength estimates is limited. This work developed and validated a FE approach for longitudinal HR-pQCT studies using 3DR to maximize reproducibility by fully accounting for misalignment between images. Using a standard imaging protocol, ex vivo (N=10) and in vivo (N=40) distal radius HR-pQCT images were acquired to estimate the efficacy of 3DR to reduce longitudinal variability due to repositioning error and assess the sensitivity of this method to detect true changes in bone strength. In our proposed approach, the full common bone volume defined by 3DR for serial scans was used for FE. Standard FE parameters were estimated by no registration (NR), SM, and 3DR. Ex vivo reproducibility was estimated by the least significant change (LSC) in each parameter with a ground truth of zero change in longitudinal estimates. In vivo reproducibility was estimated by the standard deviation of the rate of change (σ) with an ideal value that was minimized to define true changes in longitudinal estimates. Group-wise comparisons of ex vivo and in vivo reproducibility found that FE reproducibility was improved by both SM (CVRMS<0.80%) and 3DR (CVRMS<0.62%) compared to NR (CVRMS~2%), and 3DR was advantageous as repositioning error increased. Although 3D registration did not negate motion artifacts, it played an important role in detecting and reducing variability in FE estimates for longitudinal study designs. Therefore, 3D registration is ideally suited for estimating in vivo effects of interventions in longitudinal studies of bone strength.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPlett, R. M. (2020). Enhanced Longitudinal Analysis of Bone Strength Estimated by 3D Bone Imaging and the Finite Element Method (Master's thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38327
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/112672
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher.facultySchulich School of Engineeringen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.en_US
dc.subjectBone Imagingen_US
dc.subjectFinite Element Analysisen_US
dc.subjectImage Registrationen_US
dc.subjectHR-pQCTen_US
dc.subject.classificationRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationEngineering--Biomedicalen_US
dc.subject.classificationEngineering--Mechanicalen_US
dc.titleEnhanced Longitudinal Analysis of Bone Strength Estimated by 3D Bone Imaging and the Finite Element Methoden_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEngineering – Biomedicalen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgaryen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrueen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ucalgary_2020_plett_ryan.pdf
Size:
7.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: