It May Be Wrong, But Is It Illegal? – Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition v. Flett and the Limits of Discretionary Decision-making

dc.contributor.authorKennett, Steven A.eng
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-24T20:59:26Z
dc.date.available2009-04-24T20:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description.abstractThis article comments on Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition v. Flett, a recent case concerning the expansion of Castle Mountain Resort in southwestern Alberta. The court’s reasons for quashing decisions by a senior official and a Minister have important implications for discretionary decision-making within Alberta’s environmental assessment regime.
dc.description.refereedNoeng
dc.description.sponsorshipNewsletter funded by Nexen Inc. and Fraser Milner Casgrain. Project funded by the Alberta Law Foundation.eng
dc.identifier.citation(Fall 2004) 88 Resources 1eng
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/34397
dc.identifier.issn0714-5918
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/47053
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherCanadian Institute of Resources Laweng
dc.publisher.corporateUniversity of Calgaryeng
dc.publisher.facultyLaweng
dc.publisher.urlhttp://www.cirl.caeng
dc.titleIt May Be Wrong, But Is It Illegal? – Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition v. Flett and the Limits of Discretionary Decision-makingeng
dc.typeNewslettereng
thesis.degree.disciplineCanadian Institute of Resources Laweng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Resources88.pdf
Size:
302.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.86 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: