Werklund School of Education
Permanent URI for this community
The work of the Werklund School of Education is learning. Research is an engaging way of learning what is not already yet known, or probing what is already known but in new ways. Within the Werklund School of Education, the research conducted by our professors and students is incredibly diverse.
Browse
Browsing Werklund School of Education by Title
Now showing 1 - 20 of 678
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access 1 Chapter One -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: Three Professional Practice Standards: A Watershed Moment(2019-06-30) Stelmach, Bonnie; O’Connor, Barbara; Brandon, JimThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access 101 Ways to Market Your Language Program: A Practical Guide for Language Schools and Programs (1st ed.)(2024-12-01) Eaton, Sarah ElaineThis is a re-release of the the original 2002 first edition of this book. The author and copyright holder has released this as an open access work under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This book provides 101 ideas and strategies to empower overall marketing efforts: (1) "Put On Your Thinking Cap" (e.g., define the problem before marketing it, set reasonable goals, and create a niche); (2) "Secrets to Boost Your Marketing Power" (e.g., emphasize the benefits, check out the competition, and sell oneself in as many languages as possible); (3) "Marketing Materials: Tools and Tips to Do the Job Better" (e.g., make a brochure, get mentioned in other brochures, and make it easy to phone for information); (4) "Going Beyond the Basics to Increase Enrollment" (e.g, offer volume discounts and guarantees and give away tuition); (5) "Specialty Tips for Programs at Large Institutions" (e.g., make sure the Web site is easy to find, partner with other educational programs, and get the program mentioned in the calendar); (6) "The Power of People: A Human Touch to Increase Enrollment and Polish Your Image" (e.g., build loyalty with host families, establish win-win relationships, and follow exceptional service standards); (7) "Continue Marketing While Your Students are Enrolled" (e.g., meet students at the airport, partner with local businesses, and create happy memories); and (8) "How to Keep Marketing Once Your Program is Finished" (e.g., create an alumni network, review successes and failures, and plan ahead for next year).Item Open Access 15 Strategies to Detect Contract Cheating(2020-09-25) Eaton, Sarah ElaineThis resource for educators offers concrete strategies to identify and detect contract cheating.Item Open Access 2 Chapter Two -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: What is Optimum Learning?(2019-06-30) Friesen, Sharon; Brown, Barbara; Brandon, JimThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access 20 years of 'technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm': the ethnography as a research method in organizational studies(University of Calgary, 2018-09-17) Gatti, Wilian JrItem Open Access 2019 International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating: Event Brief(2019-10-18) Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Chibry, NancyThis document documents the University of Calgary events to mark the 2019 International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating. It serves as an important historical reference of who was involved, as well as what activities were planned and delivered.Item Open Access 25 Strategies to Prevent Plagiarism(2020-09-25) Eaton, Sarah ElaineThis teaching resource offers educators practical strategies for preventing plagiarism.Item Open Access 3 Chapter Three -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: Policy Implementation, Interpretation, Enactment, and Outcomes(2019-06-30) Hunter, Darryl; Brandon, JimThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access 4 Chapter Four -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: Who Uses a Standards-based Approach to Improving Professional Practice, and Why?(2019-06-30) Adams, Pamela; Allan, Sharon; Brandon, JimThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access 5 Chapter Five -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: Supporting the Implementation of Standards(2019-06-30) Stelmach, Bonnie; O'Connor, Barbara; Brandon, JimThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access 6 Chapter Six -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: What is Quality Teaching?(2019-06-30) Brandon, Jim; Parsons, Dennis; Brown, Barbara; Friesen, Sharon; Thomas, Christy; Delanoy, NadiaThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access 6 Tenets of Postplagiarism: Writing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [Infographic](2023-02-24) Eaton, Sarah Elaine EatonIn this infographic, sections of the final chapter of Plagiarism in Higher Education: Tackling Tough Topics in Academic Integrity (ABC Clio, 2021) are summarized. The concept of post-plagiarism is explained in world where artificial intelligence (e.g., ChatGPT, Large Language Models (LLMs), GPT-3, etc.) are becoming commonplace. The connections between artificial intelligence, plagiarism, and academic misconduct are explored. Keywords: artificial intelligence, academic integrity, plagiarism, academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, academic writing, ChatGPT, GPT-3, Large Language Models, higher educationItem Open Access 7 Chapter Seven -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: What is Quality School Leadership?(2019-06-30) Mombourquette, Carmen; Sproule, Leonard; Brandon, JimThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access 8 Chapter Eight -- Optimum Learning Literature Synthesis: What is Quality System Leadership?(2019-06-30) Brandon, JimThis synthesis of the literature is designed to undergird our 4-university longitudinal mixed methods study Optimum Learning for All Students Implementing Alberta’s 2018 Professional Practice Standards. Our ambition is to gain insights into how and how well Alberta’s Teaching Quality Standard, Leadership Quality Standard, and Superintendent Leadership Quality Standard are being put into place, how the standards are impacting practice, and what changes occur over time in teaching and learning. Indeed, our longitudinal design is premised on “uncovering sustained changes and implementation success” (Derrington, 2019, p. 8). Given this, our goals in preparing this manuscript were to (a) synthesize scholarship on policy processes so that we can situate our inquiry into the standards in a process-oriented way; (b) provide a jurisdictional review of standards-based approaches to teaching and leadership and what we know to be effective with respect to this approach so that we can discern how Alberta’s standards and pathways to certification are positioned compared to others who have gone before us; and (c) synthesize scholarship that demonstrates the link between the professional practice standards and quality teaching and leadership so that we are anchored to evidence when interpreting the forthcoming empirical data. Considering the comprehensiveness of the professional practice standards, we covered the waterfront, so to speak. But though we plumbed many strands and sources of knowledge, we do not claim it to be exhaustive or necessarily complete.Item Open Access A 'Fear' Studies Perspective and Critique: Analyzing English's and Stengel's Progressive Study of Fear and Learning in Education Theory(In Search of Fearlessness Research Institute, 2011) Fisher, R. M.The author critiques the progressive approach of two contemporary educational philosophers (English and Stengel) on the topic of fear and learning. Using a postmodern integral approach (i.e., fearanalysis), this article examines the tendency of reductionism, individualism, and psychologism as part of a hegemonoic liberalism and modernism in discourses on fear and learning commonly adopted by educators....Item Open Access A Collaborative Instructor and TA Approach to Online Teaching and Learning(2021-05-05) Delanoy, Nadia; Chen, DanniThis vignette presents the reflections of Instructor Dr. Nadia Delanoy and Teaching Assistant (TA) Danni Chen on a semester-long collaborative approach to teaching and learning. We hope this reflection provides insight into the attitudes towards collaboration between instructor and TA. In the following, we outline our collaboration in the graduate course, EDER 619.89 Inclusive Education - A Shared Responsibility, the changes implemented with the class, and demonstrate how our collaboration contributed to continuous improvements to the student learning experience.Item Open Access A Comprehensive Academic Integrity (CAI) Framework: An Overview(2023-04-11) Eaton, Sarah ElaineIn this brief overview, I introduce the Comprehensive Academic Integrity (CAI) framework. The CAI framework includes eight (8) overlapping and intertwined elements: (1) everyday ethics, (2) institutional ethics, (3) ethical leadership, (4) professional and collegial ethics; (5) instructional ethics, (6) student academic conduct, (7) research integrity and ethics, and (8) publication ethics. The central argument of this framework is that academic integrity must encompass, but extend beyond, notions of student conduct, and should be considered a foundation of all aspects of education. Keywords: academic integrity, student conduct, student affairs, research ethics, research integrity, publication ethics, instructional ethics, pedagogy, everyday ethics, experiential learning, definition, ethical decision-making, morals, values, virtues, leadership, equity, diversity, inclusion, accessibility, justice, decolonization, IndigenizationItem Open Access A deep dive into Canadian college policy: Findings from a provincial academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis(2019-03-08) Thacker, Emma; Miron, Jennifer B.; Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Stoesz, Brenda M.This research examines how Canadian colleges address contract cheating in their academic integrity policies. The study analysed policies from 24 publicly-funded Ontario colleges, focusing on the language used to define contract cheating and the principles guiding these policies. Researchers found significant variation in how contract cheating is handled, with many policies indirectly addressing the issue. The study highlights a need for clearer, more explicit definitions of contract cheating within these policies and suggests further research to improve policy effectiveness. The findings provide a basis for evidence-informed policy development and revision in Canadian post-secondary institutions. This is a sub-project of the Academic Integrity in Canda: National Policy Analysis project. Cite as: Thacker, E., Miron, J. B., Eaton, S. E., & Stoesz, B. M. (2019, March 8, March 8). A deep dive into Canadian college policy: Findings from a provincial academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI) Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.Item Open Access A deep dive into Canadian college policy: Findings from a provincial academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis(2019-04-17) Thacker, Emma; Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Stoesz, Brenda M.; Miron, Jennifer B.We share the findings from our study of contract cheating in institutional policies from Ontario post-secondary colleges. We studied 22 publicly funded colleges in the province of Ontario, Canada. This study is significant because it may serve to inform policy development of post-secondary institutions in other regions of Canada. Contract cheating itself is not new. The influence of technology and social media, however, are changing the landscape creating the need for higher educational institutions (HEIs) to respond to this phenomenon (Ellis, Zucker, & Randall, 2018). HEIs across the globe are beginning to respond to the phenomenon through amended academic integrity policies and procedures. Australia and Britain, for example, have published documents that address contract cheating, providing robust recommendations to support academic integrity (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency [TEQSA], 2017; QAA, 2017). Among these is a recommendation to review policy language and process in the context of contract cheating. To date, a review on contract cheating in Canada has not been conducted. This research serves as the initial concentrated and focused assessment of Canadian policy in higher education organizations around contract cheating. In this session, we share the preliminary findings from our study. The framework and methodology from previous work on academic integrity policy analysis (Bretag et al., 2011; Grigg, 2010) served as an exemplar for this work. We began by identifying publicly-funded colleges in Ontario, collecting academic integrity policy documents, including the principles and approaches to the policies, analyzing them with a focus the topic of contract cheating. The analysis showed how publicly-funded colleges in Ontario characterize the concept of contract cheating. At the end of the session, participants will have a framework to undertake similar research and continue to contribute to a body of knowledge important to higher educational institutions around the world. In addition, participants will be able to characterize their own institutions’ approaches to academic integrity and specifically contract cheating in policy. The researchers aim to provide evidence to support Canadian policy makers to better address contract cheating across higher educational institutions. This session provides an opportunity to describe an evidenced informed framework for developing academic policy that targets the uniqueness of contract cheating. This is a sub-project of the Academic Integrity in Canda: National Policy Analysis project. Suggested citation: Thacker, E., Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., & Miron, J. B. (2019, April 17). A deep dive into Canadian college policy: Findings from a provincial academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity, Calgary, Canada. https://hdl.handle.net/1880/120534Item Open Access A Guide to Ken Wilber and the Education Literature: Annotated Bibliography(In Search of Fearlessness Research Institute, 2007) Fisher, R. M.