Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Methodological and Epistemological Issues in the Interpretation of Infant Cognitive Development
Authors: Müller, Ulrich
Giesbrecht, Gerald
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: Child Development
Citation: Müller, U., & Giesbrecht, G.F. (2008). Methodological and epistemological issues in the interpretation of infant cognitive development. Child Development, 79, 1654-1658.
Abstract: This commentary on J. Kagan (2008) addresses 2 issues. The first concerns the importance of studying developmental sequences and processes of change. The second concerns epistemological differences between contemporary neonativist approaches and classical theories of development. The commentary argues that classical theories of infant cognition and contemporary neonativist theories fundamentally differ in terms of how they conceptualize the workings of the mind. These differences affect the meaning of terms such as representation and reasoning. Also discussed are implications of epistemological differences for developmental explanations. The commentary concludes that epistemological differences must be articulated more fully in order to improve understanding of different theories and in order to evaluate the relative merits and shortcomings of those theories.
Description: Article deposited according to publisher policies:
Appears in Collections:Giesbrecht, Gerald

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Methodological and Epistemological Issues in the Interpretation of Infant Cognitive Development PDF.pdfArticle PDF59.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.