• Information Technology
  • Human Resources
  • Careers
  • Giving
  • Library
  • Bookstore
  • Active Living
  • Continuing Education
  • Go Dinos
  • UCalgary Maps
  • UCalgary Directory
  • Academic Calendar
My UCalgary
Webmail
D2L
ARCHIBUS
IRISS
  • Faculty of Arts
  • Cumming School of Medicine
  • Faculty of Environmental Design
  • Faculty of Graduate Studies
  • Haskayne School of Business
  • Faculty of Kinesiology
  • Faculty of Law
  • Faculty of Nursing
  • Faculty of Nursing (Qatar)
  • Schulich School of Engineering
  • Faculty of Science
  • Faculty of Social Work
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
  • Werklund School of Education
  • Information TechnologiesIT
  • Human ResourcesHR
  • Careers
  • Giving
  • Library
  • Bookstore
  • Active Living
  • Continuing Education
  • Go Dinos
  • UCalgary Maps
  • UCalgary Directory
  • Academic Calendar
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources
View Item 
  •   PRISM Home
  • Journals and Series
  • Calgary (Working) Papers in Linguistics
  • Volume 16, Winter 1994
  • View Item
  •   PRISM Home
  • Journals and Series
  • Calgary (Working) Papers in Linguistics
  • Volume 16, Winter 1994
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Two research paradigms for discourse analysis

Thumbnail
Download
016_Winter_94_Prideaux.pdf (384.8Kb)
Download Record
Download to EndNote/RefMan (RIS)
Download to BibTex
Author
Prideaux, Gary D
Accessioned
2016-06-17T19:54:29Z
Available
2016-06-17T19:54:29Z
Issued
1994-01
Subject
Linguistics
Sociolinguistics
Discourse analysis
Pragmatics
Type
journal article
Metadata
Show full item record

Abstract
Discourse analysis covers a vast range of types of language use, including onversations, monologues of various sorts (lectures, sermons, political speeches), narratives, jokes, and much else in both oral and written modes. It is not surprising, therefore, that quite distinct approaches to discourse have evolved, often with very different research orientations, methodologies, and data sources. In this short contribution, a characterization is offered of two typical research paradigms in discourse analysis. One approach derives primarily from concerns of a sociological and sociolinguistic nature and the other from the perspective of experimental psycholinguistics and cognitive science.
Refereed
Yes
Gary Prideaux, University of Alberta
 
Citation
Prideaux, G. D. (1994). Two research paradigms for discourse analysis. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 16(Winter), 31-38.
Department
Linguistics
Faculty
Arts
Institution
University of Calgary
Publisher
University of Calgary
Doi
http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/28912
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51368
Collections
  • Volume 16, Winter 1994

Browse

All of PRISMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Download Results

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

  • Email
  • SMS
  • 403.220.8895
  • Live Chat

Energize: The Campaign for Eyes High

Privacy Policy
Website feedback

University of Calgary
2500 University Drive NW
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
CANADA

Copyright © 2017