Identifying contexts and mechanisms in multiple behavior change interventions affecting smoking cessation success: a rapid realist review

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMinian, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorCorrin, Tricia
dc.contributor.authorLingam, Mathangee
dc.contributor.authordeRuiter, Wayne K
dc.contributor.authorRodak, Terri
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Valerie H
dc.contributor.authorManson, Heather
dc.contributor.authorDragonetti, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorZawertailo, Laurie
dc.contributor.authorMelamed, Osnat C
dc.contributor.authorHahn, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorSelby, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-14T00:03:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-14T00:03:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-12
dc.date.updated2020-06-14T00:03:18Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Smoking continues to be a leading cause of preventable chronic disease-related morbidity and mortality, excess healthcare expenditure, and lost work productivity. Tobacco users are disproportionately more likely to be engaging in other modifiable risk behaviours such as excess alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, and poor diet. While hundreds of interventions addressing the clustering of smoking and other modifiable risk behaviours have been conducted worldwide, there is insufficient information available about the context and mechanisms in these interventions that promote successful smoking cessation. The aim of this rapid realist review was to identify possible contexts and mechanisms used in multiple health behaviour change interventions (targeting tobacco and two or more additional risk behaviours) that are associated with improving smoking cessation outcome. Methods This realist review method incorporated the following steps: (1) clarifying the scope, (2) searching for relevant evidence, (3) relevance confirmation, data extraction, and quality assessment, (4) data analysis and synthesis. Results Of the 20,423 articles screened, 138 articles were included in this realist review. Following Michie et al.’s behavior change model (the COM-B model), capability, opportunity, and motivation were used to identify the mechanisms of behaviour change. Universally, increasing opportunities (i.e. factors that lie outside the individual that prompt the behaviour or make it possible) for participants to engage in healthy behaviours was associated with smoking cessation success. However, increasing participant’s capability or motivation to make a behaviour change was only successful within certain contexts. Conclusion In order to address multiple health behaviours and assist individuals in quitting smoking, public health promotion interventions need to shift away from ‘individualistic epidemiology’ and invest resources into modifying factors that are external from the individual (i.e. creating a supportive environment). Trial registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017064430
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):918
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08973-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/112169
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/44133
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleIdentifying contexts and mechanisms in multiple behavior change interventions affecting smoking cessation success: a rapid realist review
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12889_2020_Article_8973.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications