Experimental and Mechanism Study of Superheated SAGD vs. Conventional SAGD Technique: A Cost-Effective Scheme for Superheated SAGD

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Ke
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Siyuan
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Qi
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yang
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-01T08:00:38Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T08:00:38Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-27
dc.date.updated2022-05-01T08:00:37Z
dc.description.abstractSteam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is one of the steam injection techniques to exploit heavy oil and extra heavy oil resources, where the nature of steam is crucial to the production efficiency. Replacing saturated steam with superheated steam can effectively improve the steam quality at the bottom of the well and the production efficiency. In this study, based on the 2-D SAGD experiments, the recovery mechanisms of SAGD under the 220°C saturated steam and 260°C (superheated degree of 40°C) and 300°C (superheated degree of 80°C) superheated steam are compared and analyzed. The numerical model was developed based on experimental results, and the influence of steam superheated degree on the recovery degree of the SAGD process was further investigated. The physical experiment results and numerical simulation results show that the advantages of high enthalpy and large specific volume of superheated steam are significant at the horizontal expansion stage of the steam chamber stage compared to those of saturated steam. However, although the superheated steam can improve the recovery degree, the economic efficiency may decrease with the addition of superheated steam since it requires higher energy to generate the superheated steam. Thus, the SOR (steam-oil ratio) cannot appropriately describe the energy and economic efficiency when superheated steam is considered. Therefore, the cumulative FOR (fuel-oil ratio) is proposed, and the optimal superheated degree, optimal injection strategy, and its relation with the recovery mechanisms are studied. The results indicate that using superheated steam at 80°C superheated degree during the steam chamber horizontal expansion stage can increase the recovery factor around 12% and also reduce the cumulative FOR around 5.3 compared to the conventional SAGD strategy.
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.identifier.citationKe Huang, Siyuan Huang, Qi Jiang, and Yang Liu, “Experimental and Mechanism Study of Superheated SAGD vs. Conventional SAGD Technique: A Cost-Effective Scheme for Superheated SAGD,” Geofluids, vol. 2022, Article ID 1966959, 21 pages, 2022. doi:10.1155/2022/1966959
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1966959
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/114586
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/39706
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2022 Ke Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.titleExperimental and Mechanism Study of Superheated SAGD vs. Conventional SAGD Technique: A Cost-Effective Scheme for Superheated SAGD
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GEOFLUIDS.2022.1966959.pdf
Size:
7.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications