Adaptive designs in clinical trials: a systematic review-part I

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBen-Eltriki, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorRafiq, Aisha
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Arun
dc.contributor.authorPrabhu, Devashree
dc.contributor.authorAfolabi, Michael O. S.
dc.contributor.authorBaslhaw, Robert
dc.contributor.authorNeilson, Christine J.
dc.contributor.authorDriedger, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorMahmud, Salaheddin M.
dc.contributor.authorLacaze-Masmonteil, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorMarlin, Susan
dc.contributor.authorOffringa, Martin
dc.contributor.authorButcher, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorHeath, Anna
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Lauren E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T00:04:15Z
dc.date.available2024-10-06T00:04:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-04
dc.date.updated2024-10-06T00:04:15Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Adaptive designs (ADs) are intended to make clinical trials more flexible, offering efficiency and potentially cost-saving benefits. Despite a large number of statistical methods in the literature on different adaptations to trials, the characteristics, advantages and limitations of such designs remain unfamiliar to large parts of the clinical and research community. This systematic review provides an overview of the use of ADs in published clinical trials (Part I). A follow-up (Part II) will compare the application of AD in trials in adult and pediatric studies, to provide real-world examples and recommendations for the child health community. Methods Published studies from 2010 to April 2020 were searched in the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Ovid). Clinical trial protocols, reports, and a secondary analyses using AD were included. We excluded trial registrations and interventions other than drugs or vaccines to align with regulatory guidance. Data from the published literature on study characteristics, types of adaptations, statistical analysis, stopping boundaries, logistical challenges, operational considerations and ethical considerations were extracted and summarized herein. Results Out of 23,886 retrieved studies, 317 publications of adaptive trials, 267 (84.2%) trial reports, and 50 (15.8%) study protocols), were included. The most frequent disease was oncology (168/317, 53%). Most trials included only adult participants (265, 83.9%),16 trials (5.4%) were limited to only children and 28 (8.9%) were for both children and adults, 8 trials did not report the ages of the included populations. Some studies reported using more than one adaptation (there were 390 reported adaptations in 317 clinical trial reports). Most trials were early in drug development (phase I, II (276/317, 87%). Dose-finding designs were used in the highest proportion of the included trials (121/317, 38.2 %). Adaptive randomization (53/317, 16.7%), with drop-the-losers (or pick-the-winner) designs specifically reported in 29 trials (9.1%) and seamless phase 2-3 design was reported in 27 trials (8.5%). Continual reassessment methods (60/317, 18.9%) and group sequential design (47/317, 14.8%) were also reported. Approximately two-thirds of trials used frequentist statistical methods (203/309, 64%), while Bayesian methods were reported in 24% (75/309) of included trials. Conclusion This review provides a comprehensive report of methodological features in adaptive clinical trials reported between 2010 and 2020. Adaptation details were not uniformly reported, creating limitations in interpretation and generalizability. Nevertheless, implementation of existing reporting guidelines on ADs and the development of novel educational strategies that address the scientific, operational challenges and ethical considerations can help in the clinical trial community to decide on when and how to implement ADs in clinical trials. Study protocol registration https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2934-7 .
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Research Methodology. 2024 Oct 04;24(1):229
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02272-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1880/119952
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleAdaptive designs in clinical trials: a systematic review-part I
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12874_2024_Article_2272.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications