Psychometric evaluation of a Canadian version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-CAN)

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLawal, Oluwaseyi A
dc.contributor.authorAwosoga, Oluwagbohunmi
dc.contributor.authorSantana, Maria J
dc.contributor.authorJames, Matthew T
dc.contributor.authorSouthern, Danielle A
dc.contributor.authorWilton, Stephen B
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Michelle M
dc.contributor.authorKnudtson, Merrill
dc.contributor.authorLu, Mingshan
dc.contributor.authorQuan, Hude
dc.contributor.authorGhali, William A
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Colleen M
dc.contributor.authorSajobi, Tolulope
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-06T01:06:26Z
dc.date.available2020-12-06T01:06:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-01
dc.date.updated2020-12-06T01:06:26Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a widely-used patient-reported outcomes measure in patients with heart disease. This study assesses the validity and reliability of the SAQ in a Canadian cohort of individuals with stable angina. Methods and results Data are from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry, a population-based registry of patients who received cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada. The cohort consists of 4052 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for stable angina and completed the SAQ within 2 weeks. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the factorial structure of the SAQ. Internal and test–retest reliabilities of a new measure (i.e., SAQ-CAN) was measured using Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. CFA model fit was assessed using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI). Construct validity of the SAQ-CAN was assessed in relation to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Euro Quality of life 5 dimension (EQ5D), and original SAQ. Of the 4052 patients included in this analysis, 3281 (80.97%) were younger than 75 years old, while 3239 (79.94%) were male. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factorial structure consisting of 16 items that provided a better fit to the data (RMSEA = 0.049 [90% CI = (0.047, 0.052)]; CFI = 0.975). The 16-item SAQ demonstrated good to excellent internal reliability (Cronbach’s α range from 0.77 to 0.90), moderate to strong correlation with the Original SAQ and EQ5D but negligible correlations with HADS. Conclusion The SAQ-CAN has acceptable psychometric properties that are comparable to the original SAQ. We recommend its use for assessing coronary health outcomes in Canadian patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
dc.identifier.citationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 01;18(1):377
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01627-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/112807
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/44795
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of a Canadian version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-CAN)
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12955_2020_Article_1627.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications