Use of medical face masks versus particulate respirators as a component of personal protective equipment for health care workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

dc.contributor.authorConly, John
dc.contributor.authorSeto, W. H
dc.contributor.authorPittet, Didier
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Alison
dc.contributor.authorChu, May
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Paul R
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-09T00:02:53Z
dc.date.available2020-08-09T00:02:53Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-06
dc.date.updated2020-08-09T00:02:52Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Currently available evidence supports that the predominant route of human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 is through respiratory droplets and/or contact routes. The report by the World Health Organization (WHO) Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China supports person-to-person droplet and fomite transmission during close unprotected contact with the vast majority of the investigated infection clusters occurring within families, with a household secondary attack rate varying between 3 and 10%, a finding that is not consistent with airborne transmission. The reproduction number (R0) for the SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to be between 2.2–2.7, compatible with other respiratory viruses associated with a droplet/contact mode of transmission and very different than an airborne virus like measles with a R0 widely cited to be between 12 and 18. Based on the scientific evidence accumulated to date, our view is that SARS-CoV-2 is not spread by the airborne route  to  any significant extent and the use of particulate respirators offers no advantage over medical masks as a component of personal protective equipment for the routine care of patients with COVID-19 in the health care setting. Moreover, prolonged use of particulate respirators may result in unintended harms. In conjunction with appropriate hand hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE) used by health care workers caring for patients with COVID-19 must be used with attention to detail and precision of execution to prevent lapses in adherence and active failures in the donning and doffing of the PPE.
dc.identifier.citationAntimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2020 Aug 06;9(1):126
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00779-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/112371
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleUse of medical face masks versus particulate respirators as a component of personal protective equipment for health care workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13756_2020_Article_779.pdf
Size:
538.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: