Reproducibility and repeatability of a semi-automated pipeline to quantify trapeziometacarpal joint angles using dynamic computed tomography
| dc.contributor.author | Kuczynski, Michael T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Kendra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tse, Justin J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bugajski, Tomasz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Manske, Sarah L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-13T01:02:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-13T01:02:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-11-08 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2022-11-13T01:02:16Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background The trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint is a mechanically complex joint and is commonly affected by musculoskeletal diseases such as osteoarthritis. Quantifying in vivo TMC joint biomechanics, such as joint angles, with traditional reflective marker-based methods can be difficult due to the joint’s location in the hand. Dynamic computed tomography (CT) can facilitate the quantification of TMC joint motion by continuously capturing three-dimensional volumes over time. However, post-processing of dynamic CT datasets can be time intensive and automated methods are needed to reduce processing times to allow for application to larger clinical studies. The purpose of this work is to introduce a fast, semi-automated pipeline to quantify joint angles from dynamic CT scans of the TMC joint and evaluate the associated error in joint angle and translation computation by means of a reproducibility and repeatability study. Methods Ten cadaveric hands were scanned with dynamic CT using a passive motion device to move thumbs in a radial abduction–adduction motion. Static CT scans and high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scans were also acquired to generate high-resolution bone meshes. Abduction–adduction, flexion–extension, and axial rotation angles were computed using a joint coordinate system. Reproducibility and repeatability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland–Altman analysis, and root mean square errors. Target registration errors were computed to evaluate errors associated with image registration. Results We found good repeatability for flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, and axial rotation angles. Reproducibility was moderate for all three angles. Joint translations exhibited greater repeatability than reproducibility. Specimens with greater joint degeneration had lower repeatability and reproducibility. We found that the difference in resulting joint angles and translations were likely due to differences in segment coordinate system definition between multiple raters, rather than due to registration errors. Conclusions The proposed semi-automatic processing pipeline was fast, repeatable, and moderately reproducible when quantifying TMC joint angles and translations. This work provides a range of errors for TMC joint angles from dynamic CT scans using manually selected anatomical landmarks. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Medical Imaging. 2022 Nov 08;22(1):192 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00922-2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/115433 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/44875 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
| dc.title | Reproducibility and repeatability of a semi-automated pipeline to quantify trapeziometacarpal joint angles using dynamic computed tomography | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |