Developing the intersectionality supplemented Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and tools for intersectionality considerations

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Isabel B.
dc.contributor.authorFahim, Christine
dc.contributor.authorGarad, Yasmin
dc.contributor.authorPresseau, Justin
dc.contributor.authorHoens, Alison M.
dc.contributor.authorBraimoh, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Diane
dc.contributor.authorBruyn-Martin, Lora
dc.contributor.authorStraus, Sharon E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-12T01:03:14Z
dc.date.available2023-11-12T01:03:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-09
dc.date.updated2023-11-12T01:03:13Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The concept of intersectionality proposes that demographic and social constructs intersect with larger social structures of oppression and privilege to shape experiences. While intersectionality is a widely accepted concept in feminist and gender studies, there has been little attempt to use this lens in implementation science. We aimed to supplement the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a commonly used framework in implementation science, to support the incorporation of intersectionality in implementation science projects by (1) integrating an intersectional lens to the CFIR; and (2) developing a tool for researchers to be used alongside the updated framework. Methods Using a nominal group technique, an interdisciplinary framework committee (nā€‰=ā€‰17) prioritized the CFIR as one of three implementation science models, theories, and frameworks to supplement with intersectionality considerations; the modification of the other two frameworks are described in other papers. The CFIR subgroup (nā€‰=ā€‰7) reviewed the five domains and 26 constructs in the CFIR and prioritized domains and constructs for supplementation with intersectional considerations. The subgroup then iteratively developed recommendations and prompts for incorporating an intersectional approach within the prioritized domains and constructs. We developed recommendations and prompts to help researchers consider how personal identities and power structures may affect the facilitators and inhibitors of behavior change and the implementation of subsequent interventions. Results We achieved consensus on how to apply an intersectional lens to CFIR after six rounds of meetings. The final intersectionality supplemented CFIR includes the five original domains, and 28 constructs; the outer systems and structures and the outer cultures constructs were added to the outer setting domain. Intersectionality prompts were added to 13 of the 28 constructs. Conclusion Through an expert-consensus approach, we modified the CFIR to include intersectionality considerations and developed a tool with prompts to help implementation users apply an intersectional lens using the updated framework.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Research Methodology. 2023 Nov 09;23(1):262
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02083-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1880/117559
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/42402
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleDeveloping the intersectionality supplemented Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and tools for intersectionality considerations
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12874_2023_Article_2083.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.25 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Publications