Role of preoperative intravenous iron therapy to correct anemia before major surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorElhenawy, Abdelsalam M
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Steven R
dc.contributor.authorBagshaw, Sean M
dc.contributor.authorMacArthur, Roderick G
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Linda J
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-24T01:05:45Z
dc.date.available2021-01-24T01:05:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-23
dc.date.updated2021-01-24T01:05:45Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Preoperative anemia is a common comorbidity that often necessitates allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). As there is a risk associated with blood transfusions, preoperative intravenous iron (IV) has been proposed to increase the hemoglobin to reduce perioperative transfusion; however, randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating this efficacy for IV iron are small, limited, and inconclusive. Consequently, a meta-analysis that pools these studies may provide new and clinically useful information. Methods/design Databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews; Cochrane-controlled trial registry; Scopus; registries of health technology assessment and clinical trials; Web of Science; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; Clinicaltrials.gov; and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) were searched. Also, we screened all the retrieved reference lists. Selection criteria Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance (i.e., relevant, irrelevant, or potentially relevant). Then, we screened full texts of those citations identified as potentially applicable. Results Our search found 3195 citations and ten RCTs (1039 participants) that met our inclusion criteria. Preoperative IV iron supplementation significantly decreases ABT by 16% (risk ratio (RR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71, 0.99, p = 0.04). In addition, preoperatively, hemoglobin levels increased after receiving IV iron (mean difference [MD] between the study groups: 7.15 g/L, 95% CI: 2.26, 12.04 g/L, p = 0.004) and at follow-up >  4 weeks postoperatively (MD: 6.46 g/L, 95% CI: 3.10, 9.81, p = 0.0002). Iron injection was not associated with increased incidence of non-serious or serious adverse effects across groups (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.65, p = 0.52) and (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.44, 2.10, p = 0.92) respectively. Conclusions With moderate certainty, due to the high risk of bias in some studies in one or two domains, we found intravenous iron supplementation is associated with a significant decrease in the blood transfusions rate, and modest hemoglobin concentrations rise when injected pre-surgery compared with placebo or oral iron supplementation. However, further full-scale randomized controlled trials with robust methodology are required. In particular, the safety, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of different intravenous iron preparations require further evaluation.
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews. 2021 Jan 23;10(1):36
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01579-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/112998
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/45163
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleRole of preoperative intravenous iron therapy to correct anemia before major surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13643_2021_Article_1579.pdf
Size:
2.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: