Three Essays in Industrial Organization and Energy Economics

atmire.migration.oldid3472
dc.contributor.advisorYuan, Lasheng
dc.contributor.authorLian, Zeng
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-26T14:40:27Z
dc.date.available2015-11-20T08:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-26
dc.date.submitted2015en
dc.description.abstractThe first chapter is about market efficiency. Broadly, the primary objective of antitrust policy is to promote efficiency. However, economists do not measure efficiency directly. Rather, they use a less precise concept, market power, because it is thought that market power is more easily measured and correlated with efficiency. The Herfindahl and Lerner indexes are standard measures of market power. This paper explores the circumstances in which these two indexes are and are not reliable indicators of efficiency. In most models, both indexes are often not good proxies of efficiency. In addition, I show how to compute efficiency directly by using firm level output and market price. I conclude that it is not easier to measure market power than efficiency. The second chapter focuses on the dynamic properties of an oligopolistic market structure with stochastic successful probability of creating or maintaining investments for a firm. In each period of a game, a representative firm decides whether to have positioning (creating or maintaining) investments. All established firms compete either in the Bertrand or Cournot framework. By adopting symmetric Market perfect Nash equilibrium, firms choose strategies to maximize the discounted present value of cash flow. We obtain the steady state of the system and the expected duration for each state of the system in different market competitions. We also discover the efficiency level is higher in the Cournot rather than the Bertrand competition with different numbers of active firms in the market. The third chapter develops a theoretical model for the electricity sector in the presence of imperfect competition in a Cournot framework. By allowing market size, industry concentration, and technology to differ, the model incorporates transmission costs and transmission capacity. We identify the condition under which trade benefits a single country or increases global welfare by changing these asymmetric factors for each country. We discover that the expansion of transmission capacity between two countries is not always beneficial for a single country or for global welfare.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLian, Z. (2015). Three Essays in Industrial Organization and Energy Economics (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/28439en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/28439
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11023/2408
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subject.classificationIndustrial Organizationen_US
dc.titleThree Essays in Industrial Organization and Energy Economics
dc.typedoctoral thesis
thesis.degree.disciplineEconomics
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ucalgary_2015_lian_zeng.pdf
Size:
5.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: