Comparison of risk adjustment methods in patients with liver disease using electronic medical record data
| dc.contributor.author | Xu, Yuan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Ning | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lu, Mingshan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dixon, Elijah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Myers, Robert P | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jolley, Rachel J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Quan, Hude | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-26T12:01:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-09-26T12:01:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-01-07 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-09-26T12:01:36Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Risk adjustment is essential for valid comparison of patients’ health outcomes or performances of health care providers. Several risk adjustment methods for liver diseases are commonly used but the optimal approach is unknown. This study aimed to compare the common risk adjustment methods for predicting in-hospital mortality in cirrhosis patients using electronic medical record (EMR) data. Methods The sample was derived from Beijing YouAn hospital between 2010 and 2014. Previously validated EMR extraction methods were applied to define liver disease conditions, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), MELD sodium (MELDNa), and five-variable MELD (5vMELD). The performance of the common risk adjustment models as well as models combining disease severity and comorbidity indexes for predicting in-hospital mortality was compared using c-statistic. Results Of 11,121 cirrhotic patients, 69.9% were males and 15.8% age 65 or older. The c-statistics across compared models ranged from 0.785 to 0.887. All models significantly outperformed the baseline model with age, sex, and admission status (c-statistic: 0.628). The c-statistics for the CCI, ECI, MELDNa, and CTP were 0.808, 0.825, 0.849, and 0.851, respectively. The c-statistic was 0.887 for combination of CTP and ECI, and 0.882 for combination of MELDNa score and ECI. Conclusions The liver disease severity indexes (i.e., CTP and MELDNa score) outperformed the CCI and ECI for predicting in-hospital mortality among cirrhosis patients using Chinese EMRs. Combining liver disease severity and comorbidities indexes could improve the discrimination power of predicting in-hospital mortality. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan 07;17(1):5 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0559-4 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1880/107889 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
| dc.title | Comparison of risk adjustment methods in patients with liver disease using electronic medical record data | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |